Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages e7 (February 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Advertisements

Hirotaka Matsui, Hiroya Asou, Toshiya Inaba  Molecular Cell 
MTORC1 Balances Cellular Amino Acid Supply with Demand for Protein Synthesis through Post-transcriptional Control of ATF4  Yeonwoo Park, Andrea Reyna-Neyra,
Global Mapping of Human RNA-RNA Interactions
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Botao Liu, Yan Han, Shu-Bing Qian  Molecular Cell 
Volume 149, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Transient N-6-Methyladenosine Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role of m6A in Splicing Efficiency  Annita Louloupi, Evgenia Ntini, Thomas.
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
N6-Methyladenosines Modulate A-to-I RNA Editing
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
m6A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e7 (April 2017)
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
TED-Seq Identifies the Dynamics of Poly(A) Length during ER Stress
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages e9 (December 2017)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Alterations in mRNA 3′ UTR Isoform Abundance Accompany Gene Expression Changes in Human Huntington’s Disease Brains  Lindsay Romo, Ami Ashar-Patel, Edith.
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Botao Liu, Yan Han, Shu-Bing Qian  Molecular Cell 
Essential Role of TGF-β Signaling in Glucose-Induced Cell Hypertrophy
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages e4 (February 2017)
Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β Modulates Melanocyte Viability
Ribosome Collision Is Critical for Quality Control during No-Go Decay
The Zipper Model of Translational Control
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Ulf Andersson Ørom, Finn Cilius Nielsen, Anders H. Lund  Molecular Cell 
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Enhancer RNA Facilitates NELF Release from Immediate Early Genes
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages e5 (June 2019)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 636-647.e7 (February 2018) N6-Methyladenosine Guides mRNA Alternative Translation during Integrated Stress Response  Jun Zhou, Ji Wan, Xin Erica Shu, Yuanhui Mao, Xiao-Min Liu, Xin Yuan, Xingqian Zhang, Martin E. Hess, Jens C. Brüning, Shu-Bing Qian  Molecular Cell  Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 636-647.e7 (February 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.019 Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2018 69, 636-647.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.019) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Starvation-Induced ATF4 Reinitiation with Sustained uORF2 Translation (A) A delayed reinitiation model is shown for ATF4 translation in response to amino acid starvation (top panels). MEF cells with or without amino acid starvation were subject to QTI-seq and Ribo-seq. Reads mapped to Atf4 are presented in bar graphs. Green triangles denote TIS codons with the solid triangle as the aTIS. Right panel shows the quantification of uORF2 translation. Both Ribo-seq and QTI-seq reads mapped to uORF2 are normalized to uORF1. Error bars, mean ± SEM; n = 3 biological replicates. (B) Illustration of ATF-Fluc and uORF2-Fluc reporters. MEF cells transfected with reporter plasmids were subjected to amino acid starvation for 6 hr, followed by luminometry. Fluc activities are normalized to Rluc. Error bars, mean ± SEM; ∗p < 0.05, n = 3 biological replicates. (C) Schematic of uORF2 translation via leaky scanning (left panel) or reinitiation (right panel). Migrating 80S ribosomes are inaccessible to LTM binding, resulting in the failure of QTI-seq to capture initiating ribosomes during ATF4 reinitiation. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2018 69, 636-647.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.019) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Quantitative Proteomics of ATF4 Translation (A) Schematic of SILAC. MEF cells were cultured in “light” or “heavy” media for five passages before treating “heavy” cells with amino acid starvation for 2 hr. Atf4 mRNA and associated proteins were purified by a biotinylated probe followed by mass spectrometry. (B) Relative ratio of Atf4 mRNA-associated 60S and 40S ribosomal proteins before and after amino acid starvation. Two biological replicates are shown. (C) A scatterplot shows Atf4 mRNA-associated proteins before and after amino acid starvation. The original peptide score (log2) and starvation-induced fold changes are shown in the x axis and the y axis, respectively. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are highlighted with ALKBH5 indicated. (D) Validation of Atf4 mRNA-associated ALKBH5 by immunoblotting using the same sample as in (C). (E) Schematic of zero-distance crosslinking methodology. 4-Thiouridine (s4U)-labeled RNAs were crosslinked to directly associated proteins using 365 nm UV. Gapdh or Atf4 mRNAs were purified by biotinylated probes followed by immunoblotting. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2018 69, 636-647.