Modality-Specific, Multitask Locomotor Deficits Persist Despite Good Recovery After a Traumatic Brain Injury  Bradford J. McFadyen, PhD, Jean-François.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Association of Functional Oral Intake and Pneumonia in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury  Trine S. Hansen, MPH, Klaus Larsen, PhD, Aase.
Advertisements

The Effect of External Rhythmic Cues (Auditory and Visual) on Walking During a Functional Task in Homes of People With Parkinson’s Disease  Lynn Rochester,
Caregiver Guide and Instructions for Safe Bed Mobility
Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Associated With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single-Case Experimental Design  Marie-Christine Ouellet,
Siu-Ming Fong, MSc, Gabriel Y. Ng, PhD 
Janet K. Freburger, PT, PhD, Dongmei Li, MS, Erin P. Fraher, PhD 
The Validity of the Lag Signs in Diagnosing Full-Thickness Tears of the Rotator Cuff: A Preliminary Investigation  Caroline A. Miller, MSc, Gail A. Forrester,
Janet K. Freburger, PT, PhD, Dongmei Li, MS, Erin P. Fraher, PhD 
Scott R. Millis, PhD, Sarah-Jane Meachen, PhD, Julie A
Mobility status during inpatient rehabilitation: A comparison of patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury  Janice J. Eng, PhD, OT/PT, Sarah J.
The Moss Attention Rating Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury: Further Explorations of Reliability and Sensitivity to Change  John Whyte, MD, PhD, Tessa.
Action Observation Treatment Improves Recovery of Postsurgical Orthopedic Patients: Evidence for a Top-Down Effect?  Giuseppe Bellelli, MD, Giovanni Buccino,
Aerobic Exercise Training in Addition to Conventional Physiotherapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial  Carol W. Chan, PT, MSc,
Development of a Wheelchair Virtual Driving Environment: Trials With Subjects With Traumatic Brain Injury  Donald M. Spaeth, PhD, Harshal Mahajan, MS,
Inspiratory Muscle Training for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Practical Guide for Clinicians  Kylie Hill, PhD, Nola M. Cecins,
The Injury Distress Index: Development and Validation
Effect of Intrathecal Baclofen Bolus Injection on Temporospatial Gait Characteristics in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury  Terry S. Horn, PhD, Stuart.
Curve Walking Is Not Better Than Straight Walking in Estimating Ambulation-Related Domains After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury  Rob Labruyère, PhD, Hubertus.
A Comparison Between Self-Reported and Observed Activity Limitations in Adults With Neuromuscular Disorders  Laure Vandervelde, PhD, Delphine Dispa, PT,
Effect of stroke on step characteristics of obstacle crossing
Sunday Physiotherapy Reduces Inpatient Stay in Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study  Yong-Hao Pua, PhD, Peck-Hoon Ong, BAppSc(Phty), Hwei-Chi.
Relationship Between Hip Abductor Rate of Force Development and Mediolateral Stability in Older Adults  Shuo-Hsiu J. Chang, PT, MS, Vicki S. Mercer, PT,
The Shuttle Walk Test: A New Approach to Functional Walking Capacity Measurements for Patients After Stroke?  Maijke van Bloemendaal, MSc, PT, Astrid.
Marieke R. Benedictus, MSc, Jacoba M
Use of the Peak Heart Rate Reached During Six-Minute Walk Test to Predict Individualized Training Intensity in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: Validity.
Effects of circuit training on body composition and peak cardiorespiratory responses in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury  Yagesh.
A Multivariate Examination of Temporal Changes in Berg Balance Scale Items for Patients With ASIA Impairment Scale C and D Spinal Cord Injuries  Somnath.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
What Would Brain-Computer Interface Users Want: Opinions and Priorities of Potential Users With Spinal Cord Injury  Jane E. Huggins, PhD, Aisha A. Moinuddin,
Mark W. Rogers, PhD, PT, Carl G
Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Associated With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single-Case Experimental Design  Marie-Christine Ouellet,
Aerobic Capacity After Traumatic Brain Injury: Comparison With a Nondisabled Cohort  Kurt A. Mossberg, PhD, PT, Danielle Ayala, MPT, Tracey Baker, MPT,
Hyeong-Dong Kim, PhD, Denis Brunt, EdD 
Are Lumbar Repositioning Errors Larger Among Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Compared With Asymptomatic Subjects?  Malin Åsell, MS, Per Sjölander,
