Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (April 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Erman Misirlisoy, Patrick Haggard  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Auguste M.P. von Bayern, Nathan J. Emery  Current Biology 
Bogong moths Current Biology
Henrik Mouritsen, Gesa Feenders, Miriam Liedvogel, Wiebke Kropp 
Volume 19, Issue 24, Pages (December 2009)
Annual 10-Month Aerial Life Phase in the Common Swift Apus apus
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages R221-R224 (March 2004)
From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Coldness Triggers Northward Flight in Remigrant Monarch Butterflies
How Ants Use Vision When Homing Backward
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages R1266-R1267 (December 2016)
Bird flu fears heading west
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Animal Locomotion: A New Spin on Bat Flight
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages e2 (September 2017)
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
The Role of the Magnetite-Based Receptors in the Beak in Pigeon Homing
Infant cognition Current Biology
Emergent acoustic order in arrays of mosquitoes
Keratocyte Fragments and Cells Utilize Competing Pathways to Move in Opposite Directions in an Electric Field  Yaohui Sun, Hao Do, Jing Gao, Ren Zhao,
Ant Navigation: One-Way Routes Rather Than Maps
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Ants use the panoramic skyline as a visual cue during navigation
Longitude Perception and Bicoordinate Magnetic Maps in Sea Turtles
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Annual 10-Month Aerial Life Phase in the Common Swift Apus apus
Nathan F. Putman, Katherine L. Mansfield  Current Biology 
Yukiyasu Kamitani, Frank Tong  Current Biology 
Susanne Åkesson, Jens Morin, Rachel Muheim, Ulf Ottosson 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages R265-R266 (April 2013)
Gal Aharon, Meshi Sadot, Yossi Yovel  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 17, Pages R751-R752 (August 2015)
Aniruddh D. Patel, John R. Iversen, Micah R. Bregman, Irena Schulz 
Animal Orientation Strategies for Movement in Flows
Optic Flow Cues Guide Flight in Birds
Kevin Wood Bieri, Katelyn N. Bobbitt, Laura Lee Colgin  Neuron 
Cornelia Buehlmann, Paul Graham, Bill S. Hansson, Markus Knaden 
Nikita Chernetsov, Dmitry Kishkinev, Henrik Mouritsen  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Restorative Justice in Children
Evidence that Magnetic Navigation and Geomagnetic Imprinting Shape Spatial Genetic Variation in Sea Turtles  J. Roger Brothers, Kenneth J. Lohmann  Current.
Volume 19, Issue 24, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Auguste M.P. von Bayern, Nathan J. Emery  Current Biology 
Michael L. Walls, John E. Layne  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 17, Pages R728-R729 (September 2008)
Humans Have an Expectation That Gaze Is Directed Toward Them
Early Life: Embracing the RNA World
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages R1083-R1085 (December 2013)
Octopus Movement: Push Right, Go Left
Transcriptional Pulsing of a Developmental Gene
Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically
Visually Mediated Motor Planning in the Escape Response of Drosophila
Ian C. Fiebelkorn, Yuri B. Saalmann, Sabine Kastner  Current Biology 
Fruit-Catching Fish Tune Their Fast Starts to Compensate for Drift
Rapid Evolution of the Cerebellum in Humans and Other Great Apes
Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development
How Navigational Guidance Systems Are Combined in a Desert Ant
A Visual Sense of Number
Transcriptional Pulsing of a Developmental Gene
Eurasian reed warblers compensate for virtual magnetic displacement
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
James N. Ingram, Ian S. Howard, J. Randall Flanagan, Daniel M. Wolpert 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner, Peter Thier  Current Biology 
Martin Müller, Rüdiger Wehner  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 514-518 (April 2008) Wind Selection and Drift Compensation Optimize Migratory Pathways in a High-Flying Moth  Jason W. Chapman, Don R. Reynolds, Henrik Mouritsen, Jane K. Hill, Joe R. Riley, Duncan Sivell, Alan D. Smith, Ian P. Woiwod  Current Biology  Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 514-518 (April 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.080 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Circular Distributions of Directional Data Obtained during Return Migrations of Autographa gamma Mean directions from each event are plotted (small circles at periphery). The bearing of the solid black arrow indicates the mean direction of the dataset, and the length of the arrow is proportional to the clustering of the dataset about the mean. (A) The mean tracks of high-flying migrant A. gamma during the 42 mass-migration events detected by vertical-looking radar (mean direction = 202°). (B) The wind direction at 300 m at both radar sites during the migration periods. (C) The mean flight headings of migrant A. gamma during the 37 events with significant common orientation (mean heading = 205°). Current Biology 2008 18, 514-518DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.080) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Mean Correction Angles of Migrating Autographa gamma A correction angle (circles at periphery) of 0° indicates that the mean heading of the moths was identical to the mean-displacement direction on that particular night. Positive values (clockwise from 0°) indicate that the moths compensated for wind drift by heading in a direction further toward the presumed inherited migration direction (PID = 205°) than their current displacement direction. Conversely, negative values (counterclockwise from 0°) indicated orientation away from the PID. Filled circles: events where the mean-displacement direction of the moths differed > 20° from the PID. Open circles: events where displacement differed < 20° from the PID. Solid arrow and lines: sample mean vector (correction angle = +27°, R = 0.96, n = 25) for the solid circles and its 95% confidence intervals. Dashed arrow and lines: sample-mean vector (correction angle = +5°, R = 0.98, n = 14) for the open circles and 95% confidence intervals. The figure shows that A. gamma moths compensate for wind drift when their displacement directions are > 20° from their preferred migratory direction but not when they are < 20°. Current Biology 2008 18, 514-518DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.080) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Regression of Moth Deviation Angles and Correction Angles Positive angles are clockwise (i.e., toward the west of south), whereas negative angles are counterclockwise (i.e., toward the east of south). The data thus indicate that correction angles toward the west actually caused significant deviations in the displacement direction toward the west, producing a displacement closer to the PID of 205° than would have occurred because of wind alone. Likewise, compensatory orientation toward the east also produced displacements closer to the PID. Current Biology 2008 18, 514-518DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.080) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions