BACK TO: Voting Rights Act Adjustments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission The Redistricting Process.
Advertisements

Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Analysis of Public Hearings Round One.
CVRA Analysis Redistricting, 2013 San Bernardino CCD.
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Compactness Measures.
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Round II Hearings.
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Competitiveness.
Lassen County 2011 Supervisorial Reapportionment Public Hearing Lassen County Courthouse – Photo courtesy of Couso Technology & Design.
Redistricting, 2011 League of California Cities. What is Redistricting definition Redistricting is the process of drawing district lines. It is done every.
Name- Representing Paid for by Support Independent Maps. A copy of our report filed with the State Board of Elections is (or will be) available on the.
Electricity Industry Deregulation in Taiwan I. Summary of the Framework of Electricity Industry Liberalization in Taiwan.
MTH 065 Elementary Algebra II Chapter 5 – Polynomials Section 5.6 – Special Products Copyright © 2008 by Ron Wallace, all rights reserved.
* Where on the periodic table are they? * What are their similar characteristics? * Which atoms are members of this group? * What does society use them.
FARMINGTON MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Education Redistricting Proposal 2002.
Area of Rectangles & Squares Geometry Mr. Bower BowerPower.net.
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 In-house QC Semi-Automated Duplicate Checking, Large Fire Refinement Complex Fire Identification Phase 2 Fire.
Segmentation, Targeting, and Positioning. Segmenting, Targeting, and Positioning What do these words mean? My opinion is that the none of these three.
TAP - Trends Analysis and Projections HAV Meeting May 2013.
Prepared by: Lake Research Partners 1000 BROADWAY SUITE 294 OAKLAND, CA PHONE: FAX: M St., NW.
LEE COUNTY NAACP REDISTRICTING PLAN Opportunities for improving representation of students and parents on the expanded Lee County School Board A presentation.
TODAY IN GEOMETRY… Review: Arc Length
Issues in Redistricting Reform. Prop. 11 and Minority Communities Watts was split by incumbents into 3 districts at the Senate and Congressional levels.
Redistricting: Rebuilding the Foundation of Illinois Democracy David Hiller, McCormick Foundation CHANGE IL! Member Forum and Celebration March 16, 2010.
Asian Pacific American Legal Center Presentation to California’s Citizens Redistricting Commission February 26, 2011 PRESENTED BY: EUGENE LEE Voting Rights.
US 2 Mr. Perry.  Former Pres of Princeton Univ  Former Gov of NJ  Wilson wins the Election of 1912 thanks to the split in the Republican Party between.
Build each figure then sketch it in your comp book. Write the AREA for each A = _________________ x² + 2x + 2 2x + 3 x² + 2x + 2.
Community-based Adaptation Project Inception Workshop CBA Database Additions © 2007 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Proprietary and Confidential.
1 Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Racially Polarized Voting Analysis 11/29/2011.
Area of Rectangles & Squares Geometry Mr. Bower BowerPower.net.
CS 221 – May 24 What is it good for? – Many trials or iterations needed for maximum precision – Large input – Intractable problems Please note: – H2 due.
Orange County Redistricting. 22 Legal Factors Equal Population Equal Population Compactness Compactness Contiguity Contiguity Preservation of Political.
Date: 5/19/15 Aim: How do we analyze evidence? 1)Warm Up : Read the exemplar Introduction and label the following parts.  Hook  Background Information.
WHAT IS REDISTRICTING? It’s the process of drawing electoral district lines. For congressional, state assembly, state senate or city council districts.
基 督 再 來 (一). 經文: 1 你們心裡不要憂愁;你們信神,也當信我。 2 在我父的家裡有許多住處;若是沒有,我就早 已告訴你們了。我去原是為你們預備地去 。 3 我 若去為你們預備了地方,就必再來接你們到我那 裡去,我在 那裡,叫你們也在那裡, ] ( 約 14 : 1-3)
More ideas. Better solutions. Waste Generation Pounds of Residential Solid Waste Collected per capita.
1 County of Napa Proposed Supervisor Districts Redistricting Overview of Redistricting Guiding principle is one person one vote 2010 Census numbers.
Teacher's Notes Topic: Pythagoras Perimeters
New York State Government
Budget Process and Timeline
BACK TO: COMPETITIVE PLANS
Support Redistricting Reform in Pennsylvania
A Typical Synovial Joint
February 12 – 19, 2018.
COMMUNICATION.
Population pyramids Age - Sex Graphs.
7 Market Research Section 7.1 What Is Market Research?
Polygons and Perimeter
فرایند تسهیلگری در مددکاری جامعه ای
Marketing Environment
Pricing Methods Cost-based pricing
Terry Eagan – Project Manager
Слайд-дәріс Қарағанды мемлекеттік техникалық университеті
.. -"""--..J '. / /I/I =---=-- -, _ --, _ = :;:.
The Role of the Legislature in Redistricting and Ways Local Officials
Contact Point for Romania in DG Competition
II //II // \ Others Q.
I1I1 a 1·1,.,.,,I.,,I · I 1··n I J,-·
Best IUD Specialist in Mesa, Arizona Area
ECONOMICS: February 27 Warm-up What are the differences between the monopoly and the monopolistic competition market structure? Economics Learning Target.
7 Market Research Section 7.1 What Is Market Research?
Weighted Voting.
ECONOMICS: February 26 Warm-up How do the number of producers in a market structure help us determine ease of entry into the market? Why do businesses.
The Economic Contribution of Hospitals
The FRAME Routine Essential details
Study Identification and Selection Process
Similarities Differences
JUDGING COMPETITIVE POSITION
. '. '. I;.,, - - "!' - -·-·,Ii '.....,,......, -,
Find the Perimeter.
California’s Independent Redistricting Movement
Lessons from the First Citizens Redistricting Commission
Presentation transcript:

BACK TO: Voting Rights Act Adjustments A Presentation to the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission February 9, 2004

Summary of Test (s) GOAL: Adjust competitive plans for compliance with Judge’s order and findings on Voting Rights Process: Unite each reservation and meet Coalition II plan Hispanic community targets

Plan to present A1 VRA 2 Adjustments to Competitive Test Plan A1 Similar work underway on B1, A2 and B2 Overall impact on competitiveness and other characteristics of those plans is expected to be similar

Competitiveness 5 4 3 7 23 14 22 16 10 6 21 AQD < 7% 1990s Plan Grid 2001 Plan 2002 Plan 2004 Plan Hall-Minkoff Test Comp A1 Comp B1 Comp A2 Comp B2 A1 VRA 2 AQD < 7% 5 4 3 7 23 14 22 16 10 JudgeIt < 7% 6 21

City Splits 1990s Plan Grid 2001 Plan 2002 Plan 2004 Plan Hall-Minkoff Test Comp A1 Comp B1 Comp A2 Comp B2 A1 VRA 2 Split Cities 17 22 16 15 31 41 30 42 33 # of Splits 54 61 57 112 130 114 137 115

Compactness 10 8 16 3 P-P <0.17 Perimeter Sum 1990s Plan Grid Hall-Minkoff Test Comp A1 Comp B1 Comp A2 Comp B2 A1 VRA 2 P-P <0.17 10 8 16 3 Perimeter Sum 10,448 6,717 8,687 8,735 8,814 8,795 11,219 10,067 12,033 10,841 8,760

BACK TO: Voting Rights Act Adjustments A Presentation to the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission February 9, 2004