Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 897-904 (October 2015) Comparison of standard and accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury Ron Wald, Neill K.J. Adhikari, Orla M. Smith, Matthew A. Weir, Karen Pope, Ashley Cohen, Kevin Thorpe, Lauralyn McIntyre, Francois Lamontagne, Mark Soth, Margaret Herridge, Stephen Lapinsky, Edward Clark, Amit X. Garg, Swapnil Hiremath, David Klein, C. David Mazer, Robert M.A. Richardson, M. Elizabeth Wilcox, Jan O. Friedrich, Karen E.A. Burns, Sean M. Bagshaw Kidney International Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 897-904 (October 2015) DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.184 Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Patient flow through the trial. *Reasons for non-enrollment included participation in other trials (n=2), discharge from ICU (n=2), lack of NGAL supplies (n=2), nephrology team not available (n=1), lack of health insurance (n=1). ICU, intensive care unit; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; RRT, renal replacement therapy; SDM, substitute decision maker. Kidney International 2015 88, 897-904DOI: (10.1038/ki.2015.184) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Time from eligibility to renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation stratified by treatment strategy (P<0.0001). Kidney International 2015 88, 897-904DOI: (10.1038/ki.2015.184) Copyright © 2015 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions