Petar Pavešić, University of Ljubljana

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lower Envelopes Yuval Suede. What’s on the menu? Lower Envelopes Davenport-Schinzel Sequences Trivial upper bound Super linear complexity* Tight upper.
Advertisements

The Topology of Graph Configuration Spaces David G.C. Handron Carnegie Mellon University
Degenerations of algebras. José-Antonio de la Peña UNAM, México Advanced School and Conference on Homological and Geometrical Methods in Representation.
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Section 10-4 Variation and Prediction Intervals.
One of the most important problems is Computational Geometry is to find an efficient way to decide, given a subdivision of E n and a point P, in which.
Approximation Algorithms Chapter 5: k-center. Overview n Main issue: Parametric pruning –Technique for approximation algorithms n 2-approx. algorithm.
1 Constructing Convex 3-Polytopes From Two Triangulations of a Polygon Benjamin Marlin Dept. of Mathematics & Statistics McGill University Godfried Toussaint.
Problems in Ramsey theory typically ask a question of the form: "how many elements of some structure must there be to guarantee that a particular property.
Entropy Rates of a Stochastic Process
Complexity 15-1 Complexity Andrei Bulatov Hierarchy Theorem.
Introduction to Robotics Kinematics. Link Description.
Tools for Reduction of Mechanical Systems Ravi Balasubramanian, Klaus Schmidt, and Elie Shammas Carnegie Mellon University.
1 Last lecture  Path planning for a moving Visibility graph Cell decomposition Potential field  Geometric preliminaries Implementing geometric primitives.
Presenting: Assaf Tzabari
1 CSE 417: Algorithms and Computational Complexity Winter 2001 Lecture 23 Instructor: Paul Beame.
BINARY MORPHOLOGY and APPLICATIONS IN ROBOTICS. Applications of Minkowski Sum 1.Minkowski addition plays a central role in mathematical morphology 2.It.
Lower Bounds on the Distortion of Embedding Finite Metric Spaces in Graphs Y. Rabinovich R. Raz DCG 19 (1998) Iris Reinbacher COMP 670P
1 Category Theory in a ( E,M ) -category Some aspects of category theory, in particular related to universality, can be developed in any finitely complete.
February 18, 2015CS21 Lecture 181 CS21 Decidability and Tractability Lecture 18 February 18, 2015.
The Complexity of Optimization Problems. Summary -Complexity of algorithms and problems -Complexity classes: P and NP -Reducibility -Karp reducibility.
Difference Between Raster and Vector Images Raster and vector are the two basic data structures for storing and manipulating images and graphics data on.
Section 15.3 Area and Definite Integral
Art gallery theorems for guarded guards T.S. Michael, Val Pinciub Computational Geometry 26 (2003) 247–258.
Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity Wayne Lawton Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore (65)
Positively Expansive Maps and Resolution of Singularities Wayne Lawton Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore
12 INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES. In general, it is difficult to find the exact sum of a series.  We were able to accomplish this for geometric series.
Problem Statement How do we represent relationship between two related elements ?
Degeneracy of Angular Voronoi Diagram Hidetoshi Muta 1 and Kimikazu Kato 1,2 1 Department of Computer Science, University of Tokyo 2 Nihon Unisys, Ltd.
7.2 Properties of Parallelograms. What is a Parallelogram? Definition: A quadrilateral where both pairs of opposite sides are parallel. Properties: Let’s.
MA5209 Algebraic Topology Wayne Lawton Department of Mathematics National University of Singapore S ,
Riemann sums & definite integrals (4.3) January 28th, 2015.
5.1 Areas and Distances. Area Estimation How can we estimate the area bounded by the curve y = x 2, the lines x = 1 and x = 3, and the x -axis? Let’s.
Ch 9.6: Liapunov’s Second Method In Section 9.3 we showed how the stability of a critical point of an almost linear system can usually be determined from.
A Computational Approach to Knotting in Complete Graphs Dana Rowland and David Toth Merrimack College, North Andover, MA Abstract We are interested in.
ЛАТИНСКА АМЕРИКА И Колонизирането на Африка. РЕЧНИК: експанзия разширяване империализъм създаване и поддържане на неравностойни икономически, културни.
INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES In general, it is difficult to find the exact sum of a series.  We were able to accomplish this for geometric series and.
Theory of Computational Complexity Probability and Computing Chapter Hikaru Inada Iwama and Ito lab M1.
Algebraic Topology Simplicial Homology Wayne Lawton
FREE TOPOLOGICAL GROUPS AND FUNCTORIAL FIBREWISE CONSTRUCTIONS
Graphs: Definitions and Basic Properties
Availability Availability - A(t)
Graphs Hubert Chan (Chapter 9) [O1 Abstract Concepts]
We propose a method which can be used to reduce high dimensional data sets into simplicial complexes with far fewer points which can capture topological.
LOWER ESTIMATES FOR THE TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY
Chapter 3 The Real Numbers.
§7-4 Lyapunov Direct Method
Automatically trivial fibrations
Chapter 3 The Real Numbers.
NP-Completeness Yin Tat Lee
CS21 Decidability and Tractability
ON THE LUSTERNIK-SCHNIRELMANN CATEGORY APPROACH
Area & Riemann Sums Chapter 5.1
Programming and Data Structure
Higher order Whitehead products in Quillen’s models
FREE TOPOLOGICAL GROUPS AND FUNCTORIAL FIBREWISE CONSTRUCTIONS
How to Get Where you Want to Go
TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY OF KINEMATIC MAPS
NP-Completeness Yin Tat Lee
CS21 Decidability and Tractability
Dimension versus Distortion a.k.a. Euclidean Dimension Reduction
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Function, Domain, Range, Rita Korsunsky.
Section Functions and Their Graphs
TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY OF FIBRATIONS AND COVERING MAPS
The Determinant of a 2  2 Matrix
Chapter 5: Morse functions and function-induced persistence
Theory of Computation Lecture 9: A Universal Program I
FIBRATIONS WITH UNIQUE PATH LIFTING PROPERTY
Riemann sums & definite integrals (4.3)
Fault-Tolerant Vertex-Pancyclicity of Crossed Cubes CQn
Presentation transcript:

Petar Pavešić, University of Ljubljana ESTIMATES OF TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY Dubrovnik 2011 ABSTRACT The topological complexity TC(X) of a path connected space X is a homotopy invariant introduced by M. Farber in 2003 in his work on motion planning in robotics. TC(X) reflects the complexity of the problem of choosing a path in a space X so that the choice depends continuously on its endpoints. More precisely TC(X) is defined to to be the minimal integer n for which X×X admits an open cover U1,...,Un such that the fibration (ev0,ev1): XI→ X×X admits local sections over each Ui . This is reminiscent of the definition of LS(X) the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of the space, and in fact the two concepts can be seen as special cases of the so-called Schwarz genus of a fibration. In a somewhat different vein Iwase and Sakai (2008) observed that the topological complexity can be seen as a fibrewise Lusternik-Schnirelmann category. Both invariants are notoriously difficult to compute, so we normally rely on the computation of various lower and upper estimates. In this talk we use the Iwase-Sakai approach to discuss some of these estimates and their relations. This is joint work with Aleksandra Franc

TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY X path-connected Motion plan for X is a map that to every pair of points (x0,x1)X×X assigns a path α:(I,0,1) →(X, x0,x1). In fact, such a plan exists if, and only if X is contractible. Local motion plan over U  X×X is a map that to every pair of points (x0,x1)U assigns a path α:(I,0,1) →(X, x0,x1). (Farber 2003) Topological complexity of X, TC(X), is the minimal number of local motion plans needed to cover X×X.

TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY A local motion plan over U is a local section of the evaluation fibration U X×X XI (ev0,ev1) sU TC(X) = secat((ev0,ev1):XI → X×X) (sectional category = minimal n, such that X×X can be covered by n open sets that admit local sections) (also called Švarc genus of the evaluation fibration)

IWASE – SAKAI REFORMULATION y x Local section sU:U → XI corresponds to a vertical deformation of U to the diagonal X×X. Iwase-Sakai (2010): TC(X) = fibcat X×X X pr1  fibrewise (pointed) category = minimal n, such that X×X can be covered by n open sets that admit vertical deformation to the diagonal Gives more geometric approach. On each fibre get a categorical cover of X. Topological complexity is fibrewise LS-category.

WHITEHEAD-TYPE CHARACTERIZATION OF TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY For a pointed construction X  CX, define XCX to be the fibrewise space over X with base point determined by the first coordinate. Example: XWnX={(x,x1,…, xn); xi=x for some i} (fibrewise fat wedge) XnX XWnX XX 1n 1 in s TC(X) n  Proof: (assume X normal, all points non’degenerate) Deformations of Ui to the diagonal determine a deformation of the fibrewise product to the fibrewise fat wedge.

GANEA-TYPE CHARACTERIZATION OF TOPOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY Ganea construction: start with G0X=PX (based paths) and p0:PXX, and inductively define Gn+1X:= GnX  cone(fibre of pn). This is also a pointed construction so we get 1pn: X GnX  XX. TC(X) n  1pn: X GnX  XX admits a section. Proof: Show is the homotopy pullback. XnX XWnX XX 1n 1 in X GnX 1pn

TC(X)  w’TC(X)  wTC(X)  cTC(X)  nil H*(X×X, (X)) LOWER BOUNDS FOR TC We can summarize the relations in a diagram of spaces over X: XnX XWnX XX 1n 1 in X GnX 1pn XnX 1qn X G [n]X 1q’n TC(X) n  1pn admits a section  1n lifts vertically along 1 in By analogy with the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category define: w’TC(X):=min{ n; 1q’n X section} wTC(X):=min{ n; (1qn )(1n ) X section} cTC(X):=min{ n;  X(1qn )(1n ) X section} TC(X)  w’TC(X)  wTC(X)  cTC(X)  nil H*(X×X, (X)) Conjecture: all inequalities can be strict.

nil H*(X×X, (X)) ≤ eTC(X) ≤ σ TC(X) ≤ w’TC(X) ≤ TC(X) LOWER BOUNDS FOR TC Similarly XnX XWnX XX 1n 1 in X GnX 1pn XnX 1qn X G[n]X 1q’n σTC(X):=min{ n; some ( X)i( 1q’n ) X section } eTC(X):=min{ n; (1pn ): H*(X  GnX, X) H*(X×X, (X)) is epi } nil H*(X×X, (X)) ≤ eTC(X) ≤ σ TC(X) ≤ w’TC(X) ≤ TC(X)