Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ER-to-Plasma Membrane Tethering Proteins Regulate Cell Signaling and ER Morphology Andrew G. Manford, Christopher J. Stefan, Helen L. Yuan, Jason A. MacGurn,
Advertisements

LC3 Binding to the Scaffolding Protein JIP1 Regulates Processive Dynein-Driven Transport of Autophagosomes Meng-meng Fu, Jeffrey J. Nirschl, Erika L.F.
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
The ER-Mitochondria Tethering Complex VAPB-PTPIP51 Regulates Autophagy
RhoD Inhibits RhoC-ROCK-Dependent Cell Contraction via PAK6
The Sterile 20-like Kinase Tao-1 Controls Tissue Growth by Regulating the Salvador- Warts-Hippo Pathway  Carole L.C. Poon, Jane I. Lin, Xiaomeng Zhang,
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Marissa V. Powers, Paul A. Clarke, Paul Workman  Cancer Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Wnt/β-Catenin and Fgf Signaling Control Collective Cell Migration by Restricting Chemokine Receptor Expression  Andy Aman, Tatjana Piotrowski  Developmental.
Pseudokiller, Qu’est-ce que C’est?
Marissa V. Powers, Paul A. Clarke, Paul Workman  Cancer Cell 
Volume 137, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Ryang Hwa Lee, Nara Yoon, John C. Reneau, Darwin J. Prockop 
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Kindlin-1 Regulates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling
Distinct Autophagosomal-Lysosomal Fusion Mechanism Revealed by Thapsigargin- Induced Autophagy Arrest  Ian G. Ganley, Pui-Mun Wong, Noor Gammoh, Xuejun.
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages e6 (January 2018)
Autophagy Determines the Path on the TRAIL to Death
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
SGK3 Mediates INPP4B-Dependent PI3K Signaling in Breast Cancer
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Oncogenic Ras-Induced Expression of Noxa and Beclin-1 Promotes Autophagic Cell Death and Limits Clonogenic Survival  Mohamed Elgendy, Clare Sheridan,
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Gloria Slattum, Yapeng Gu, Roger Sabbadini, Jody Rosenblatt 
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Role of PINK1 Binding to the TOM Complex and Alternate Intracellular Membranes in Recruitment and Activation of the E3 Ligase Parkin  Michael Lazarou,
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages (December 2015)
Sara K. Donnelly, Ina Weisswange, Markus Zettl, Michael Way 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
The Scaffold Protein Atg11 Recruits Fission Machinery to Drive Selective Mitochondria Degradation by Autophagy  Kai Mao, Ke Wang, Xu Liu, Daniel J. Klionsky 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Identification of Aneuploidy-Selective Antiproliferation Compounds
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
RIPK3 Slams the Brake on Leukemogenesis
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
The regulatory domain of HSF1 is involved in the pro-apoptotic response to TNF. (A) Upper panel, functional domains and potential DAPK phosphorylation.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Small, Mobile FcɛRI Receptor Aggregates Are Signaling Competent
Suman Paul, Anuj K. Kashyap, Wei Jia, You-Wen He, Brian C. Schaefer 
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (July 2018)
Fig. 5 C9orf72 knockdown disrupts autophagy induction.
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Dengue Virus-Induced Autophagy Regulates Lipid Metabolism
Presentation transcript:

Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 337-349 (May 2016) The Autophagy Machinery Controls Cell Death Switching between Apoptosis and Necroptosis  Megan L. Goodall, Brent E. Fitzwalter, Shadi Zahedi, Min Wu, Diego Rodriguez, Jean M. Mulcahy-Levy, Douglas R. Green, Michael Morgan, Scott D. Cramer, Andrew Thorburn  Developmental Cell  Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 337-349 (May 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.018 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2016 37, 337-349DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MAP3K7 Loss Correlates with TRAIL Receptor Loss, but Not Other Death Receptor Loss, in Prostate Cancer (A) Cell viability of MAP3K7 floxed (white bars) and null (black bars) MPECs treated with chemotherapeutics for 24 hr. Data represent mean ± SD. N.S., not significant. (B) Frequency of homozygous deletions of MAP3K7, TNFRSF10A, TNFRSF10B, TNFRSF1A, TNFRSF1B, and FAS in three prostate cancer datasets. (C) Co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity between MAP3K7, TNFRSF10A, TNFRSF10B, TNFRSF1A, TNFRSF1B, and FAS. (D) Oncoprint of MAP3K7, TNFRSF10A, TNFRSF10B, TNFRSF1A, TNFRSF1B, and FAS (TCGA, n = 333). Each bar represents a patient sample with 150 samples; the additional 183 had no changes to these genes. See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 337-349DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Necroptotic Cell Death Is Ripk1 Dependent (A) Cell viability of Map3k7 floxed (white bars) and null (black bars) MPECs treated with TRAIL, QVD, and necrostatin-1 for 24 hr. Data represent mean ± SD. (B) Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL, staurosporine, QVD, and necrostatin-1 and imaged in the presence of annexin V and PI on an IncuCyte in four fields of view every 4 hr for 24 hr, with representative images at 4 hr and scale bars representing 30 μm. Co-localization of annexin V and PI was determined using CellProfiler and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was determined. See also Figure S2. (C) Cell viability of Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL, QVD, and necrostatin-1 for 24 hr with Ripk1 shRNA (black bars). Data represent mean ± SD. (D) Cell viability of Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL, QVD, GSK′872, and necrostatin-1 for 24 hr. Data represent mean ± SD. (E) Cell viability of Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL, QVD, and necrostatin-1 for 24 hr with Ripk3 shRNA (black bars). Data represent mean ± SD. (F) Cell viability of Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL, QVD, and necrostatin-1 for 24 hr with Mlkl shRNA (black bars). Data represent mean ± SD. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 337-349DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Autophagy Machinery Localizes with Necrosome Proteins (A) Cell viability of Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL, necrostatin-1, CQ, BafA1, or wortmannin for 24 hr or with Atg5 and Atg7 shRNA. Immunoblots show knockdown of Atg5 and Atg7 with β-actin as loading control. Data represent mean ± SD. (B) Immunoblots of necrosome proteins and autophagy proteins, ATG7, ATG5/12, p62, BECLIN-1, ULK1, STX17, and LAMP2, after a co-immunoprecipitation of RIPK1 in Map3k7 null MPECs with and without TRAIL treatment. (C) Proximity ligation assay (PLA) of p62 with MLKL and phospho-MLKL in Map3k7 null MPECs treated with and without TRAIL. Scale bars represent 20 μm. (D) Quantification of (C). Data represent mean ± SD. (E) Dual PLA of ATG5 with RIPK1 (red) and ATG5 with MLKL (green) in Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL or necrostatin. Scale bars represent 20 μm. (F) Quantification of (D). Data represent mean ± SD. (G) Immunogold TEM in Map3k7 null MPECs treated with and without TRAIL. Large gold particles indicated by black arrows recognize antibodies to RIPK1, and small gold particles indicated by white arrows recognize antibodies to ATG5. Scale bars represent 100 nm. (H) Quantification of (G). Data represent mean ± SD. See also Figure S3. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 337-349DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Atg5 Is Required for Necrosome Activation (A) Immunoblots of ATG5, p62, and MLKL after a co-immunoprecipitation of RIPK1 in Map3k7 null MPECs with knockdown of Atg5, with and without TRAIL treatment. (B) PLA of p62 with MLKL and pMLKL in Map3k7 null MPECs treated with and without TRAIL with knockdown of Atg5. Scale bars represent 20 μm. See also Figure S4. (C) Quantification of (B). Data represent mean ± SD. N.S., not significant. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 337-349DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 p62 Is Required for Ripk1 Association with Autophagosome (A) Immunoblots of ATG5, p62, and MLKL after a co-immunoprecipitation of RIPK1 in Map3k7 null MPECs with knockdown of p62/Sqstm1, with and without TRAIL treatment. (B) Dual PLA of ATG5 with RIPK1 (red) and ATG5 with MLKL (green) in Map3k7 null MPECs with knockdown of p62 treated with and without TRAIL. Scale bars represent 20 μm. (C) Quantification of (B). Data represent mean ± SD. (D) Immunogold TEM in Map3k7 null MPECs with p62/Sqstm1 shRNA treated with and without TRAIL. Large gold particles indicated by black arrows recognize antibodies to RIPK1, and small gold particles indicated by white arrows recognize antibodies to ATG5. Scale bars represent 100 nm. (E) Quantification of (D). Data represent mean ± SD. N.S., not significant. See also Figure S5. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 337-349DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 p62 Regulates the Switch between Apoptotic and Necroptotic Cell Death (A) Cell viability of Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL, QVD, and necrostatin-1 with knockdown of p62/Sqstm1 (white bars). Data represent mean ± SD. (B) Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL, QVD, and necrostatin-1 with p62/Sqstm1 knockdown and imaged in the presence of annexin V and PI on an IncuCyte in four fields of view every 4 hr for 24 hr. Representative images at 4-hr time point with scale bars representing 100 μm. Co-localization of annexin V and PI was determined using CellProfiler and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was determined. See also Figure S6. (C) Cell viability of Map3k7 null MPECs treated with TRAIL, QVD, and necrostatin-1 with knockdown of p62/Sqstm1 and addition of either wild-type (WT) p62, mutant p62 lacking the ZZ domain (ΔZZ), or mutant p62 of the LIR domain (ΔLIR). Data represent mean ± SD. N.S., not significant. Developmental Cell 2016 37, 337-349DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.018) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions