Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (August 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 92, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Advertisements

Fabio Trovato, Edward P. O’Brien  Biophysical Journal 
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Maryam Sayadi, Seiichiro Tanizaki, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
(Un)Folding Mechanisms of the FBP28 WW Domain in Explicit Solvent Revealed by Multiple Rare Event Simulation Methods  Jarek Juraszek, Peter G. Bolhuis 
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Yufeng Liu, Meng Ke, Haipeng Gong  Biophysical Journal 
Dejun Lin, Alan Grossfield  Biophysical Journal 
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 107, Issue 10, Pages (November 2014)
SAXS versus FRET: A Matter of Heterogeneity?
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Investigating How Peptide Length and a Pathogenic Mutation Modify the Structural Ensemble of Amyloid Beta Monomer  Yu-Shan Lin, Gregory R. Bowman, Kyle A.
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
MSMBuilder: Statistical Models for Biomolecular Dynamics
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Supriyo Bhattacharya, Nagarajan Vaidehi  Biophysical Journal 
Robert M. Elder, Arthi Jayaraman  Biophysical Journal 
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Qiaochu Li, Stephen J. King, Ajay Gopinathan, Jing Xu 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of the ATP/apo State of a Multidrug ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Provide a Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the.
J.L. Robertson, L.G. Palmer, B. Roux  Biophysical Journal 
Yuno Lee, Philip A. Pincus, Changbong Hyeon  Biophysical Journal 
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Li Sun, Jeffrey K. Noel, Herbert Levine, José N. Onuchic 
Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Protegrin-1 Monomer and Dimer in Two Different Lipid Bilayers  Huan Rui, Jinhyuk Lee, Wonpil Im 
Hisashi Ishida, Hidetoshi Kono  Biophysical Journal 
Murat Çetinbaş, Eugene I. Shakhnovich  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Molecular Interactions of Alzheimer's Biomarker FDDNP with Aβ Peptide
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Yuguang Mu, Lars Nordenskiöld, James P. Tam  Biophysical Journal 
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Chetan Poojari, Dequan Xiao, Victor S. Batista, Birgit Strodel 
Protein Grabs a Ligand by Extending Anchor Residues: Molecular Simulation for Ca2+ Binding to Calmodulin Loop  Chigusa Kobayashi, Shoji Takada  Biophysical.
Untangling the Influence of a Protein Knot on Folding
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Insight into Early-Stage Unfolding of GPI-Anchored Human Prion Protein
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Logan S. Ahlstrom, Osamu Miyashita  Biophysical Journal 
Hierarchical Cascades of Instability Govern the Mechanics of Coiled Coils: Helix Unfolding Precedes Coil Unzipping  Elham Hamed, Sinan Keten  Biophysical.
Steven M. Kreuzer, Ron Elber  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Phosphatase Specificity and Pathway Insulation in Signaling Networks
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Chris Neale, Henry D. Herce, Régis Pomès, Angel E. García 
Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Agnes Noy, Anthony Maxwell, Sarah A. Harris  Biophysical Journal 
Steady-State Differential Dose Response in Biological Systems
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Martini Coarse-Grained Force Field: Extension to RNA
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Cotranslational Folding Increases GFP Folding Yield
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages L7-L9 (January 2009)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 785-793 (August 2017) Bridging Microscopic and Macroscopic Mechanisms of p53-MDM2 Binding with Kinetic Network Models  Guangfeng Zhou, George A. Pantelopulos, Sudipto Mukherjee, Vincent A. Voelz  Biophysical Journal  Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 785-793 (August 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.009 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Simulation trajectory data projected to p53-MDM2 distance and the p53 RMSD-to-native show a preference for binding before folding. Colored boxes highlight the partitioning into four states based on these reaction coordinates: folded-bound (blue), unfolded-bound (green), folded-unbound (red), and unfolded-unbound (cyan). Black circles show the locations of cluster centers of the 600 MSM microstates. The heat map density and color bar show the distribution sampled by the raw trajectory data. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 785-793DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.009) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Trajectory data projected to the 2D tICA landscape, with MSM microstates color-coded and overlaid with color-shaded cartoons to highlight the locations of the four states described in Fig. 1. The 100 highest-flux binding pathways calculated from TPT (black lines) fall into two groups, each dominated by a different unfolded-bound basin with W23 misregistered outside of the binding cleft. Representative structures for these two basins, the folded-bound native state, and the unfolded-unbound state are shown in circles. The heat map density and color bar show the distribution sampled by the raw trajectory data. The equilibrium state probabilities from the MSM are shown in Fig. S13. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 785-793DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.009) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A four-state kinetic model of possible p53-MDM2 binding mechanisms includes both IF and CS pathways. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 785-793DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.009) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Predicted fraction of binding flux going through IF pathways from the four-state kinetic model. Shown is the fractional flux versus total MDM2 concentration, given for various p53 concentrations and residual helicities. The dashed line denotes the concentrations of MDM2 and p53 (7.1 mM) used in the molecular simulations. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 785-793DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.009) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Predicted p53-MDM2 binding affinities versus MDM2 concentration from the four-state kinetic model. Increasing the residual helicity of p53 TAD from 28 to 64% increases affinity by ΔΔG = −1.5 kcal/mol, in good agreement with experiment (−1.3 ± 0.3 kcal/mol). The dashed line denotes the concentrations of MDM2 and p53 (7.1 mM) used in the molecular simulations. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 785-793DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.009) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions