Who is BART in Idaho and how do we know?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Committee on Trade Facilitation. Origin of the proposal National Group that follows up on the WTO negotiation WTO Committee (W/157) Report of.
Advertisements

RH Requirement for BART  §308 (e) contains BART requirements for regional haze visibility impairment…. The State must submit an implementation plan containing.
Regional Haze Update & Current Results Michele Notarianni Brenda Johnson EPA Region 4.
Update on Regional Haze November 15, 2012 Michele Notarianni EPA Region 4 1.
Identification of BART-Eligible Sources in the WRAP Region A Summary of the April 4, 2005 Draft Report.
Region 9 Tribal Air Quality Conference Regional Haze Rulemakings: Western Regional Air Partnership Annex July 25, 2002.
BART-Eligible Sources in the WRAP Region Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting November 14-15, 2006 Tempe, AZ.
Ozone, PM2.5 and Regional Haze Timeline Dan Johnson Western States Air Resources Council.
1 Year in Review: Clean Air Act Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 Things Are Getting Really Complicated.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
1 WRAP Policy Fire Tracking Systems Draft December 9, 2002 FEJF Meeting December 10-11, 2002 Jackson, WY.
Final Amendments to the Regional Haze Rule: BART Rule Making June 16, 2005.
Air Quality Benefits from Energy Conservation Measures Anna Garcia April 2004.
An Update on the Colorado Regional Haze SIP Process and Outcomes Presented at: WRAP – Implementation Work Group San Francisco, CA March 2005.
ALTERNATIVES TO BART -TRADING- Lily Wong USEPA – Region 9 September 1, 2005.
Stationary Sources Joint Forum Update Eric Massey Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Lee Alter and Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association.
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
Ozone and NOx in the West WRAP November 11, 2009 Santa Fe, New Mexico Don Arkell Regional Haze Implementation.
BART Guideline Overview WESTAR August 31, 2005 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Todd Hawes
REGIONAL HAZE BART – Key Issues For Consideration Eric Massey, Arizona DEQ Lee Alter, WGA SSJF Meeting June 3, 2004 Denver, Colorado.
1 Colorado BART APCD. 2 Class 1 Areas National Parks and Wilderness Areas 12 in Colorado 4 National Parks 8 Wilderness Areas.
Best Available Retrofit Technology Rule - Colorado David R. Ouimette Colorado Air Pollution Control Division.
SSJF/EF/TDDWG Point and Area EI Project: Review of 2018 Base Case Emissions Projections Emissions Forum Meeting February 7, 2006.
Market Trading Forum Update Ira Domsky and Colleen Delaney, Co-chairs.
BART SIP Development: Example from Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park WRAP IWG Meeting, Denver, CO August 29, 2007 Presented by: Ray Mohr and Curt Taipale.
Air Quality Policy Division D P A Q 1 Regional Haze Update WESTAR September 17-19, 2007 EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards.
EPA – Regional Haze Issues IWG Meeting April 17 th Keith Rose and Laurel Dygowski.
BART Identification Project Update Lee Alter, WGA Stephanie Finn, ERG SSJF Meeting June 2-3, 2004 Denver, CO.
Reproposal of the Regional Haze Rule and BART Guidelines.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Alternatives to BART Rule Discussion with WRAP Nov , 2006.
Summary of June 15, 2005 Revisions to RH BART and BART Guidelines.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
OAQPS Update WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008.
BART Status of Other States AK, Bernalillo County, HI ND, SD, OR, WA.
2005 Progress on Emissions Inventories Attribution of Haze Workgroup Meeting January 24, 2006.
Fine Particles in the Air: Taking Action, Improving Health Presentation at STAPPA/ALAPCO Meeting Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Tom Curran, EPA Office of Air Quality.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Significance of Mobile Source Emissions for the Purposes of Section 309 of the Regional Haze Rule Patrick Cummins Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board.
EPA Region 10 Cumulative Effects Analysis Methodology Development Rob Wilson and Herman Wong WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 16, 2003.
A Basis for Control of BART Eligible Sources
Growth and Control for LADCO Round2 Modeling
Visibility Coordinator Regional Haze
CAIR Replacement Rule and Regional Haze
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
FOUNDATIONAL CONCEPTS
WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2, 2008
Department of Environmental Quality
The Role For State and Local Agencies
Visibility Coordinator’s Report
Status of Regional Haze Rule
Western Regional Haze Planning and
MONTANA REGIONAL HAZE VISIBILITY PROTECTION PLAN
EPA Clarification on Regional Haze SIP Issues
Entering Correction Activities for 60 Day Timeline, Early Childhood Transition and Discipline Noncompliance Welcome to the presentation on how to enter.
Identification of BART-Eligible Sources in the WRAP Region
Initiatives Oversight Committee Update on Other Activities
RHPWG – Control Measures Subcommittee Oil & Gas Source Coordination
Stationary Source NOx and PM Report: An Update Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Market Trading Forum Meeting September 19-20, 2002 Snowbird,
Regional Haze SIP Status Report
WRAP Stationary Sources Forum Meeting November 14-15, 2006
State Screening and Outreach Updates
Stationary Sources Joint Forum: Next Steps
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
RA BART Overview Deb Wolfe 8/9/2019.
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Who is BART in Idaho and how do we know?

BART Eligible in Idaho? WRAP Contractor early identification Review of SIC codes against 26 BART categories Reviewed construction and operation dates of units Combined facility/units to determine 250 tpy threshold of SOx, NOx or PM. WRAP contractor Identified several sources as in and several that were maybe in. We reviewed the sources and found on facility had by miss categories and several facilities that were out because of age or emissions. We ended up with seven facilities that were eligible. Potlatch 2-4) Amalgamated Nampa, Twin Falls, Paul, 5) Simplot Don Plant 6) P4/Monsanto 7) Agrium 8) Ashgrove Cement- later determined Ashgrove was preBART

BART the Problem Child! EPA BART guidance – what to do? Lack of authority to implement – develop rules EPA BART guidance – what to do? Idaho’s complex terrain – how to model? Once we were ready to begin the BART process we realized we didn’t have the authority to implement Regional Haze or BART. Through the negotiated rule making process we have a proposed rule that will provide the authority to: Implement BART establishes a .5 deciview threshold for BART subject. establish Long Term Strategies/control measures ability to set Reasonable Progress Goals for Class I areas within Idaho There was a struggle on who to deal with EPA’s BART guidance – should be incorporate into our rule or simply follow as guidance. Decided to implement the basics from early parts of Regional Haze Rule and the .5 deciview threshold as identified in the rule. Because of the complex terrain in Idaho, the WRAP regional model didn’t seem like a good fit for our BART subject modeling. We worked with Oregon, Washington and EPA to develop a 3 year met coverage at 4 km and a 3-state modeling protocal. And now we think there are 4 BART sources. 1 Boiler at each of the Amalgamated facilities and P4

BART Needs The Clearing House – WRAP assistance Consultation with FLMs Need to wrap BART up end of the year deadline for controls and associated emission reductions Modeling Center models BART reductions We like the idea of the BART clearing house. As we move forward on the Amalgamated boilers we need to make sure we are being consistent with the reductions made at similar facilities in other states. We will need a forum and process to work with the FLMs to make sure they are in agreement with the BART findings. Most of all we need to “wrap” BART up. We need to make the BART determinations by the end of the year and get the associated emission reductions to the Regional Modeling Center so we can model. We need this model done so we have a better idea on where we will be setting the Reasonable Progress Goals.

Thanks!