Effects of upper limb unilateral isometric efforts on postural stabilization in subjects with hemiparesis  Anne Martine Bertrand, MSc, OT, Daniel Bourbonnais,
Responses of the Less Affected Arm to Bilateral Upper Limb Task Training in Early Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial   Jacqui.
Jessie C. Janssen, MSc, Lan Le-Ngoc, PhD 
Use of a Combination of Ankle Pressure and SENSERite System to Treat Older Adults With Impaired Ankle Proprioception: A Single-Blind Experimental Study 
Validity of a Functional Dynamic Walking Test for the Elderly
The Immediate Effect of Attentional, Auditory, and a Combined Cue Strategy on Gait During Single and Dual Tasks in Parkinson’s Disease  Katherine Baker,
The Reliability and Validity of the Physiological Cost Index in Healthy Subjects While Walking on 2 Different Tracks  Rachel C. Graham, BSc, Nicola M.
Investigating the Efficacy of Web-Based Transfer Training on Independent Wheelchair Transfers Through Randomized Controlled Trials  Lynn A. Worobey, PhD,
Increasing Patient Engagement During Virtual Reality-Based Motor Rehabilitation  Lukas Zimmerli, MSc, Mario Jacky, MSc, Lars Lünenburger, PhD, Robert Riener,
Balance and Ambulation Improvements in Individuals With Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Using Locomotor Training–Based Rehabilitation  Susan J.
Henri L. Hurkmans, PhD, Johannes B. Bussmann, PhD, Eric Benda, PT 
Spinal Cord Injury and Time to Instability in Seated Posture
Quality of Life of Persons With Lower-Limb Amputation During Rehabilitation and at 3- Month Follow-Up  Diana Zidarov, PT, MSc, Bonnie Swaine, PT, PhD,
Self-Scoring Templates for Motor and Cognitive Subscales of the FIM Instrument for Persons With Spinal Cord Injury  Rita K. Bode, PhD, Allen W. Heinemann,
Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: A randomized, controlled pilot trial  Catherine M. Dean, PhD,
The minimally conscious state and recovery potential: A follow-up study 2 to 5 years after traumatic brain injury  Michele H. Lammi, BAppSc, Vanessa H.
Robotic Resistance/Assistance Training Improves Locomotor Function in Individuals Poststroke: A Randomized Controlled Study  Ming Wu, PhD, Jill M. Landry,
Norms for 15- to 34-Year-Olds for Different Versions of the Finger-to-Nose Test  Bonnie R. Swaine, PhD, Johanne Desrosiers, PhD, Daniel Bourbonnais, PhD,
Caregiver Guide and Instructions for Safe Bed Mobility
Longitudinal Description of the Disability Rating Scale for Individuals in the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic.
Predictors of Basic and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Performance in Persons Receiving Rehabilitation Services  Wendy Coster, PhD, OTR/L, Stephen.
Trudy Mallinson, PhD, Joy Hammel, PhD 
Combined use of body weight support, functional electric stimulation, and treadmill training to improve walking ability in individuals with chronic incomplete.
Association Between Mobility Mode and C-Reactive Protein Levels in Men With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury  Leslie R. Morse, DO, Kelly Stolzmann, MS, Hiep.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Alice Y. Jones, PhD, PT, Elizabeth Dean, PhD, PT, Rhonda J
James S. Krause, PhD, Lee L. Saunders, PhD 
Randomized Controlled Trial of Peer Mentoring for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Significant Others  Robin A. Hanks, PhD, Lisa J. Rapport,
Effects of a simple functional electric system and/or a hinged ankle-foot orthosis on walking in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury  C. Maria.
Factors Influencing Selection for Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Questionnaire Using Case Scenarios to Investigate Physician Perspectives and Level of.
Journal-Based CME Evaluation and Application
Patient Effort in Traumatic Brain Injury Inpatient Rehabilitation: Course and Associations With Age, Brain Injury Severity, and Time Postinjury  Ronald.
Inspiratory Muscle Training for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Practical Guide for Clinicians  Kylie Hill, PhD, Nola M. Cecins,
ACRM News Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Satisfaction With Activity and Participation and Its Relationships With Body Functions, Activities, or Environmental Factors in Stroke Patients  Édouard.
Weight-Bearing Asymmetry in Relation to Measures of Impairment and Functional Mobility for People With Knee Osteoarthritis  Cory L. Christiansen, PT,
Presentation transcript:

Modality-Specific, Multitask Locomotor Deficits Persist Despite Good Recovery After a Traumatic Brain Injury  Bradford J. McFadyen, PhD, Jean-François Cantin, PhD, Bonnie Swaine, PhD, Guylaine Duchesneau, MPs, Julien Doyon, PhD, Denyse Dumas, PT, Philippe Fait, MSc  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  Volume 90, Issue 9, Pages 1596-1606 (September 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.010 Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

Fig 1 Experimental setup showing the walking path, obstacle placement, force plate used to trigger both cognitive tasks (arrow), and orientation of computer monitors presenting the visual Stroop task. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 1596-1606DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.010) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

Fig 2 Walking speeds (A, B) and intrasubject variability in walking speeds (C, D) during unobstructed and obstructed walking. Data are indicated for subjects with TBI (dark boxes) and control subjects (pale boxes) with no division of attention and with simultaneous visual and auditory Stroop tasks. The box plots indicate medians (thick horizontal bars), the 75th (top of box) percentile range, and 25th (bottom of box) percentile range, whereas I-bars indicate full ranges. Outliers (empty circles) represent values that were at least 1.5 times greater or less than the interquartile range. Significant differences (P≤.05) are shown within groups (thin solid line) and between groups (dashed line). Abbreviations: _A, auditory Stroop tasks; NO, unobstructed walking; O, obstructed walking; _V, visual Stroop tasks. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 1596-1606DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.010) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

Fig 3 Clearance margins for lead (A) and trail (B) limbs and intrasubject variability in clearance margins for the same limbs (C, D) during unobstructed and obstructed walking. Data are indicated for subjects with TBI (dark boxes) and control subjects (pale boxes) without any division of attention and with simultaneous visual and auditory Stroop tasks. The box plots indicate medians (thick horizontal bars), the 75th (top of box) percentile range, and the 25th (bottom of box) percentile range, whereas I-bars indicate full ranges. Outliers (empty circles) represent values that were at least 1.5 times greater or less than the interquartile range. Significant differences (P≤.05) are shown within groups (thin solid line) and between groups (dashed line). Abbreviations: _A, auditory Stroop tasks; NO, unobstructed walking; O, obstructed walking; _V, visual Stroop tasks. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 1596-1606DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.010) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

Fig 4 Response reaction times for stimulus 1 (A, B) and 2 (C, D) during unobstructed and obstructed walking. Data are indicated for subjects with TBI (dark boxes) and control subjects (pale boxes) with simultaneous visual and auditory Stroop tasks. The box plots indicate medians (thick horizontal bars), the 75th (top of box) percentile range, and the 25th (bottom of box) percentile range, whereas I-bars indicate full ranges. Outliers (empty circles) represent values that were at least 1.5 times greater or less than the interquartile range. Significant differences (P≤.05) are shown within groups (thin solid line) and between groups (dashed line). Abbreviations: _A, auditory Stroop tasks; NO, unobstructed walking; O, obstructed walking; _V, visual Stroop tasks. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 1596-1606DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.010) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

Fig 5 Intrasubject variability in response reaction times for stimulus 1 (A, B) and 2 (C, D) during unobstructed and obstructed walking. Data are indicated for subjects with TBI (dark boxes) and control subjects (pale boxes) with simultaneous visual and auditory Stroop tasks. The box plots indicate medians (thick horizontal bars), the 75th (top of box) percentile range, and the 25th (bottom of box) percentile range, whereas I-bars indicate full ranges. Outliers (empty circles) represent values that were at least 1.5 times greater or less than the interquartile range. Significant differences (P≤.05) are shown within groups (thin solid line) and between groups (dashed line). Abbreviations: _A, auditory Stroop tasks; NO, unobstructed walking; O, obstructed walking; _V, visual Stroop tasks. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 1596-1606DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.010) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

Fig 6 Multitask costs (A, B) and intrasubject variability (C, D) for stimuli 1 and 2. Data are indicated for subjects with TBI (dark boxes) and control subjects (pale boxes) with simultaneous visual and auditory Stroop tasks. The box plots indicate medians (thick horizontal bars), the 75th (top of box) percentile range, and 25th (bottom of box) percentile range, whereas I-bars indicate full ranges. Outliers (empty circles) represent values that were at least 1.5 times greater or less than the interquartile range. Significant differences (P≤.05) are shown within groups (thin solid line) and between groups (dashed line). Abbreviations: _A, auditory Stroop tasks; _V, visual Stroop tasks. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009 90, 1596-1606DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.010) Copyright © 2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions