Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Sustained Interactions between T Cell Receptors and Antigens Promote the Differentiation of CD4+ Memory T Cells  Chulwoo Kim, Theodore Wilson, Kael F.
Identification of CD3+CD4−CD8− T Cells as Potential Regulatory Cells in an Experimental Murine Model of Graft-Versus-Host Skin Disease (GVHD)  Fumi Miyagawa,
Local Inflammatory Cues Regulate Differentiation and Persistence of CD8+ Tissue- Resident Memory T Cells  Tessa Bergsbaken, Michael J. Bevan, Pamela J.
Following the Development of a CD4 T Cell Response In Vivo
Feedback Regulation of Pathogen-Specific T Cell Priming
Initial T Cell Receptor Transgenic Cell Precursor Frequency Dictates Critical Aspects of the CD8+ T Cell Response to Infection  Vladimir P. Badovinac,
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
miR-150-Mediated Foxo1 Regulation Programs CD8+ T Cell Differentiation
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Viral Infection Results in Massive CD8+ T Cell Expansion and Mortality in Vaccinated Perforin-Deficient Mice  Vladimir P Badovinac, Sara E Hamilton, John.
Ananda W Goldrath, Michael J Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Yosuke Kamimura, Lewis L. Lanier  Cell Reports 
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (April 2018)
B-1a and B-1b Cells Exhibit Distinct Developmental Requirements and Have Unique Functional Roles in Innate and Adaptive Immunity to S. pneumoniae  Karen.
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Protective Capacity of Memory CD8+ T Cells Is Dictated by Antigen Exposure History and Nature of the Infection  Jeffrey C. Nolz, John T. Harty  Immunity 
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Saskia Hemmers, Alexander Y. Rudensky  Cell Reports 
Dynamics of Blood-Borne CD8 Memory T Cell Migration In Vivo
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
T Cell-Positive Selection Uses Self-Ligand Binding Strength to Optimize Repertoire Recognition of Foreign Antigens  Judith N. Mandl, João P. Monteiro,
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
An Interleukin-21- Interleukin-10-STAT3 Pathway Is Critical for Functional Maturation of Memory CD8+ T Cells  Weiguo Cui, Ying Liu, Jason S. Weinstein,
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
T Cells with Low Avidity for a Tissue-Restricted Antigen Routinely Evade Central and Peripheral Tolerance and Cause Autoimmunity  Dietmar Zehn, Michael.
Myung H. Kim, Elizabeth J. Taparowsky, Chang H. Kim  Immunity 
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e8 (April 2018)
Matthew A. Williams, Eugene V. Ravkov, Michael J. Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Susan M. Kaech, Scott Hemby, Ellen Kersh, Rafi Ahmed  Cell 
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Courtney R. Plumlee, Brian S. Sheridan, Basak B. Cicek, Leo Lefrançois 
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2018)
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
CD8 T cell memory alters the immune profile in enhanced HLH without altering viral load. CD8 T cell memory alters the immune profile in enhanced HLH without.
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
The effect of βAR signaling on the generation of a cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell response in vivo. The effect of βAR signaling on the generation of a cytotoxic.
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 627-635 (October 2016) A Minimum Epitope Overlap between Infections Strongly Narrows the Emerging T Cell Repertoire  Susanne G. Oberle, Layane Hanna-El-Daher, Vijaykumar Chennupati, Sarah Enouz, Stefanie Scherer, Martin Prlic, Dietmar Zehn  Cell Reports  Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 627-635 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.072 Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2016 17, 627-635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.072) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Only High-Affinity T Cells Expand in Listeria-Immune Mice (A) Schematic illustration of the Experimental Procedures. Naive controls and C57BL/6 mice infected with wild-type Listeria (Lm-WT) received 104 naive OT-1 4 weeks later and the indicated Listeria strains. (B) Frequency of OT-1 T cells among peripheral blood CD8+ T cells 6 days after infection. Numbers indicate the ratio of OT-1 T cells in naive and Lm-WT immune hosts. (C) Naive or Lm-WT immune mice grafted with 2.5 × 105 CFSE-labeled OT-1 cells and infected with Lm-N4 or Lm-T4. CFSE dilution among splenic OT-1 (filled histogram) was measured 78 hr later. Dashed lines are unlabeled host CD8+ T cells. Data are representative of three (B) or two (C) independent experiments with three to five mice per group. (D) Naive or Lm-WT infected Rip-mOva mice were 4 weeks later engrafted with low-affinity H-2Kb/Ova-specific OT-3 TCR transgenic T cells and then infected with Lm-N4. Blood glucose levels were determined 8 days later. Statistical analysis are unpaired Student’s t tests with ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Cell Reports 2016 17, 627-635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.072) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Even Extremely Low-Affinity Stimulation Induces Normal Activation and Memory Generation (A) Dose response curves graphing peptide concentration against the fraction of maximum numbers of IFNγ producing T cells were obtained by briefly stimulating an OT-1 T cell line in vitro with the indicated peptides. Note that only a fraction of the OT-1 T cells produced IFNγ after very low-affinity ligand stimulation. Data were therefore normalized to better compare the EC50. (B) C57BL/6 mice transferred with 2 × 105 CFSE-labeled OT-1 cells and infected the indicated Listeria strains were analyzed for splenic CFSE dilution at 76 hr post infection. (C and D) Naive mice received 105 OT-1 T cells and an Lm-D4 or Lm-N4 infection. Splenocytes were 4.5 days later and briefly re-stimulated with SIINFEKL peptide and stained intracellularly for IFNγ, TNF (C), and GrzB (D). (C) shows representative OT-1 and (D) CD8+ gated flow cytometry plots. (E) Naive mice received 2 × 104 OT-1 and the indicated Listeria strains and OT-1 frequency among peripheral blood CD8+ T cells was determined 28 days later. The mice were then infected with VSV-N4, and the OT-1 frequency was measured 4 days later in the blood. (F) CFSE+ OT-1-containing mice were infected with Lm-N4, Lm-Cpα1, Lm-βcat, or Lm-E1 and analyzed as described in (B). The data are representative for four (A) or three independent experiments with three to five mice per group (B, C, and D) or two experiments with two to five mice per group (E and F). Statistical analysis are unpaired Student’s t tests, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Cell Reports 2016 17, 627-635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.072) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Memory CD8+ T Cells Raise the Activation Threshold in Secondary Infections Independently of the Inflammatory Milieu (A and B) Control (–) or LCMV-immune mice received 4 weeks after the infection 104 OT-1 and Listeria co-expressing the LCMV gp33 peptide and N4 Ova (Lm-gp33-N4) or gp33 and T4 Ova (Lm-gp33-T4). Note that only the gp33 and gp34 epitopes are shared between the consecutive infections. Frequency of blood OT-1 T cells among total CD8+ T cells was measured 6 days later. Numbers indicate the OT-1 frequency fold change between naive and immune hosts. (C and D) 3 × 105 naive CFSE-labeled OT-1 cells were transferred at different time points into ongoing primary Lm-N4 or secondary Lm-WT and Lm-N4 infections in order to assess antigen presentation kinetics. CFSE dilution was measured 80 hr after the transfer. (E and F) Naive and LCMV-immune mice were infected with 2,000 or 2 × 105 CFU Lm-gp33-T4. Another LCMV-immune group was co-infected with 2 × 105 CFU Lm-gp33-T4 plus 2,000 CFU Lm-WT. Splenic Listeria load was determined 4 days later (E), and the OT-1 frequency among total blood CD8+ T cells was determined 6 days later (F). (G) Naive (–) or LCMV-immune (LCMV) mice received 104 OT-1 and 106 CFU ActA-deficient Listeria (ActA−gp33-N4 or ActA−gp33-T4). The OT-1 frequency among total blood CD8+ T cells was determined 6 days later. Numbers indicate the OT-1 ratio in naive and immune hosts. The data are representative for two (A–F) or one (G) independent experiments with n = 3–5 per group. Statistical analysis are unpaired Student’s t tests with ∗p < 0.1, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Cell Reports 2016 17, 627-635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.072) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Endogenous Memory CD8+ T Cells Effectively Raise the Activation Threshold (A and B) All mice received 104 OT-1 T cells and some 3 × 105 (A) or 106 (B) memory P14 T cells. The OT-1 frequency among total CD8+ T cells was determined 7 days after infecting the mice with Lm-gp33-N4 or Lm-gp33-T4. Data are representative for two independent experiments with n = 5 mice per group. (C–E) CD45.1 P14 memory T cells were obtained from mice infected 30–90 days earlier with LCMV and transferred into naive mice. Shown are memory P14 T cell populations before and after the transfer. Bars represent individual mice, and the relative distribution of the indicated P14 subsets. The plots on the right show the frequency of KLRG1+ (C) and CD27+CD43+ subpopulations (D). Dots represent individual mice. (E) Mice with endogenous memory cells were i.v. injected with fluorescently labeled anti-CD8 antibody and sacrificed 3 min. later. CD127/KLRG1 and CD27/CD43 expression status on antibody-positive and -negative cells are shown as indicated in (D). Data are representative for two to four independent experiments with n = 3–5 mice per group. Statistical analyses are unpaired Student’s t tests with ∗p < 0.1, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Cell Reports 2016 17, 627-635DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.072) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions