Pavlos Pissios, Iphigenia Tzameli, Peter J. Kushner, David D. Moore 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CREB Binding Protein Recruitment to the Transcription Complex Requires Growth Factor–Dependent Phosphorylation of Its GF Box  Kerstin Zanger, Sally Radovick,
Advertisements

Figure 5. Both IDs Are Capable of Functionally Interacting with the TR on Positive TREs CV-1 cells were cotransfected with 1.7 μg of LYS (A) PAL (B), or.
Pavlos Pissios, Iphigenia Tzameli, Peter J. Kushner, David D. Moore 
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages (August 1997)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Molecular Evaluation of Vitamin D3 Receptor Agonists Designed for Topical Treatment of Skin Diseases1  Yvonne Bury, Dagmar Ruf, Carsten Carlberg  Journal.
Endogenous Bile Acids Are Ligands for the Nuclear Receptor FXR/BAR
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Mechanism of SMRT Corepressor Recruitment by the BCL6 BTB Domain
Acquisition of Oncogenic Potential by RAR Chimeras in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia through Formation of Homodimers  Richard J Lin, Ronald M Evans  Molecular.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Structural Basis for an Unexpected Mode of SERM-Mediated ER Antagonism
John F Ross, Xuan Liu, Brian David Dynlacht  Molecular Cell 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Tae Kook Kim, Tom Maniatis  Molecular Cell 
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Colin Kwok, Bernd B. Zeisig, Shuo Dong, Chi Wai Eric So  Cancer Cell 
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 1-2 (July 2003)
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
The Flip Side Chemistry & Biology
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms for the Specificity of Hormone Binding and Coactivator Assembly by Mineralocorticoid Receptor  Yong Li, Kelly Suino,
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Coilin Methylation Regulates Nuclear Body Formation
A Regulated Two-Step Mechanism of TBP Binding to DNA
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Inscuteable and Staufen Mediate Asymmetric Localization and Segregation of prosperoRNA during Drosophila Neuroblast Cell Divisions  Peng Li, Xiaohang.
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Dynamic Stabilization of Nuclear Receptor Ligand Binding Domains by Hormone or Corepressor Binding  Pavlos Pissios, Iphigenia Tzameli, Peter J. Kushner, David D. Moore  Molecular Cell  Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 245-253 (August 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00026-5

Figure 1 The Hinge of TR Interacts with the Remainder of the LBD in a Ligand-Dependent Manner (A) Schematic representation of the different domains of TR and a detailed representation of the primary and secondary structure of the hinge region. (B) Mammalian two-hybrid of Gal-TR hinge (204-260) with progressive deletions of TR-LBD from the N terminus fused to VP16 activation domain. HepG2 cells were cotransfected with the above constructs along with G5E1B-Luc reporter containing five Gal4 sites in front of minimal E1B TATA box and treated with 10−6M of T3 or vehicle alone. (C) In vitro interaction assay using a GST fusion of TR hinge (GST-TR204-260) with in vitro translated [35S]methionine-labeled TR-LBD lacking helix 1 (CMXFlag-TR236-461), top panel, or containing helix 1 (CMXFlag-TR204-461), bottom panel. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 245-253DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00026-5)

Figure 2 Full-Length TR Separated into Two Fragments Can Assemble in a Ligand-Dependent Manner In Vitro and In Vivo (A) EMSA of full-length TR (1-461) and TR fragments (TR1-235 and TR236-461) on a DR4 oligonucleotide. In vitro translated full-length TR or the fragments were used in the presence or absence of 10−6 M T3. In vitro translated RXR was used in all lanes. (B) Cotransfection of TR fragments (TR1-235 and FlagTR236-461) alone or in combination with 28T-TK-Luc reporter containing two IR0 elements in HepG2 cells in the absence or presence of T3. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 245-253DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00026-5)

Figure 3 Helix 1 of TR Is Required for Ligand Binding In vitro translated TR204-461 and TR236-461 were incubated in the presence or absence of 10−5 M T3 and digested with trypsin. The trypsin-resistant fragments were analyzed by SDS–PAGE. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 245-253DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00026-5)

Figure 4 Effect of Mutations within the Hinge Region on the Ligand-Dependent Association between the TR Hinge with the Remainder of TR-LBD (A) Primary and secondary structure of the TR hinge region with point mutations reported to abolish corepressor binding. Schematic representation of the deletion and mutation constructs of the TR hinge region. (B) Mammalian two-hybrid assay; Gal fusions of the wild type and deletions of the TR hinge were cotransfected in HepG2 cells together with VP-TR236-461 and G5E1B-Luc reporter in the presence of T3 (right panel) or vehicle alone (left panel). (C) Mammalian two-hybrid assay; Gal fusions of the wild type and point mutations of the TR hinge were cotransfected in HepG2 cells together with VP-TR236-461 and G5E1B-Luc reporter in the presence of T3 (right panel) or vehicle alone (left panel). (D) Yeast two-hybrid assay of LexA fusion of wild type and mutated TR hinge constructs with B42 fusion of TR236-461. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 245-253DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00026-5)

Figure 5 Generality of Helix1–LBD Interaction Mammalian two-hybrid assay of Gal4 fusions containing helix 1 of either TR (A), RAR (B), RXR (C), or ER (D) with VP16 fusions of their respective LBDs containing or lacking helix 1. HepG2 cells were cotransfected with G5E1B-Luc reporter, the appropriate combination of the expression vectors and ligands, or vehicle. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 245-253DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00026-5)

Figure 6 NCoR Enhances the Hinge–LBD Interaction in the Absence of Ligand (A) HepG2 cells were cotransfected with Gal4-hinge and VP16-LBD fusions of TR (left panel), RAR (middle panel), and RXR (right panel) in the presence or absence of Gal-N-CoR RID construct (Seol et al. 1996) and treated with the corresponding ligands or vehicle alone. (B) GST pulldown assay of GST-TR204-260 with in vitro translated TR236-461. Wild-type and mutant peptides of N-CoR IDI, top and bottom panels, respectively, were included where indicated at concentrations of 10 (+) and 100 (++) μM. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 245-253DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00026-5)

Figure 7 N-CoR Binding Induces the Appearance of a Smaller Protease-Resistant Fragment (A) 35S-labeled in vitro translated TR204-461 was incubated with 1 mM of either wild-type or mutated N-CoR peptide in the absence or presence of 1 μM T3. The mixture was digested with trypsin for 7 min at room temperature and analyzed by SDS–PAGE. (B) Full-length TR LBD204–461 (F) or a C-terminal truncated TR LBD (Δ15C) was incubated with peptides and/or T3 and digested with trypsin as above. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 245-253DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00026-5)

Figure 8 Model of the Allosteric Effects of Ligands and Corepressors on the Interaction between the Hinge and the LBD of Nuclear Hormone Receptors The model is based on the released coordinates of the human TRβ LBD with coactivator peptide (Darimont et al. 1998). The hinge region including the helix 1, the helix 12, and the corepressor peptide are drawn as ribbons. The rest of TR LBD is represented as surface. The blue color indicates stable position; the red color indicates instability. Actual position of helix 12 in the apo-TR structure is not known. Ligand is visible in the holo-LBD. The drawing was created with Swiss PDB viewer (Guex and Peitsch 1997). Molecular Cell 2000 6, 245-253DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00026-5)