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.019) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 mRNA Methylation Influences ATF4 Translation (A) MEF cells with or without ALKBH5 knockdown were subject to amino acid starvation followed by immunoblotting. The right panel shows the relative ATF4 levels quantified by densitometry and normalized to β-actin. (B) MEF cells with or without FTO knockdown were subject to amino acid starvation followed by immunoblotting. The right panel shows the relative ATF4 levels quantified by densitometry and normalized to β-actin. (C) MEF cells with or without METTL3 knockdown were subject to amino acid starvation followed by immunoblotting. The right panel shows the relative ATF4 levels quantified by densitometry and normalized to β-actin. (D) MEF cells with or without METTL14 knockdown were subject to amino acid starvation followed by immunoblotting. The right panel shows the relative ATF4 levels quantified by densitometry and normalized to β-actin. Error bars, mean ± SEM; n = 3 biological replicates. ∗p < 0.05. Molecular Cell 2018 69, 636-647.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.019) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 uORF2 Methylation Influences ATF4 Translation (A) MEF cells with or without amino acid starvation were subject to m6A-seq. Reads mapped to Atf4 are presented in line graphs. Atf4 uORF structure is shown above with m6A consensus sequence highlighted. Red arrow indicates the corresponding m6A peak. (B) Site-specific detection of m6A in Atf4 uORF2. Autoradiography shows primer extended products of endogenous Atf4 with or without amino acid starvation. Lower panel shows the Atf4 input determined by semi-RT-PCR and the total mRNA stained by ethidium bromide. (C) MEF cells with or without ALKBH5 knockdown were subject to m6A-seq. Reads mapped to Atf4 are presented in line graphs. Atf4 uORF structure is shown above with m6A consensus sequence highlighted. Red arrow indicates the corresponding m6A peak. (D) MEF cells with either ALKBH5 or METTL3 knockdown were transfected with reporter plasmids encoding ATF4-Fluc or ATF4(A225G)-Fluc. After amino acid starvation for 6 hr, Fluc activities were measured by luminometry. Error bars, mean ± SEM; n = 3 biological replicates. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figures S3 and S4. Molecular Cell 2018 69, 636-647.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.019) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 uORF2 Methylation Influences Start Codon Selection (A) Schematic of uORF2 translation via leaky scanning (left panel) or reinitiation (right panel) influenced by uORF2 methylation. (B) Toeprinting analysis using synthesized mRNAs with or without uORF2 mutation (A225G). Capped mRNAs were incubated in rabbit reticular lysates in the presence of cycloheximide. Expected positions corresponding to full length, uORF2 start codon, and the start codon of the main CDS are highlighted. (C) Toeprinting analysis as in (B) using synthesized mRNAs incorporated with m6A. Molecular Cell 2018 69, 636-647.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.019) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 m6A Guides Global Alternative Translation (A) Metagene profiles of m6A distribution across the transcriptome of MEF cells with or without amino acid starvation. The top panel shows normalized mRNA regions, while the bottom panel shows the distance around start and stop codons. (B) Heatmap of fold changes of aTIS density and local m6A levels (between –20 and + 60 nt) in response to amino acid starvation. Transcripts with or without uTIS are separated followed by hierarchical clustering. (C) A representative example (Copb2) of genes showing coordinated changes of aTIS density and downstream m6A levels in response to amino acid starvation. (D) uTIS codons identified by QTI-seq under the normal growth condition are grouped based on positive or negative m6A signals. Relative uTIS densities of individual TIS codons are plotted in a boxplot. p values (Wilcoxon test) are shown above each box. (E) A representative example (Gadd45 g) of genes showing decreased uTIS density and increased aTIS density as a result of changed m6A levels in response to amino acid starvation. Molecular Cell 2018 69, 636-647.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.019) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Alternative Translation in Liver-Specific Fto Transgenic Mice (A) Metagene profiles of m6A distribution across the transcriptome of liver lysates derived from wild-type or FtoAlb-Tg mice under well-fed (top panel) or overnight fasting (bottom panel) conditions. (B) Immunoblotting of liver lysates derived from wild-type or FtoAlb-Tg mice under well-fed or overnight fasting conditions. The right panel shows the relative Atf4 mRNA levels obtained by qPCR, as well as ATF4 protein levels quantified by densitometry and normalized to β-actin. Error bars, mean ± SEM; n = 3 biological replicates. ∗p < 0.05. (C) Ribo-seq reads mapped to Atf4 of liver lysates derived from wild-type or FtoAlb-Tg mice are presented in bar graphs. (D) Scatterplots showing the correlation of regional ribosome density (5′ UTR versus CDS) between wild-type or FtoAlb-Tg mice under normal feeding (top panel) and overnight fasting (bottom panel) conditions. (E) Boxplots showing changes of regional ribosome density (5′ UTR versus CDS) for transcripts with differential 5′ UTR methylation in liver lysates derived from FtoAlb-Tg mice. Dec and Inc refer to mRNAs with relatively decreased and increased 5′ UTR methylation, respectively. p values (Wilcoxon test) are shown above each box. See also Figures S5–S7. Molecular Cell 2018 69, 636-647.e7DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2018.01.019) Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions