Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 Complex
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor CAR
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Myosin VI Undergoes Cargo-Mediated Dimerization
Joseph D. Mancias, Jonathan Goldberg  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Substrate Recognition Mechanism of Atypical Protein Kinase Cs Revealed by the Structure of PKCι in Complex with a Substrate Peptide from Par-3  Chihao.
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Jingqi Duan, Ling Li, Jing Lu, Wei Wang, Keqiong Ye  Molecular Cell 
Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer 
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Jianchao Li, Haiyang Liu, Manmeet H. Raval, Jun Wan, Christopher M
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Complexin/SNARE Complex
Presentation transcript:

Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 383-395 (February 2010) Lipid-Induced Conformational Switch Controls Fusion Activity of Longin Domain SNARE Ykt6  Wenyu Wen, Jiang Yu, Lifeng Pan, Zhiyi Wei, Jingwei Weng, Wenning Wang, Yan Shan Ong, Ton Hoai Thi Tran, Wanjin Hong, Mingjie Zhang  Molecular Cell  Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 383-395 (February 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.024 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 DPC Binds to rYkt6 (A) Selected region of the 1H,15N-HSQC spectra of the rYkt6 longin domain (∼0.2 mM) in the absence (red) and presence (purple) of four molar ratios of DPC. (B) Summary of the chemical shift changes of rYkt6N (left panel) and rYkt6ΔC (right panel) induced by DPC binding (see also Figure S1). The combined 1H and 15N chemical shift changes are defined as: Δppm = [(ΔδHN)2 + (ΔδN × αN)2]1/2. ΔδHN and ΔδN represent chemical shift differences of amide proton and nitrogen chemical shifts of rYkt6N upon DPC binding. The scaling factor (αN) used to normalize the 1H and 15N chemical shifts is 0.17. The coloring scheme is represented using a horizontal bar at the top. (C) NMR-based titration of rYkt6ΔC (∼0.2 mM) with increasing concentrations of DPC. The insert shows the dose-dependent titration curves of several representative backbone amides of rYkt6ΔC as a function of DPC concentration. The dissociation constants of the rYkt6ΔC/DPC derived from the binding curves are shown in the insert. The chemical shift assignments of selected peaks of rYkt6ΔC were transferred from those of rYkt6N. Molecular Cell 2010 37, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.024) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 DPC Binding Stabilizes the Closed Conformation of the Full-Length rYkt6 (A) Superposition plot of 1H,15N-HSQC spectra of the rYkt6 longin domain (0.2 mM, green) and rYkt6ΔC (0.2 mM) in the absence (magenta) and presence of 0.6 mM DPC (black). For clarity, only a selected region of the spectra is shown. (B) Sedimentation velocity analysis of rYkt6ΔC (40 μM) in the absence (left panel) and presence of 0.6 mM DPC (right panel). The calculated molecular mass of the protein is indicated. Molecular Cell 2010 37, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.024) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Crystal Structure of rYkt6ΔC (A and B) Ribbon diagram of rYkt6ΔC with the longin domain colored in green and the SNARE core in pink, viewed from the top (A) and the side (B). For comparison, the structure of yeast Ykt6 longin domain (light blue, PDB ID number 3BW6) is superimposed to the longin domain of rYkt6ΔC, showing that the binding of the SNARE does not induce significant conformational changes to the longin domain. (C) Surface representation of rYkt6ΔC with the same coloring scheme and orientation as in (B). Molecular Cell 2010 37, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.024) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Longin Domain/SNARE Core Interface of Ykt6 (A) The longin domain/SNARE core interface is divided into three regions (I, II, and III) according to the interaction features of the SNARE core. (B) Stereo views showing the interaction details of the three regions of the longin domain/SNARE core interface indicated in (A). In this drawing, the backbone of rYkt6ΔC is drawn in line model, with the longin domain colored in green and the SNARE core in pink. The side chains of the residues involved in the interdomain interactions are drawn in stick model. Charge-charge and hydrogen bonding interactions are highlighted by yellow dashed lines. (C) Surface presentation showing the longin domain/SNARE core interaction of Ykt6. For clarity, two panels are used, with each panel showing one domain in the surface representation and the other in the ribbon diagram. (D) Superposition of the longin domains of rYkt6 (green), Sec22b (orange), and VAMP7 (blue, in complex with Hrb) with the SNARE motifs of rYkt6 and Sec22b in pink and orange, respectively. The Hrb fragment in the VAMP7/Hrb complex is drawn in blue. The “APTLHL” motif of Hrb is shown in explicit atom presentation. The common structural elements in the core regions (i.e., a β strand followed by a short α helix, βF–αE in rYkt6) shared by all three longin SNAREs are highlighted with a red dashed circle. (E) Structural-based amino acid sequence alignment of rYkt6, Sec22b, and VAMP7 showing that the residues involved in the interactions highlighted with the red circle in (D) are highly conserved among all three longin SNARES (see also Figure S2). For comparison, the corresponding sequence of the Hrb fragment in the VAMP7/Hrb complex is also included. In this alignment, the amino acid residues involved in the interdomain interactions are shown in blue. Molecular Cell 2010 37, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.024) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The DPC Binding Pocket of rYkt6 (A) Close-up view of rYkt6ΔC/DPC complex. The 2Fo − Fc map for the DPC molecule is drawn in blue. The omit map is calculated at 2.4 Å resolution data set and contoured at 0.8 σ. The aliphatic tails of the DPC molecule are drawn in green. The oxygen atoms of DPC are drawn in red, nitrogen atoms in blue, and phosphorus atoms in gold. (B) The explicit atomic representation of the DPC-binding hydrophobic groove of rYkt6ΔC. (C) Surface diagram of rYkt6ΔC/DPC complex with 50° rotation as in (A) (see also Figure S3). The positively charged amino acids are highlighted in blue, the negatively charged residues in red, the hydrophobic residues in yellow, and the others in white. The DPC molecule is shown using the space-filled model in green and purple, respectively. The semiopen hydrophobic groove that accommodates the DPC molecules is highlighted with a dashed oval, and the groove with DPC removed is shown as an enlarged insert. For clearance, the last residue, Asn192, is removed from the figure. Molecular Cell 2010 37, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.024) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Analytical Ultracentrifugation Profiles of the Wild-Type rYkt6ΔC and Its Various Mutants (∼40 μM) in the Absence and Presence of 0.6 mM DPC The sedimentation velocity data of different forms of rYkt6ΔC were fitted to a continuous sedimentation coefficient distribution model with the fitted curves shown as solid lines. The calculated molecular weight for the wild-type rYkt6ΔC is indicated at top of the figure. The buffer condition was identical to that used in NMR experiments. See also Figure S4 for related experiments. Molecular Cell 2010 37, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.024) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Intracellular Localization and SNARE Complex Assembly of GFP-Tagged rYkt6 and Its Mutants Transiently Expressed in HeLa Cells (A–E) Cells were transiently transfected with GFP-tagged wild-type rYkt6 (A), rYkt6-F42E (B), rYkt6-V171E (C), rYkt6-Y64E (D), and rYkt6-Y185E (E). (F) Subcellular fractionation of the wild-type Ykt6 and its mutants showing that the Ykt6 mutants shown in (B)–(E) are mainly bound to membranes. The membrane/cytosolic ratios of the wild-type Ykt6 and each of its mutants were quantified. Values are mean ±SD of three different experiments. (G) The Ykt6 mutants with open conformations have higher capacity in binding to cognate SNARE Bet1 than the wild-type protein. Sec22b, another longin SNARE protein, was used as the negative control. The figure also shows that neither the wild-type nor its conformation opening mutants bind to the plasma membrane SNARE syntaxin 4 (STX4). (H) A schematic model depicting the lipidation-dependent cytoplasm membrane shuttling of Ykt6 in cells. Molecular Cell 2010 37, 383-395DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.024) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions