Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Advertisements

Th9 Cells Drive Host Immunity against Gastrointestinal Worm Infection
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Acquisition of a Functional T Cell Receptor during T Lymphocyte Development Is Enforced by HEB and E2A Transcription Factors  Mary Elizabeth Jones, Yuan.
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
T Cell-Produced Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Controls T Cell Tolerance and Regulates Th1- and Th17-Cell Differentiation  Ming O. Li, Yisong Y. Wan, Richard.
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Skint-1 Identifies a Common Molecular Mechanism for the Development of Interferon-γ- Secreting versus Interleukin-17-Secreting γδ T Cells  Gleb Turchinovich,
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Andrew T Miller, Heather M Wilcox, Zhongbin Lai, Leslie J Berg 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase VHL Regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α to Maintain Regulatory T Cell Stability and Suppressive Capacity  Jee H. Lee, Chris Elly,
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Targeted Cleavage of Signaling Proteins by Caspase 3 Inhibits T Cell Receptor Signaling in Anergic T Cells  Irene Puga, Anjana Rao, Fernando Macian  Immunity 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Rodney P. DeKoter, Hyun-Jun Lee, Harinder Singh  Immunity 
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Duy Pham, PhD, Sarita Sehra, PhD, Xin Sun, PhD, Mark H. Kaplan, PhD 
Yunqi Wang, Maureen A. Su, Yisong Y. Wan  Immunity 
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Stat5 Activation Plays a Critical Role in Th2 Differentiation
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
The Kinases MEKK2 and MEKK3 Regulate Transforming Growth Factor-β-Mediated Helper T Cell Differentiation  Xing Chang, Fang Liu, Xiaofang Wang, Aiping.
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 100-110 (July 2007) Notch Directly Regulates Gata3 Expression during T Helper 2 Cell Differentiation  Terry C. Fang, Yumi Yashiro-Ohtani, Cristina Del Bianco, Dawson M. Knoblock, Stephen C. Blacklow, Warren S. Pear  Immunity  Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 100-110 (July 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.018 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Notch Regulates IL-4 in CD4+ T Cells (A) Tat-cre induces expression of DNMAML. DO11.10 DNMAMLf/+ CD4+ T cells were treated with Tat-Cre to induce expression of DNMAML. After 24 h, cells were stimulated with irradiated APCs and OVA peptide in the presence of IL-2. GFP− and GFP+ CD4+ T cells were sorted on day 7. Flow-cytometry plots display GFP expression prior to Tat-cre treatment and 7 days after culture. (B) DNMAML expression in peripheral CD4+ T cells results in impaired IL-4 expression. Equal numbers of GFP− and GFP+ CD4+ cells from (A) were restimulated with plate-bound α-CD3, and supernatants were collected after 48 hr to determine quantities of IL-4 or IFN-γ by ELISA. Graphs represent the mean of values of triplicate wells ±SD. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (C) Notch1 induces IL-4 expression. Wild-type Balb/C CD4+ T cells were retrovirally transduced with either the control MigR1 or ICN1 (activated Notch1). GFP− and GFP+ CD4+ T cells were sorted after 6 days. Equal numbers of GFP− and GFP+ cells were restimulated with plate-bound α-CD3, and supernatants were collected after 48 hr for ELISA. Graphs represent the mean of values of triplicate wells ±SD. Data are representative of six independent experiments. (D) Weak induction of IL-4 by other Notch family members. Wild-type Balb/C CD4+ T cells were retrovirally transduced with either the control MigR1 or various activated Notch alleles. Cells were restimulated with PMA and Ionomycin on day 6. Flow-cytometry plots represent GFP+ cells. Numbers indicate the percentage of CD4+IL-4+ cells within the gates. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Immunity 2007 27, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Notch Signaling Regulates Gata3 Expression (A) Diminished Gata3 expression in the absence of Notch. Wild-type or DNMAML CD4+ T cells that were naive and cultured in neutral or Th2 conditions for 7 days were purified. Abundance of Gata3 mRNA was determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Gata3 expression relative to Hprt is shown as a mean of values from duplicate wells ±SD. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (B) Notch1 induces Gata3 expression. Wild-type Balb/C CD4+ T cells were retrovirally transduced with either the control MigR1 or ICN1. CD4+GFP+ T cells were sorted by flow cytometry. Gata3 expression relative to Hprt is shown as a mean of values from duplicate wells ±SD. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (C) GATA-3 rescues the IL-4 defect in DNMAML CD4+ T cells. Wild-type or DNMAML CD4+ T cells were retrovirally transduced with either the control NGFR or GATA-3-NGFR. Cells were restimulated with PMA and Ionomycin on day 6. Plots show NGFR+ cells. Numbers indicate the percentage of CD4+IL-4+ cells within the gates. Data are representative of three independent experiments. Immunity 2007 27, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Notch Binds to Regions of Gata3 Containing CSL-Binding Sites (A) Schematic of the 5′ region of the Gata3 locus. Gata3 transcription can initiate from either exon 1a or exon 1b. The translational start site begins within exon 2. Locations of nucleotides matching the CSL-binding sites are shown in bolded sequences. GATA sites are underlined. Arrows immediately flanking these sites are primers used to amplify ChIP DNA. Arrows drawn above exon 1a or exon 1b were used as forward primers coupled with a reverse primer that annealed to exon 2 to amplify mRNA transcripts. The bottom strand in each box is indicated 5′ to 3′. (B) Notch1 binds to the exon 1a CSL-binding site. Naive or CD4+ T cells stimulated for 40 hr were purified and fixed for ChIP. Antibodies used for IP are a control IgG, α-Notch1, α-CSL, α-acetylated H4 (AcH4), and α-H3. Total histone H3 was used for normalization. Graphs represent quantitative PCR presented as a mean of the ratios of the amount of IP DNA in each sample relative to total H3 from values of duplicate wells ±SD. