Figure 3. Time curves for GFAP, S100B, and tTau release in CSF

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 2 ALSFRS-R changes (A) Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope after 6 months of treatment without (left)
Advertisements

Figure 2. Infliximab treatment effect
Figure 1 Box plot of the venous diameter in lesions
Figure 2. Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit for all participants Change in total PSPRS score from baseline to each study visit.
Figure 1 Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during each round of Treg infusions Treg percentage and suppressive function increased during.
Figure 2 Immunopathologic analysis of all 3 Rasmussen encephalitis cases Immunopathologic analysis of all 3 Rasmussen encephalitis cases (A) Perivascular.
Figure 3 Routine blood analysis during alemtuzumab infusion cycle
Figure 2 Brain biopsy Brain biopsy (A) Double staining with anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody (dark green) and Luxol fast blue (blue) is shown. Loss of.
Figure 2 Elevated antibody reactivities against myelin and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) peptides in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and higher.
Figure 1 MOR103 sequential-dose trial flowchart of study population with multiple sclerosis aPatients received 2 doses of study drug before trial withdrawal.
Figure 2 Correlation between total IgG levels and anti-AQP4 IgG titer
Figure 1 8-Iso-PGF2α levels in CSF of patients with MS and controlsCSF 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) levels were estimated using an ELISA. (A)
Figure 1 Peripheral blood leukocyte subset counts during dimethyl fumarate treatmentComplete blood cell counts were obtained at baseline (n = 34) and at.
Figure 2 Overview of the patient's history and immunofluorescence pattern of patient CSF IgG Overview of the patient's history and immunofluorescence pattern.
Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristics for CSF glucose (n = 225) and serum/CSF glucose ratio (n = 156) as predictors for microbial meningitis Receiver.
Figure 1 Time points of blood sampling
Figure 3 Responder subset (A) Percentage of “responders” (nonprogressing patients) at week 25 after 6 months of treatment; percentage of “responders” in.
Figure 1 GABAB expression in the thymus(A–C) Staining of thymus tissue with anti-cytokeratin (A) and anti-GABAB antibody (B, C double immunofluorescence).
Figure 2 JCV index JCV index (A) Fifty samples of natalizumab-treated patients with multiple sclerosis were assessed twice for their anti-JCV antibody.
Figure 2 CD4+ and CD8+ T cells accumulate in the CSF in GABAB receptor antibody–associated LE CD4+ and CD8+ T cells accumulate in the CSF in GABAB receptor.
Figure 1 Schematic overview of flow cytometry Schematic overview on the analysis of peripheral immune cells by flow cytometry. Schematic overview of flow.
Figure 1 Evolution of blood cell counts during 18-month treatment and follow-up (A) Mean white blood cell count, (B) mean lymphocyte count, (C) mean eosinophil.
Figure 4 Aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) index in time-matched paired serum-CSF specimens: 3 attack/preattack pairs and 7 bridge/remission pairs.
Figure 1 Time course of C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocyte subsets in patients with and without poststroke infections (PSI)Values are expressed as.
Figure 1 JCV serostatus JCV serostatus (A) Serostatus of 1,921 natalizumab-treated patients with multiple sclerosis, with JCV− patients shown in black.
Figure 5 Pairwise correlations between selected patient-reported outcomes and performance tests in patients with MS (A) The number of pairwise correlations.
Figure 3 Comparisons of quantitative spinal cord MRI measures and brain atrophy in RIS vs. healthy controls (adjusted for age and sex)‏ Comparisons of.
Figure 1 Responder rates of patients at 4 weeks compared with prevaccinated levels Responder rates of patients at 4 weeks compared with prevaccinated levels.
Figure 1 Annual trend in specimen type submitted as first sample for aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G testing (serum only vs CSF only vs both) from 101,065.
Figure 2 Distinct changes to immunoprofile in autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) and multiple sclerosis (MS)‏ Distinct changes to immunoprofile in autoimmune.
Figure 2 Reduced frequency of central memory CD4 T cells in patients with PML Reduced frequency of central memory CD4 T cells (CD4Tcm) (p < ), naive.
Figure 1 B cells and plasma cells accumulate in the CSF in GABAB receptor antibody–associated LE B cells and plasma cells accumulate in the CSF in GABAB.
Figure 1 Association between serum levels of IL-18 and hippocampal volume in patients with schizophrenia Scatter plots show a positive correlation between.
Figure 1 Total IgG, IgA, and IgM levels and hypo-Ig prevalence during RTX treatment Total IgG, IgA, and IgM levels and hypo-Ig prevalence during RTX treatment.
Figure 3 Multiple sclerosis (MS) immunomodulatory treatments interferon-β (IFNB) and fingolimod (FTY720) result in global perturbation of the immune system.
