UNC Transmission Workstream 15th June 2005

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Advertisements

Exit Reform Review Transmission Workstream 07 January 2010.
UNC Modification Proposal 0116 Reform of the NTS Offtake Arrangements Transmission Workstream 5 th October 2006.
“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
UNC (Urgent) Modification Proposal 0044: “Revised Emergency Cash-out & Curtailment Arrangements” UNC Transmission Workstream 11 th August 2005.
OPNs & LDZ Demand Forecasts Chris Shanley & Nick Reeves.
10 November 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Modification Proposal 0086 “Introduction of gas demand management reserve arrangements” 1 st June 2006 Phil Broom and.
UNC modification proposal 0407 : Standardisation of notice periods for offtake rate changes for all National Grid NTS Exit Users Transmission Workstream.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Emergency Cashout Prices and Emergency Curtailment Quantity (ECQ) Adjustment Ritchard Hewitt Gas Code Development Manager.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
UNC Modification 0050 – Storage Monitor Adjustment.
Review Group -140 Thoughts on additional information requirements.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
Modification Proposal 0435: Arrangements to better secure firm gas supplies for GB customers Initial Workgroup discussion 1 November 2012.
Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.
Transitional offtake arrangements – Ofgem Initial Proposals on transitional incentives 6 October 2005.
Workgroup meeting October 2014
Transmission Workstream 7th Dec 2006 Chris Logue
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
SGN Modification Proposal Amendments to UNC TPD OCS Process Long Term Allocation of Capacity for the Transitional Period.
Review of Demand Estimation Times for Modification Proposal 461
Review of System Alerts
System information provision
Review Group 291- Ofgem Update
Transmission Workgroup 7th July 2011
Review of UNC Section Q “Emergencies”
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Transmission Planning Code
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
UNC Trader User – Licence obligations
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
Review of System Alerts
Modification Proposal 0192 – Draft Business Rules.
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
Reduction of Exit Capacity at DM Supply Points
2 hour / 5% Rule Bethan Winter.
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Chris Warner Network Code Manager
Transmission Workgroup June 7th 2012
UNC Modification Proposal 0172 National Grid Distribution
DN OAD Processes: RG 0316 : Offtake Workstream
Modification Proposal 0101 – “Amendment to demand forecasting timings in relation to the Gas Balancing Alert”
Flow Swap Scenarios – Agreed Logic
Demand Estimation - Non Loggable Meters: Issue
Long Term Non Firm Capacity Update
Review Group 291- Ofgem Update
Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Proposed Changes to UNC Section O
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic)
Richard Fairholme Transmission Workstream 4th September 2008
Assured Pressures Proposal
Modification proposal 330
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Nexus Workgroup Mod 0473 Presentation
Additional Gemini API’s UK Link - Class 3 Modification
Optimisation of Entry Capacity Modification Proposal
GT Response to Action AMR014 Project Nexus AMR Workgroup 20th July | Energy Networks Association.
Information Provision for Transitional Exit Capacity
Workgroup meeting October 2014
Stefan Leedham Transmission Workstream 2nd November 2006
Offtake Workstream : 19 March 2012
Capacity validation, renominations and within-day capacity purchase
Proposed Changes to UNC Section Q Emergencies - Mod 035
Transmission Workstream, 1 Mar 07
30th November 2007 Beverley Grubb SGN
Off-peak interruptible service to compliment universal firm/buy-back regime Peter Bolitho.
Presentation transcript:

UNC Transmission Workstream 15th June 2005 UNC Modification Proposal Number 0021 : Emergency Interruption Volume (EIV) Calculation Methodology UNC Transmission Workstream 15th June 2005

Introduction UNC Modification Proposal 0021 is seeking to assign the volumes of gas, associated with potential Gas Deficit Emergency (GDE) Emergency Interruption actions undertaken by Transco NTS, to an effective trade (NBP title transfer) between Transco NTS and the relevant Shipper. The introduction of an Emergency Interruption Volume (EIV) title trade would ensure that the Users’ imbalance positions prevailing at the time of the GDE are maintained. This paper seeks to define the methodology for calculating the EIV.

Emergency Interruption Volume (EIV) Once Emergency Interruption has been initiated the volume of gas that would otherwise have been offtaken by the end-consumer cannot be known and therefore a proxy for the interrupted volume must be generated. This is the Emergency Interruption Volume EIV. A methodology is required that can calculate the EIV for any period of interruption

EIV Calculation Methodology OPNs when available, represent the most accurate proxy for EIVs and can be used if interruption occurs within day. OPNs (when available) have proven to be more accurate than Nominations Nominations do not provide any information about within day flows and therefore may be inappropriate for the assessment of the EIV when Emergency interruption is initiated part way through a Gas Day. Interruption Manager (IM) is used operationally for the DNs to assess the interrupted volume for non-OPN Supply Points. IM uses an algorithm based on historical consumption to quantify the interruption volume

OPN Supply Point Methodology OPN Volume Calculation Process Interruption on the first Gas Day of a GDE Interruption on subsequent Gas Days Bi-directional System Points (European Interconnector and Storage sites) The volume will be calculated as the Shippers operational nomination provided by the interconnector or storage agent. If no OPN/SFN is provided then the calculation methodology for non-OPN Supply Points will be used. VLDMC Supply Points At single Shipper Supply Points the volume calculation would be based solely on the Offtake Profile Notice (OPN) for the relevant gas day. At multi-Shipper Supply Points the agent would provide a default division of the volume implied by the OPN. If no OPN is provided then the calculation methodology for non-OPN Supply Points will be used.

Non-OPN Supply Point Algorithm Step 1 ~ Obtain a list of interrupted sites supply point ID’s and interruption start and end times for the chosen gas day. Repeat the following steps (2-6) for each of these interrupted Supply Points Step 2 ~ Identify whether this site was interrupted during the last 21 days and note which days were interrupted. Step 3 ~ Calculate load… If site was not interrupted on D-1, use demand from D-1 otherwise… If site was not interrupted on D-7, use demand from D-7 otherwise… If site was not interrupted on D-14, use demand from D-14 otherwise… If site was not interrupted on D-21, use demand from D-21 otherwise… Start at D-2 and work backwards to D-21 until a gas day is found where the site was not interrupted. If all [21] days are interrupted, set estimate of interruption to zero. Step 4 ~ Having worked out which day is to be used, get the load for this site for the chosen gas day. Step 5 ~ Using the start time and restore time, only extract the portion of the day that the site was interrupted and copy the portion of the hourly loads needed. Step 6 ~ Each supply point that was interrupted is noted along with its associated reason code (Transporter, Emergency, Shipper), Load type (for forecasting purposes), whether it is an NSL or not, which day was used for the replacement load (for validation/investigation) and 24 hourly load values.

Information Transfer The proposal places an obligation on all relevant Shippers at multi-Shipper offtakes to provide the division method for the EIV for the relevant Transporter not more than [one] hour after interruption has been initiated. The proposal places an obligation on all relevant Transporters to calculate the EIV for all relevant System Points and pass the data, aggregated by Shipper, on to Transco NTS as soon as is reasonably practical after interruption has been initiated.

Summary The EIV will be calculated based on the volume implied by the OPN/SFN The EIV will be allocated to Shippers based on the relevant agents method/data When OPNs/SFNs are not available, the EIV will be based on consumption data from the most applicable historical day prior to interruption