LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment criteria and work plan -

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Tier 3 Approaches, Complex Models or Direct Measurements, in Greenhouse Gas Inventories Report of the.

Advertisements

Institute for Energy and Transport B. Giechaskiel, G. Martini

National circumstances and inventories of GHG emissions Mirja Kosonen UNFCCC WS, Dublin.

GRPE 70th session PMP INFORMAL GROUP progress report TO GRPE

The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,

Evaluation in R&D sphere in Ukraine: Real practice and problems of transition to new standards Igor Yegorov Centre for S&T Potential and Science History.

Volvo Technology AB / Volvo Technology Corporation Dept / UW / 25/10/2015 / page 1 Particulates, Brussels, January 2003 PARTICULATES Major Scientific.

CAST Project funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Energy & Transport, under the 6th RTD Framework Programme.

Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.

RDE Working group Brussels, September 2015 Collection of NO x emissions data - First preliminary results RDE working group 14 September 2015 European Commission.

GRPE 71 ST SESSION PMP INFORMAL GROUP PROGRESS REPORT TO GRPE 8 Jan 2015 Informal document GRPE st GRPE, 8-12 June 2015,

International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.

Methodology used by SWIFTLY Green 26th November 2015 Gernoth Götz, Prof. Markus Hecht Berlin Institute of Technology (Technische Universität Berlin) Contact:

NEDC/WLTP correlation process Meeting of TCMV on 17 November 2015

Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.

RDE testing: how to define NTE emission limits?

29-Mar-2011 Working Group on Environmental Accounts Climate Change: Reflection about the role of Eurostat in EU mitigation and adaptation policies Working.

25 January 2016 European Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC)

Evaluation of candidate procedures - Status & Reporting - RDE-LDV working group 28 June 2012, Brussels, EU Martin Weiss Pierre Bonnel DG - Joint Research.

DG ENTR, 08 September 2011, Brussels, EC Pierre Bonnel Alessandro Marotta Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre (JRC) IES - Institute for Energy and Transport.

Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service NON-EXHAUST PARTICLE EMISSIONS.

Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.

Alternative fuels under the IEE programme

Environmental Health Management (EN481)

CAFE SG 23 November Brussels

Evaluation of PEMS tests Veh 01 & Veh 02 with the CLEAR Method

Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4

RDE Regulation Commission Meeting

RDE Task Force Meeting, 7th January 2014

CLEAR Graz Stefan Hausberger, Nikolaus Furian

RDE-LDV working group Vehicle test plan 2013

RDE Task Force Meeting, 28th November 2013, Brussels

28th of November 2013, Brussels

Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions

Pems route and parameters

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Drafting of physical PEMS protocol –

Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified

Input ACEA Boundary Conditions.

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Released datasets -

Driving Indices and correction of test cycle flexibilities

Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven

Additional RDE trip indicator(s)

Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics

Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven

RDE Discussion of Conformity Factors - JRC views on the ACEA propsal - - August 2015 – RDE Data Evaluation group European Commission - Joint Research Centre.

Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.

Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified

Revision of the Work Plan

PN-PEMS Progress update

Informal document GRPE-78-23

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Released datasets -

RDE testing of hybrid vehicles Contribution to the RDE working group

16th of November 2013, Brussels

Real Driving Emissions IWG Recommendations for Data Collection & EU Dataset

Background During last GRPE meeting, EU, Japan and Korea requested the creation of an RDE IWG The GRPE accepted the proposal during its June 2018 meeting.

Work plan and next steps – RDE-LDV working group

Real Driving Emissions

European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit

Comparing EMROAD and the ACEA RDE Evaluation Tool

Boundary conditions - Status

RDE-LDV working group 13 April 2012 Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss

Project on translating and testing a victimisation survey module

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment of RDE data evaluation methods: Set-up of "reference database“ - 16th of September 2013, Brussels Pierre Bonnel.

Informal document GRPE-77-30

RDE-LDV working group 20 November 2012, Brussels, EU Pierre Bonnel

Informal document GRPE-79-20

Scene setter European Commission DG Environment

RDE Task Force Meeting, 16th December 2013, Brussels

Working Group “Real-Driving Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles” Work Progress – December

Informal document GRPE Rev.1

Presentation transcript:

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment criteria and work plan - 21st of October 2013, Brussels European Commission DG - Joint Research Centre (JRC) - IET - Institute for Energy and Transport

Outline Objectives of the discussion Assessment criteria Analysis to be conducted (discussion)

Objectives of the discussion To review the assessment criteria and to list those who are relevant for the DE Task Force To discuss and to propose the analysis required to provide the supporting information needed for the assessment criteria, with the aim to develop guidelines for the involved experts To (possibly) distribute some work within the participating organizations (The major part shall remain with the method ‘owners’ to compile the results for their method and all vehicles) If necessary, the proposed guidelines will be reviewed and adapted at each task force meeting

Assessment criteria (1) ROBUSTNESS: Ability to assess RDE performance Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions Ability to evaluate testing conditions (trip) Data coverage Robustness against uncertainties of data acquisition and data evaluation Technological neutrality

Assessment criteria (2) PRACTICABILITY: PEMS testing effort Availability and accuracy/reliability of input parameters Simplicity of calculation steps Possibility for independent RDE testing Flexibility to be adapted to future emissions legislation

Quality and transparency Elements: A common database is used to conduct the analysis The data within the database contains the elements for excluding the cold start and the DPF regeneration For the upcoming analysis to be presented: The version of the methods shall be indicated The method owners shall maintain the traceability of the versions and list the changes and their potential implications upon the final results The final results shall be aggregated for the last and best possible version of the method

Assessment criteria & Analysis (1) Ability to assess RDE performance Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions Ability to evaluate testing conditions (trip) Data coverage Results required: (A) Emissions (g/km) (B) [Weighted and for the U/R/M] (C) Generic trip characteristics (All methods) (C) Results from indicators (method specific or not) (D) Results from indicators (method specific or not) Expected: The results from the (C) or (D) indicators shall be reflected/indicated on (A) and (B) results.

Assessment criteria & Analysis (2) Robustness against uncertainties of data acquisition and data evaluation Case studies (analysis not required for all tests/vehicles) Data uncertainties: Sensitivity studies Robustness of data evaluation 1: Performance of the DE methods for specific testing situations Roundtrip clockwise and counterclockwise driving Aggressive versus soft or normal driving style Aggressive driving during part of a test Other? Robustness of data evaluation 2: Sensitivity of the method DE to their design parameters TNO Binning: ? CLEAR: target function? MAW: Averaging quantity, Curve and CO2 tolerances

Assessment criteria & Analysis (3) Technology neutrality Description of the principles envisaged to adapt the methods to hybrid powertrains and alternative fuels (Discussion) Implications in terms of testing (Parameters and quality required) (Possibly) case studies with results (as for criteria A, B, C, D)