Figure 3 Clinical and MRI outcomes by quartiles of increasing CD56bright natural killer (NK) cell countsAll data are mean and upper 95% confidence interval.
Figure 4 Autopsy immunochemistry results
Figure 1 BG-12 treatment reduced total circulating B cells and had variable effects on memory B cells BG-12 treatment reduced total circulating B cells.
Figure 2 Correlation of CSF 8-iso-PGF2α levels with other indicators of oxidative stressCorrelations of 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α) values with.
Figure 1 Patterns of study retention The proportion of individuals actively participating in the study is displayed over the course of the study. Patterns.
Figure 1 Histamine flare in patients and controls
Figure 4 Alemtuzumab-mediated effects on interleukin (IL)–23 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) production in innate myeloid.
Figure 3 Pedigrees of 3 multiplex families with NLRP3 mutations and MS The patient numbers refer to the patients listed in table 1. Pedigrees of 3 multiplex.
Figure 1 Levels of miR-150 are elevated in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) who convert to MS.
Figure 2 Changes in fatigue under treatment
Figure 2 Longitudinal relationship between CSF glucose and protein changes Longitudinal relationship between CSF glucose and protein changes Delta glucose.
Figure 2 Assessment of systemic disease activityTc99 scintigraphy (A) and fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging (B, C) at disease onset 2 years before acute deterioration.
Figure 4. The N:M ratio is significantly increased in patients with ALS and correlates with disease progression The N:M ratio is significantly increased.
Figure 1 Annualized percentage brain volume change
Figure 2 BVL according to on-study disability worsening
Figure 2 Evolution of blood cell counts during interleukin (IL)–7 therapy Evolution of blood cell counts during interleukin (IL)–7 therapy The leukocyte.
Figure 1 Volcano plot Peptides (n = 2,260) showing distribution of fold change and statistical significance. Volcano plot Peptides (n = 2,260) showing.
Figure Avidity of IgG specific for influenza A and B following flu vaccinationAvidity of immunoglobulin (Ig) G specific for influenza A and B before and.
Figure 2 CD56bright natural killer (NK) cell counts in daclizumab high-yield process (DAC HYP)-treated patientsData are medians with 25th and 75th percentiles.
Figure 1 Peripheral blood lymphocyte counts during dose titrationB-lymphocyte (CD19+; A) and total lymphocyte (CD45+; B) counts (cells/µL) in peripheral.
Figure Spinal cord imaging (A, B) Sagittal and axial T2-weighted cervical spine MRI demonstrating hyperintensities in the central gray matter of patient.
Figure 1 Classical pathway and lectin pathway activity in patients with multifocal motor neuropathy and controls Classical pathway (CP) activity (A) and.
Box plot of acquisition times across the various study cohorts.
Figure 2 Effect of DMF therapy on the T helper cell repertoire and cytokine production Effect of DMF therapy on the T helper cell repertoire and cytokine.
Yian Gu et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2019;6:e521
Ingo Kleiter et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2018;5:e504
Figure 6 Multiple target epitopes exist in the N-terminal domains of Caspr2 (A) Multidomain deletion constructs of Caspr2 were generated to determine which.
Gitanjali Das et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2018;5:e453
Figure 3. Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation to target number Sensitivity and specificity of microarray analysis in relation.
Figure 2 Time from incident ADS event to MS diagnosis
Figure 1 Numbers/seropositivity rates of IVIg-naive and IVIg-exposed STRATIFY-2 enrollees* = % of enrollment samples, ** = date of IVIg and/or concentration.
Figure 4 Venn diagram for B-cell Sup proteins compared with proteins from exosome-enriched fractions from a human B-cell line Venn diagram for B-cell Sup.
Figure 4 C5B3 decreased NMOSD mouse model lesions in vivo
Figure 2. Percentage of CD16− monocytes in the blood is reduced during disease progression Percentage of CD16− monocytes in the blood is reduced during.
Figure (A and B) Effect of canakinumab in muscle strength measured in each patient as mean bilateral GF (A) and TMS (B) during the mean study period of.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 3. Time curves for GFAP, S100B, and tTau release in CSF Time curves for GFAP, S100B, and tTau release in CSF Values for individual patients (A–C) and aggregated data for the whole group (D–F) are shown. The change from baseline is plotted for each individual (n = 12) (A–C) while the actual values at the different time points are displayed as boxplots indicating medians, interquartile range, and range (D–F). The time indicators for the boxplots are approximate since the intervals between the lumbar punctures were not exactly the depicted months on the x-axis. The CSF sampling occurred within ±1 week for the 1-month sampling occasion and ±2 weeks for the other occasions. GFAP = glial fibrillary acidic protein; S100B = S100 calcium binding protein B; tTau = total Tau. Joakim Bergman et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2016;3:e271 © 2016 American Academy of Neurology