Ptbp2 Controls an Alternative Splicing Network Required for Cell Communication during Spermatogenesis  Molly M. Hannigan, Leah L. Zagore, Donny D. Licatalosi 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1. Gene expression analysis
Advertisements

Pol II Docking and Pausing at Growth and Stress Genes in C. elegans
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Global Mapping of Human RNA-RNA Interactions
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Discovery and Characterization of piRNAs in the Human Fetal Ovary
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Zhifei Luo, Suhn Kyong Rhie, Fides D. Lay, Peggy J. Farnham 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Shinsuke Ohba, Xinjun He, Hironori Hojo, Andrew P. McMahon 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Mapping Whole-Transcriptome Splicing in Mouse Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Widespread Inhibition of Posttranscriptional Splicing Shapes the Cellular Transcriptome following Heat Shock  Reut Shalgi, Jessica A. Hurt, Susan Lindquist,
TED-Seq Identifies the Dynamics of Poly(A) Length during ER Stress
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Differential DNA Methylation Analysis without a Reference Genome
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages e4 (October 2018)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (August 2017)
Pol II Docking and Pausing at Growth and Stress Genes in C. elegans
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Shiran Bar, Maya Schachter, Talia Eldar-Geva, Nissim Benvenisty 
Evolution of Alu Elements toward Enhancers
Baekgyu Kim, Kyowon Jeong, V. Narry Kim  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Alterations in mRNA 3′ UTR Isoform Abundance Accompany Gene Expression Changes in Human Huntington’s Disease Brains  Lindsay Romo, Ami Ashar-Patel, Edith.
Impact of Alternative Splicing on the Human Proteome
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Universal Alternative Splicing of Noncoding Exons
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Maria S. Robles, Sean J. Humphrey, Matthias Mann  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e5 (March 2019)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (October 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages e7 (October 2018)
Nucleoporin Nup98 Associates with Trx/MLL and NSL Histone-Modifying Complexes and Regulates Hox Gene Expression  Pau Pascual-Garcia, Jieun Jeong, Maya.
Manfred Schmid, Agnieszka Tudek, Torben Heick Jensen  Cell Reports 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (May 2015)
Origins and Impacts of New Mammalian Exons
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e3 (March 2019)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e4 (May 2019)
Presentation transcript:

Ptbp2 Controls an Alternative Splicing Network Required for Cell Communication during Spermatogenesis  Molly M. Hannigan, Leah L. Zagore, Donny D. Licatalosi  Cell Reports  Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 2598-2612 (June 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 19, 2598-2612DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Identification of Stage-Specific AS Changes in Spermatogenesis (A) Top: schematic of the three pairwise comparisons of cell types (transitions) examined. Bottom: violin plots show the distribution of ΔPSI values (FDR < 0.05 and p < 0.05) for each AS category in transitions 1–3 (left, center, and right, respectively). Dashed lines are positioned at ΔPSI = ±20%. AS type is indicated at the bottom. (B) Pie chart showing the distribution of AS changes detected in each transition. (C) Number and overlap in genes with AS changes in one or more transitions. (D) Number and overlap in individual AS exons with changes in one or more transitions. (E) Clustered heatmaps showing PSI values of AS exons regulated in more than one transition (overlapping events from D), indicated by the blue/red color scale. Each column represents a single cell type in the transitions that are being compared, whereas each row represents an overlapping AS exon. Black dots represent an AS exon that undergoes a unidirectional, continuous splicing change. (F) Representative examples of RT-PCR validation of splicing changes measured in triplicate in P6 and P19 testes. (G) Bar chart showing the number of AS changes (ΔPSI = ±20%) for each AS category in each transition. Color code for each AS type is indicated in (A). (H) Distribution of absolute ΔPSI values in T1–T3. Dashed line represents ΔPSI > ±20%. See also Figures S1 and S2, Tables S1 and S3, and Data S1 and S4. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2598-2612DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Identification of AS Differences between WT and cKO Testes (A) Violin plots showing the distribution of ΔPSI values for each splicing category. (B) Two hundred fifty-seven AS changes with ΔPSI ≥ 20 in 217 genes, binned according to the splicing categories indicated at left. Color-coding reflects ΔPSI value, according to the gradient shown in (A). Pearson correlation coefficients (R) are shown at right for RPKM comparisons in WT and cKO for genes with AS changes in each category. (C) Representative examples of RT-PCR analysis of AS isoforms measured in replicate WT and cKO testes at P25. (D) Comparison of RPKM values for the 217 genes with ΔPSI = ±20% AS changes in WT and cKO testes. (E) Distribution of absolute fold change values for genes with RNA increases or decreases in cKO testes (black and red lines, respectively). Dashed line is positioned at absolute fold change of 2. Inset shows relative number of genes with RNA increases (gray) or decreases (red). (F) Comparison of fold change values for the 792 RNAs that shared 2-fold or greater differences (p < 0.01) in analysis of both WT versus cKO (x axis) and meiotic versus post-meiotic cells (y axis). Values in each corner correspond to the percentage of data points in each quadrant. (G) Representative example of RT-PCR validation of an AS event that is stage specific and Ptbp2 dependent, with postnatal age of tissue indicated at top. See also Figure S3, Tables S2 and S3, and Data S1 and S2. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2598-2612DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Ptbp2 Regulates AS Temporally (A) Intersection of AS cassette exons identified in T1 and in WT versus cKO datasets. (B) Distribution of ΔPSI values for 250 co-regulated cassette exons indicated in (A). (C) Intersection of AS cassette exons identified in T3 and in WT versus cKO datasets. (D) Distribution of ΔPSI values for 51 co-regulated cassette exons indicated in (C). Cell Reports 2017 19, 2598-2612DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Identification of Ptbp2 Binding Sites in the Germ Cell Transcriptome (A) Autorad of nitrocellulose membrane containing cross-linked and radiolabeled Ptbp2-RNA complexes immunopurified from lysates treated with either a high (1:1,000) or low (1:20,000) concentration of RNase. Assays were performed in parallel using UV-irradiated and non-irradiated testes (UV+ and UV−, respectively). Arrow denotes position of Ptbp2. Open bracket indicates region of membrane excised for library preparation. (B) Distribution of BR3 clusters in intergenic and genic regions. CDS corresponds to exonic coding sequences, whereas ambiguous BR3 clusters are those that map to sequences with more than one annotation. (C) Distribution of Z scores following tetramer-enrichment analysis for BR3 clusters. (D) Motifs with the top five Z scores are shown at left with the percentage of BR3 clusters containing each motif indicated. Pie chart indicates the percentage of clusters that contain one or more of the top five motifs. See also Figure S6 and Data S3. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2598-2612DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Analysis of Ptbp2-RNA Interactions Near Cassette Exons (A and D) Distribution of binding sites in 20-nt windows relative to the splice sites of the Ptbp2-enhanced (A, red boxes) and Ptbp2-repressed (D, blue boxes) cassette exons and the 5′ and 3′ splice sites of the upstream and downstream constitutively spliced exons, respectively. Each row in (A) and (D) represents a cassette exon region, with some rows empty due to the absence of a Ptbp2-RNA interaction within the intervals included in the figure. (B and E) Metagene summaries of the data in (A) and (D) are shown in (B) and (E), wherein thick dots indicate number of binding events relative to the indicated splice sites and the dotted lines represent the number of regions that have exons or introns of the indicated size. (C) Distribution of PhastCons scores for Ptbp2-RNA interactions in regions associated with Ptbp2-enhanced (red) and Ptbp2-repressed cassette exons. (F) Metagene analysis of Ptbp2 binding events in a control set of 100 randomly selected internal coding exons, with 35 containing BR2 or BR3 sites. Black line represents the number of Ptbp2 binding events relative to the indicated splice sites, whereas gray lines represent the number of regions that have exons or introns of the indicated size. See also Data S3. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2598-2612DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Enriched Gene Ontology Terms Associated with RNAs that Are Mis-spliced in Ptbp2-Deficient Testes (A) Hierarchical view of parent-child relationships for the enriched GO terms associated with genes with altered AS in cKO testis. Seven different groups were identified and outlined to match colors assigned to each group indicated at bottom. Circle sizes reflect the number of genes in each enriched term, whereas circle color reflects enrichment p value. (B) Clustering of genes based on co-occurrence in the enriched GO terms, with color-coded GO terms indicated at the top. (C) Higher magnification view of two boxed regions (dotted lines) from (B). See also Figure S4 and Data S4. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2598-2612DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Ptbp2 Loss in Germ Cells Results in Disorganization of the Sertoli Cell Actin Cytoskeleton Fluorescence microscopy to detect F-actin (phalloidin, green), acrosome (PNA, red), and DNA (DAPI, blue). (A–D) Representative seminiferous tubule from a P36 WT mouse, with (C) and (D) showing high-magnification views of the dotted box in (A) and (B), which contains elongated spermatids. (E–G) Representative example from a P36 cKO seminiferous tubule. (H–M) (H)–(J) and (K)–(M) show representative examples of seminiferous tubules from P24 WT and cKO mice, respectively. Open arrows indicate elongated spermatids, closed arrows indicate early round spermatids, and arrowheads indicate polarized F-actin filaments. The scale bar represents 25 μM. See also Figure S5. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2598-2612DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.089) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions