Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: Sagittal Plane Analysis and the Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Purnendu Gupta, Felix Brassard, Jennifer Schottler,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
F Schwab 1,2, JP Farcy 1,2, K Bridwell 2, S Berven 2, S Glassman 2,
Advertisements

Fusionless Correction for Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Emma Orton BME 281.
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
Sagittal balance in thoracolumbar or lumbar congenital kyphoscoliosis and kyphosis at a minimum of 10 years after surgery : A case series Sagittal balance.
Growth Preserving Spinal Surgery for Scoliosis in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta Lawrence Karlin, MD, Amer Samdani, MD, Anna McClung, BSN, RN, Michael.
In the first 5 years of Treatment, the Charges for Guided Growth Constructs are 30% less than Growing Rods Lindsay M. Andras MD 1, Liam Harris BS 1, Scott.
Comparison of deformity correction and complications with VEPTR and early primary posterior spinal fusion in young children with idiopathic scoliosis:
Short Term Health Related Quality of Life and Family Burden after Surgical or Casting Treatment Hiroko Matsumoto, Nicholas Feinberg, Julie Yoshimachi,
A minimum of 2 year follow up of 22 EOS patients who were treated with 2 nd generation MCGR Karsten Ridderbusch, Christian Hagemann, Ralf Stücker Childrens.
John T. Wilkinson m. d. , Chad E. Songy m. d. , Frances l
Authors: Pooria Hosseini MD, Jeff Pawelek BS, Gregory Mundis MD, Burt Yazsay MD, John Ferguson MD, Ilkka Helenius MD, Kenneth Cheung MD, Gokhan Demirkiran.
ICEOS 2015 Comparison of Weight Percentile Gain with Growth-Friendly Constructs in Early Onset Scoliosis Liam Harris BS1, Lindsay M Andras MD1, Paul D.
Incidence of Proximal junctional kyphosis with Magnetic Expansion Control Rods in early onset scoliosis P Inaparthy, JC Queruz, C Thakar, D Rolton, C Nnadi.
The Rib Construct (RC) has provided secure proximal fixation for management of patients with EOS and severe thoracic hyperkyphosis Alaa Azmi Ahmad – MD.
Final Fusion in Patients Treated with Rib Based Distraction: A Review of Peri- operative Results THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.
Burt Yaszay, MD Jeff B. Pawelek, BS John Emans, MD Patrick Cahill, MD Bo Robertson Gregory M. Mundis, MD Behrooz A. Akbarnia, MD Children’s Spine Study.
The Clunking Phenomenon in Magnetically-controlled growing rods: Possible risk factors James Tan, Dino Samartzis, Cora Bow, Jason Pui Yin Cheung, Kenneth.
Authors: Pooria Hosseini MD MSc, Jeff Pawelek BS, Stacie Nguyen MPH, George H. Thompson MD, Suken A. Shah MD, John M. Flynn MD, John P. Dormans MD, Behrooz.
Complications of Growing Rods - has the Magec Rod overcome all of it ?
Xingye Li, Jianxiong Shen, M.D.
Olson EM, Sturm PF, Jain VV, Schultz LR, Glos DL, Bylski-Austrow DI
Management of Spinal and Thoracic Deformity in Patients with Myelomeningocele Using Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib Ajeya P. Joshi, David Limon,
ICEOS 2016 Pelvic obliquity correction in distraction based growing spine constructs Mathew Schur BA1, Lindsay M Andras MD1, Nicholas R Gonsalves MD1,
Pediatric orthopedic surgeon – Ramallah - Palestine
Adam Margalit, BS Paul D. Sponseller, MD Richard McCarthy, MD
ICEOS 2016 Utrecht, November 2016
ICEOS 2016 Comparison of Weight Percentile Gain with Growth-Friendly Constructs in Early Onset Scoliosis Liam Harris BS1, Lindsay M Andras MD1, Paul D.
DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PROGRAMMED AND OBSERVED DISTRACTIONS IN MAGNETICALLY-CONTROLLED GROWING ROD TREATED PATIENTS María del Mar Pozo-Balado, PhD; Noelia.
Growth Friendly Surgery is Effective at Treating Scoliosis Associated with Goldenhar Syndrome Braydon Connell, Jonathan Oore, Joshua Pahys, George Thompson,
A. Aoude, L. Simoes, S. Aldebeyan, J. Ouellet McGill University
Results of Growth Friendly Surgery Versus Casting for the Treatment of EOS in Patients with Prader-Willi Syndrome Jonathan Oore, Braydon Connell, Burt.
John T. Smith, MD Jessica V. Morgan John A. Heflin, MD
Pediatric orthopedic surgeon – Ramallah - Palestine
Children’s National Health System ICEOS 2016 – Utrecht, Holland
Surgical treatment of severe scoliosis in young children using magnetically controlled growing rods – initial experience in a prospective cohort Benny.
The Effect of the Fixed Sagittal Plane caused by Spinal Instrumentation at an Early Age on the Natural Evolution of Pelvic Incidence During Growth Bekmez.
PELVIC OBLIQUITY CONTROL IN CHILDREN WITH NEUROMUSCULAR EARLY ONSET SCOLIOSIS TREATED WITH MAGNETICALLY-CONTROLLED GROWING RODS María del Mar Pozo-Balado,
Distraction-to-stall ensures spinal growth in Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods Benny Dahl1), Casper Dragsted2), Søren Ohrt-Nissen2), Thomas Andersen2),
Richard Schwend, MD Robert Tung, BS Division of Orthopedic Surgery
John T. Smith, MD Jessica V. Morgan John A. Heflin, MD
Novel approach to multilevel congenital scoliosis in young children
Distraction-Based Surgeries Increase Spine Length for Patients with Non-Idiopathic EOS - 5 Year Follow up Yehia ElBromboly, Jennifer Hurry, Kedar Padhye,
The Use of MAGEC Growing Rods as a temporary distraction rod in Severe Kyphoscoliosis: 2 Case Reports. John T. Smith, MD Mary Scowcroft Perry Presidential.
Early Experience of Frequent Small Increments Lengthening of Magnetic Spinal Growing Rods in Children with Severe Early Onset Scoliosis Joseph Ivan Krajbich.
Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
Does rod orientation and use of cross connector affect spinal height in magnetically controlled growing rod patients? Pooria Hosseini, Behrooz A. Akbarnia,
E-Poster 159 VEPTR Implantation to Treat Children with Early Onset Scoliosis without Rib Abnormalities: A Prospective Multicenter Study Ron El-Hawary,
Evaluation of Pulse Oximetry in Pre- and Post Casting
Top 3 Articles That Changed My Approach to EOS
Can Infection Associated with Rib Distraction Instrumentation be Managed without Implant Removal? A Multi-Center Study John T. Smith, MD* Patrick Cahill,
Sara K. Fuhrhop, BS Mark J. McElroy, MS Harry C. Dietz, MD
Complications of Anchors in the Growing Rod Technique
Garrido E†, Bermejo F†, Tucker SK†‡, Noordeen HNN†‡, Morley TR‡
A New Classification System to Report Complications in Growing Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Consensus Study   John T. Smith, MD, Charles Johnston,
Dual Rods and Submuscular Rod Placement Reduce Complications and Unplanned Surgeries in the Growing Spine: Analysis of 910 Surgeries in 143 Patients Shay.
Is Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) Application a Sufficient Method to Provide Expected Spinal Growth in Congenital Scoliosis? M. Bulent.
John A Heflin, MD John T. Smith, MD
Long-term results in surgical management of congenital scoliosis (CS): A minimum 10 years follow-up study Debnath UK Harshavardhana NS Hegarty J Grevitt.
Classification of EOS Treatment
Modifications on cervical spine sagittal alignment after magnetic growing rod instrumentation. Is there a correlation with proximal giunctional kyphosis?
Nicholas D. Fletcher, MD¹ Charles E. Johnston III, MD²
Is fusion surgery always the end point?
MAGNETICALLY CONTROLLED GROWING ROD IN EARLY ONSET SCOLIOSIS: RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW FOCUSING ON COMPLICATIONS   Francesco Lolli, Elena Maredi, Konstantinos.
HAZEM B ELSEBAIE FRCS, MD
Sagittal alignment of the spine is changing!
Amer F. Samdani, MD Tricia St. Hilaire John Emans, MD John Smith, MD
ARTHROGRYPOSIS AND VEPTR
Simultaneous Vertebral Column Resection (VCR) and Growing Rods (GR) or Shilla for Severe Early Onset Spinal Deformity (EOS) John Emans, MD; Ashley Goldthwait,
Management of Implant Related Infections:
Presentation transcript:

Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: Sagittal Plane Analysis and the Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Purnendu Gupta, Felix Brassard, Jennifer Schottler, Alicia January, Ron El-Hawary, Ben Roye, Jeff Sawyer, Kim Hammerberg, CSSG Purnendu Gupta, M.D. Chief of Staff Shriners Hospitals for Children: Chicago Clinical Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Illinois, Chicago

Disclosures Purnendu Gupta Felix Brassard Jennifer Schottler Nothing to disclose Felix Brassard Jennifer Schottler Alicia January Ron El-Hawary Apifix Ltd.: Paid consultant Children's Spine Study Group: Board or committee member DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid consultant; Research support Medtronic: Paid consultant; Research support Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America: Board or committee member Ben Roye SRS, OMeGA, POSNA: Research support Jeff Sawyer Children's Spine Foundation: Board or committee member DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid presenter or speaker Mosby: Publishing royalties, financial or material support Nuvasive: Paid presenter or speaker Wolters Kluwer Health - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Publishing royalties, financial or material support Kim Hammerberg CSSG DePuy Synthes, Nuvasive

Introduction/Methods Hypothesis: MCGR insertion may have increased risk of PJK due to actuator geometry Methods: Multi-center registry data Radiographic analysis pre-op, immediate post-op and 24 month follow up Inclusion/Exclusion: MCGR insertion with 12 and 24 month follow up

Results Preliminary data: N=28 Idiopathic (n=11) Neuromuscular (n=11) Congenital (n=3) Syndromic (n=3)

Results Preliminary data 2-12 years of age Pre-op curves: (M= 69.8±14.4 degrees) 194 lengthenings (M = 6.93/patient) 16 (57%) male, 12 (43%) female patients M = 7.8 (±2.7) years at initial implant

Results Preliminary data: Scoliosis improved from 69.8±14.4 degrees pre-op to 40.2±15.2 immediate post-op (p<.001) 42.6±14.5 at 24-month follow-up (p<.001) Increase in T1–T12 length from 16.9cm±3.3 pre-op to 19.2cm±3.0 post-op (p<.001) 20.1cm±3.6 at 24-month follow-up (p<.001)

Results Preliminary data: 12 complications occurred in 7 (25%) of patients 4 implant failures 2 device migrations 2 infections 2 neurogenic pain 1 rod fracture 1 wound dehiscence

Results Preliminary data No significant changes in thoracic kyphosis (TK) Pre-op to Post-op (25.4 vs. 26.2, p=.799) Pre-op to 24 months (23.7 vs. 28.6, p=.072) No significant changes in lumbar lordosis (LL) Pre-op to Post-op (-51.8 vs. -45.2, p=.118) Pre-op to 24 months (-48.4 vs. -58.5, p=.268)

Results Preliminary data: T1 slope changed Pre-op to post-op (16.9 vs. 21.2; p=.044) Pre-op to 24-month follow-up (15.9 vs. 21.2; p =.039) At 24-month evaluation, PJK developed in 2 of 22 (9%) patients

Case A: PJK with revision January 2014 April 2014 May 2016 55º 44º

Case B: PJK with revision August 2014 October 2014 December 2016 41º 31º 19º

Conclusions Significant increase in T1 tilt No significant change in thoracic kyphosis or lumbar lordosis Rate of PJK 9% (n=2) Unable to differentiate between 70mm and 90mm actuator with respect to PJK due to sample size Larger data set and longer study time needed