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. (C) Notch1 binds weakly to the exon 1b CSL-binding site. The description is the same as (B), except the primers amplified the CSL-binding site upstream of exon 1b. (D) ChIP from CD4+ T cells stimulated for 40 hr and quantitative PCR for an irrelevant gene control (Oct4). Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. (E) GSI treatment blocks association of Notch1 with Gata3 CSL-binding sites. CD4+ T cells were treated with either DMSO (vehicle control) or GSI and stimulated for 40 hr, and ChIP was performed. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (F) CSL binds to putative target sequences within the Gata3 locus. Wild-type or mutant oligonucleotides corresponding to exon 1a or exon 1b CSL-binding sites were labeled with 32P and mixed with buffer alone or buffer containing purified CSL or Notch1 polypeptides, or both, and electrophoresed. Gels were dried, and probes were detected by autoradiography. The control probe contained a consensus CSL-binding site. Immunity 2007 27, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Notch Preferentially Induces Expression of Gata3 Transcripts Including exon 1a (A) Expression of exon 1a and 1b transcripts is diminished in the absence of Notch signals. Wild-type or DNMAML CD4+ T cells that were naive or cultured in neutral conditions for 7 days were purified. mRNA expression of exon 1a or exon 1b of Gata3 were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Primers used are illustrated in Figure 3A. Amounts of transcript compared to Hprt are shown as means of values from duplicate wells ±SD. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (B) Rapid induction of exon 1a expression by Notch1. Wild-type Balb/C CD4+ T cells were retrovirally transduced with either the control MigR1 or ICN1. CD4+GFP+ T cells were sorted 36 hr after transduction. Relative abundance of exon 1a or exon 1b transcripts compared to Hprt is shown as a mean of values from duplicate wells ±SD. Data represent two independent experiments. (C) Notch1 has no effect on exon 1b expression. The description is the same as (B), except cells were sorted 7 days after transduction. Data represent three independent experiments. Immunity 2007 27, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 IL-4 Induction by Notch Is Dependent on GATA-3 Activity (A) DN G3 antagonizes Notch1 induced IL-4 expression. Wild-type CD4+ T cells were cotransduced with ICN1 (NGFR), DN G3 (GFP), or control retroviruses and cultured under Th2 conditions. Cells were restimulated with PMA and Ionomycin on day 6 and stained for intracellular IL-4. Flow-cytometry plots show GFP+NGFR+ cells. Numbers represent the percentage of IL-4+ cells within the gates. (B) Summary of independent experiments. Individual points on graphs represent results from separate experiments. The mean of the points within each group is shown as a horizontal line. The left plot displays the percentage of IL-4 cells as shown in (A). The right graph shows the mean fluorescence intensity of IL-4 as an indication of the amount of IL-4 expressed per cell. Immunity 2007 27, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Notch and GATA-3 Synergize to Induce IL-4 Expression Independently of STAT6 (A) Notch1 and GATA-3 synergize to induce IL-4 expression. Wild-type or Stat6−/− CD4+ T cells were cotransduced with ICN1 (NGFR), GATA-3 (GFP), or control retroviruses and cultured under Th1 conditions. Cells were restimulated with PMA and Ionomycin on day 6 and stained for intracellular IL-4. Flow-cytometry plots show GFP+NGFR+ cells. Numbers represent the percentage of IL-4+ cells within the gates. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (B) Notch1 relieves suppression of Gata3 expression independently of STAT6. Stat6−/− CD4+ T cells were cotransduced with ICN1 (NGFR), GATA-3 (GFP), or control retroviruses and cultured under Th1 conditions. GFP+NGFR+CD4+ T cells were sorted 6 days after transduction. Relative abundance of exon 1a or exon 1b transcripts compared to Hprt is shown as a mean of values from duplicate wells ±SD. Data represent three independent experiments. (C) Schematic of the Il4 locus. HS sites are indicated by arrows below the locus. A conserved CSL site (nucleotides matching the consensus CSL-binding sites are shown in bold) is located within HS V. Conserved GATA sites are underlined. Arrows flanking HS V were used to amplify ChIP sequences. The bottom strand in each box is indicated 5′ to 3′. (D) Notch1 binds to the CSL-binding site in HS V of Il4. Naive or CD4+ T cells stimulated for 40 hr were purified and fixed for ChIP. Antibodies used for IP are a control IgG, α-Notch1, α-CSL, α-acetylated H4 (AcH4), and α-H3. Graphs represent quantitative PCR presented as a mean of the ratios of the amount of IP DNA in each sample relative to total H3 from values of duplicate wells ±SD. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. (E) GATA-3 associates with HS V of Il4. CD4+ T cells stimulated for 40 hr were purified and fixed for ChIP. Antibodies used for IP are a control IgG, α-GATA-3, and α-H3. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. (F) GATA-3 associate with regions upstream of exon 1a and 1b of Gata3. The description is same as that of (E). Oct4 was used as a negative control for GATA-3 binding. Immunity 2007 27, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2007.04.018) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions