SAFE-T Steps to Consensus

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Baldrige National Quality Program The Site Visit Process and Evaluating Site Visit Issue Worksheets.
Advertisements

Notification to Participate in an Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Special Education.
1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
10 Things to Expect Regarding Your Child’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) Meeting.
China Debate Education Network Judging British Parliamentary Debate.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
FRANK ESPOSITO DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SOUTH PLAINFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Effective Communication Pathways in Special Education.
China Debate Education Network Judging Worlds-Style Debate.
 Independent educational evaluation (IEE) - an evaluation conducted by a qualified examiner or examiners who are not employed by the local educational.
Roanoke County Public Schools’ Responsibility for Parentally Placed Private School Students with Disabilities.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
Annual Review Process Georgi Lowe UWSA Office of Human Resources & Workforce Diversity.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT LECTURE NO
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
ADEPT Framework
Definitions Learning contracts are agreements between teachers and learners. A learning contract is a written document that draws the trainer and trainee.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
Judging British Parliamentary Debate
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
What are Parent’s Rights in Georgia Special Education? Parents and students over age eighteen have the right … To Participate You have the right to refer.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
1 Standard Setting for Nonpublic Entities Activities of the FAF/FASB  2006-FASB created Private Company Financial Reporting Committee (PCFRC)  2008-FAF.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
ADEPT Updated November SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 Your SAFE-T Guide Who is becoming your your new best friend?
What is an IPRC? Regulation 181/98 of Education Act
Internal environmental audit procedure Purpose: To ensure that the environmental management system is used and is effective Scope: The entire environmental.
Office of the Disability Appeals Officer Oifig an Oifigigh Achomhairc um Míchumas National Information Sharing Day February2009.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 Interprofessional Health Care Team Meetings OBJECTIVES: Identify key principles and characteristics of effective interprofessional team meetings Identify.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
“I am the Master of My Domain”: The Principal’s Role in the ARD Process Cynthia S. Buechler Buechler & Associates, P.C Stoneridge Road, Suite D-101.
Selection Process Juniors and seniors must first meet the academic requirement of a 3.2 cumulative GPA. Students who meet the academic requirement are.
Writing the BOE Report.
SEPRC Special Education Program Recommendation Committee
Long Beach Unified School District
Auditing & Investigations II
Benchmarks of Quality (BOQ) Training
Controversy Learning goals: cognitive goals social goals
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
Advantages of consensus:
Look Beneath the Surface Regional Anti-Trafficking Program
Leadership Teams: General Guidelines & Suggestions
Version 0.1Assessment Method Overview - 1 Process Assessment Method An objective model-independent method to assess the capability of an organization to.
Supreme Court Essay Format
It All Starts with the Student Study Team
Teacher Evaluation Process
How to navigate Special Education
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Council - Manager Relations
Selection Process Juniors and seniors must first meet the academic requirement of a 3.2 cumulative GPA. Students who meet the academic requirement are.
120 Minutes Session 29 Classifying a Suspect (Role Play)
A REVIEW OF THE MDR PROCESS FOR STUDENTS WITH IEPs
45 Minutes Session 25 Practice: Test Interpretation.
ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. February 23, 2006
Welcome Back to the District Assessment Selection Committee (DASC)!
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
SAFE-T Steps to Consensus
National Honor Society Harrison High School Selection Process-2018
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
What’s your nationality? Where are you from?
Chapter 10 Problem-Solving in Groups
Section 25.4 Working for Community Health Objectives
What is a contract? An explicit agreement of what the consulting team and client expect from each other and how they are going to work together. It is.
Long Beach Unified School District
NCFE Business Administration L2 Communication
Presentation transcript:

SAFE-T Steps to Consensus

SAFE-T Consensus Step 1 At the end of each evaluation period (i.e., preliminary and final), each evaluator conducts an independent review of the dossier and completes a SAFE-T Summary (ET3).

SAFE-T Consensus Step 2 The entire evaluation team attends the consensus meeting. Each evaluator must bring his or her completed ET3 to the meeting.

SAFE-T Consensus Step 3 Beginning with the first key element (1.A), each evaluator indicates by voice vote whether he or she judged the key element to be “met” or “not met.” During this step, there is no discussion. The evaluator merely states his or her judgment regarding the key element.

SAFE-T Consensus Step 3 The team chair records the voice vote as follows: All evaluators agree that the key element is met. All evaluators agree that the key element is not met. The evaluators do not agree on a judgment.

SAFE-T Consensus Step 3 The process is continued until the voice votes for all 34 key elements have been obtained. Those key elements judged by both (all) team members to be met are set aside at this time.

SAFE-T Consensus Step 4 The chair identifies the key elements that all evaluators agreed were not met. For each key element, the team reaches consensus regarding specific reasons for each “not met” decision. Specificity is important so that useful feedback can be provided to the teacher.

SAFE-T Consensus Step 5 The chair identifies the key elements about which the team disagreed. Beginning with the first of these key elements, the team engages in discussion until consensus is reached. If consensus is reached that the key element is “not met,” the team prepares a detailed rationale that supports this judgment (refer back to Step 4).

SAFE-T Consensus Step 5 If the team is unable to reach consensus, another evaluator should be called upon to review the dossier and help adjudicate the disagreement.

SAFE-T Consensus Step 6 The consensus-based SAFE-T summary (ET3) is prepared, then is signed by all evaluation team members. The signature of each evaluation team member verifies that the evaluation process was conducted appropriately, the evaluator participated in making all judgments, and the evaluator agrees with the judgments.

SAFE-T Consensus At the conclusion of the consensus meeting, the independently prepared SAFE-T Summaries (ET3s) are destroyed. The consensus-based SAFE-T Summary (ET3) becomes the official report for the evaluation period.

SAFE-T Consensus The SAFE-T Evaluation Summary (ET3) that is prepared at the end of the preliminary evaluation period serves as a “progress report” to the teacher. The SAFE-T Evaluation Summary (ET3) that is prepared at the end of the final evaluation period becomes the report of record.