INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Building a research ethos Barbara Edwards 11 June 2010.
Advertisements

EU – ACP PROGRAMME FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS AND CAPACITY BUILDING (PSTICB) 9 ACP RPR 61.
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
Council of Europe seminar Odessa November 2010 Per Nyborg How can academic staff contribute to internal quality development?
Embedding Public Engagement Sophie Duncan and Paul Manners National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Evaluation and Rating Natural Scientists and Engineers.
Prof. Robert Morrell, UCT Research Office Presentation to North West University 28 February 2014.
Guidelines for completing a proposal Leaders Opportunity Fund.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
BC Nursing Research Initiative New Funding Proposals – Feb.2010 Bubli Chakraborty, MES,RN Nursing Research Facilitator/Leader
The quality assurance system in Sweden Håkan Hult Linköping University Gdansk March 13, 2009.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
What do reviewers look for in a research proposal? Research Councils’ review criteria Dimitra Koutsantoni Research & Knowledge Transfer Manager.
The Life Cycle of an NIH Grant Application Alicia Dombroski, Ph.D. Deputy Director Division of Extramural Activities NIDCR.
NSERC has an overview of the discovery grant program on their website:
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
Wellcome Trust - Funding the best science
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
2015 Commendations and Citations Information Session.
Acumanage Draft presentation Effective Leadership & Project Management Courses 1 L. Zegers – Training courses (in English, French or Spanish) Course 1:
A STRATEGIC INNOVATION FUND PROJECT LED BY: February 2010I.Sheridan CIT 1 Recognition of Prior Learning Education in Employment Strategic Innovation Fund.
Approaches to quality assurance TIPA’s perspectives Fatmir Demneri.
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
Closing date 28 February  Assessment of your recent research track record  International peer review  Based on the quality of research outputs.
Rejoinders for ARC DP Assessment Reports: Your last chance for influencing the CoE members Zhihong Xu Griffith University.
Work of the National Research Foundation (NRF) Relating to Arts & Culture Prepared for: The Portfolio Committee on Arts and Culture Dr Rocky Skeef Tuesday.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
NHMRC Development Grants Overall Objectives The aim of a Development Grant is to progress research to a stage where it can attract investment from.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Business Plan and Budget for the Council on Higher Education (CHE) 2009/10 Presentation to a Joint Meeting of the Portfolio Committees on Basic Education.
The Role of a Program Director NCI Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop October 18-19, 2010 Jerry Li, MD, PhD Division of Cancer Biology NCI/NIH.
Funding Opportunities for Investigator-initiated Grants with Foreign Components at the NIH Somdat Mahabir, PhD, MPH Program Director Epidemiology and Genetics.
Teacher Advisory & Assessment Scheme. Ambition in Action Gerard Kell Learning and Innovation Annette Leverett Learning and Innovation.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Inyathelo The South African Institute for Advancement.
Building Better Opportunities March 2016 Ramona Herdman and Russell Darbon.
Introducing Victorian Curriculum - Towards Foundation Levels A to D.
KTP Assessment Criteria May Assessment system changes New system in place for May 2016 KTP close Aligns with other Innovate UK assessment systems.
NRF Evaluation & Rating
Pre-application advice
Australian Council for Educational Research in the International Context Marion Meiers.
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Structural Funds - Project Appraisal and Selection
Launch of the Urban Pathways project
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Identifying Programs and Contacting Program Directors
Future Fellowships: perspective from a SAC member
Grant Writing Information Session
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
NRF Funding Opportunities
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Doctoral training partnerships
Introducing Victorian Curriculum - Towards Foundation Levels A to D
External Peer Reviewer Orientation
Information for Parents
Dr. Franceso Leri, Department of Psychology
School of Dentistry Education Research Fund (SDERF)
NRF Evaluation & Rating
Information for Parents
Unlocking the Future & Distinct SA Research Opportunities
Rating in 2002 for funding from 2003
Research Support & Quality Assessment
National Research Foundation
Information for Parents
Research Information & Knowledge Management (RI & KM)
RESEARCH FUNDING Organisational communication Science Communication
Module 9 Staff Training and Capacity Development
History of the Pacific Islands Oceanic Fisheries Management Project
Presentation transcript:

INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANTS FOCUS AREA PROGRAMMES The purpose of the nine focus area programmes is to build the knowledge base by directing research into areas of strategic importance to South Africa

Access: Focus Area Programmes Who may apply for funding ? Same as before but emphasis on research training component in definition of research organisation was scaled down Funding cycles: All researchers: Two years times three and then to obtain a rating if not rated NRF rated researchers: Up to 5 years, but synchronised with rating cycle

How to Select an Appropriate Focus Area Programme Applicants should first consider applying to the other programmes before choosing: Distinct South African Research Opportunities Unlocking the Future Special conditions for: Indigenous Knowledge Systems Sea and the Coast Programme II

Process Forms: http://submissions.nrf.ac.za/ Validation by institution NRF screening Postal peer review Panel assessment Awards Feedback (on request) Appeals (unlikely to be considered due to thorough process)

Postal Peer Review 4 - 6 reviewers (specialists) of scientific merit Applicant may nominate or veto Significance (originality / innovation / importance / viability in terms of contribution to disciplines) Approach (Justification / methods / design / newness) Feasibility (expertise, progress, preliminary data)

Panel Review Scientific merit informed by the peer reviewer reports Relevance to Focus Area Human Resource Capacity Development Strategic importance of outcomes Appropriateness of resources Advice on fundability and level of funding Student support Operating costs Staff development grants