Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Isabella Maiellaro, Martin J. Lohse, Robert J. Kittel, Davide Calebiro 
Alla Y. Karpova, Dougal G.R. Tervo, Noah W. Gray, Karel Svoboda  Neuron 
Ca2+/Calcineurin-Dependent Inactivation of Neuronal L-Type Ca2+ Channels Requires Priming by AKAP-Anchored Protein Kinase A  Philip J. Dittmer, Mark L.
Lori Redmond, Amir H. Kashani, Anirvan Ghosh  Neuron 
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Daniel Meyer, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Volker Scheuss  Neuron 
DAPK1 Mediates LTD by Making CaMKII/GluN2B Binding LTP Specific
Attenuation of Synaptic Potentials in Dendritic Spines
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (April 2017)
Hiroshi Makino, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Aleksander Sobczyk, Karel Svoboda  Neuron 
Andres Barria, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Spontaneous Activity Drives Local Synaptic Plasticity In Vivo
The Retromer Supports AMPA Receptor Trafficking During LTP
Glutamate Receptor Modulation Is Restricted to Synaptic Microdomains
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
A Role for Stargazin in Experience-Dependent Plasticity
Subcellular Dynamics of Type II PKA in Neurons
Subunit-Specific NMDA Receptor Trafficking to Synapses
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Visualization of Subunit-Specific Delivery of Glutamate Receptors to Postsynaptic Membrane during Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation  Hiromitsu Tanaka,
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Charlene Depry, Sohum Mehta, Ruojing Li, Jin Zhang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Sequential Steps of CRAC Channel Activation
Arvind Govindarajan, Inbal Israely, Shu-Ying Huang, Susumu Tonegawa 
Experience-Dependent Equilibration of AMPAR-Mediated Synaptic Transmission during the Critical Period  Kyung-Seok Han, Samuel F. Cooke, Weifeng Xu  Cell.
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Shen Tang, Ryohei Yasuda  Neuron 
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Volume 108, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Bo Li, Ran-Sook Woo, Lin Mei, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
PKA-GluA1 Coupling via AKAP5 Controls AMPA Receptor Phosphorylation and Cell- Surface Targeting during Bidirectional Homeostatic Plasticity  Graham H.
Protein Kinase D Inhibitors Uncouple Phosphorylation from Activity by Promoting Agonist-Dependent Activation Loop Phosphorylation  Maya T. Kunkel, Alexandra C.
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Andrea McQuate, Elena Latorre-Esteves, Andres Barria  Cell Reports 
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
The PAR-6 Polarity Protein Regulates Dendritic Spine Morphogenesis through p190 RhoGAP and the Rho GTPase  Huaye Zhang, Ian G. Macara  Developmental Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
John M Schmitt, Philip J.S Stork  Molecular Cell 
Takashi Hayashi, Gavin Rumbaugh, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Teemu P. Miettinen, Mikael Björklund  Cell Reports 
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (June 2008)
Ca2+/Calcineurin-Dependent Inactivation of Neuronal L-Type Ca2+ Channels Requires Priming by AKAP-Anchored Protein Kinase A  Philip J. Dittmer, Mark L.
Subunit-Specific Rules Governing AMPA Receptor Trafficking to Synapses in Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons  Song-Hai Shi, Yasunori Hayashi, José A. Esteban,
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Arc/Arg3.1 Mediates Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling of AMPA Receptors
Allosteric Regulation of NCLX by Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Links the Metabolic State and Ca2+ Signaling in Mitochondria  Marko Kostic, Tomer Katoshevski,
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 617-629 (April 2017) Liberated PKA Catalytic Subunits Associate with the Membrane via Myristoylation to Preferentially Phosphorylate Membrane Substrates  Shane E. Tillo, Wei-Hong Xiong, Maho Takahashi, Sheng Miao, Adriana L. Andrade, Dale A. Fortin, Guang Yang, Maozhen Qin, Barbara F. Smoody, Philip J.S. Stork, Haining Zhong  Cell Reports  Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 617-629 (April 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 19, 617-629DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A Fraction of PKA-C Dissociated from PKA-R upon Activation (A) Schematic of the FRET/FLIM-based measurement of PKA dissociation. C, PKA-C; G, GFP; R, PKA-RIIβ; sR, sREACh. (B and C) Representative 2pFLIM images (B) and quantification (C) of PKA dissociation in the presence of norepinephrine (NE) or forskolin and IBMX (F + I). n = 8 cells. (D and E) Representative images (D) and quantifications (E) of PKA-C-EGFP and PKA-RIIβ-EGFP localizations in the dendrites of CA1 neurons in cultured hippocampal slices. The red cytosolic marker mCherry was co-expressed to reveal the neuronal morphology. n = 69/11 (spines/cells) for PKA-C and 25/6 for PKA-RIIβ. See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell Reports 2017 19, 617-629DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Activated PKA-C Moved More Slowly than a Cytosolic Protein via Its N-Terminal Myristoylation (A) Representative image series of two-photon-mediated photoactivation experiments of wild-type and non-myristoylated (nm) PKA-C fused to paGFP, as shown in green, in dendritic spines of CA1 neurons. Untagged PKA-RIIβ and mCherry were co-expressed. Twenty micromolar norepinephrine was bath applied to activate PKA. paGFP was photoactivated at time zero nearly instantaneously at the spine head (white dash box). (B) Representative fluorescence decay curves for spines expressing the indicated constructs in the presence of norepinephrine. (C) Collective data of the spine residence times for the indicated constructs. Where indicated, norepinephrine or forskolin and IBMX were added. The colors correspond to those in (B). n = 193/10 (spines/cells) for paGFP; 148/9 for PKA-C with norepinephrine; 157/8 for PKA-C with forskolin and IBMX; 208/11 for HRas; 99/5 for KRas; 126/7 for MARCKS; and 96/11 for nmPKA-C with norepinephrine. (D) Analysis of determinants of PKA-C diffusion. Forskolin and IBMX were added where stimulation of PKA is needed. n = 111/5 (spines/cells) for nmPKA-C; 100/7 for altPKA-C; 161/8 for PKA-C-S11A (S11A); 136/7 for PKA-C-S11D (S11D); 40/4 for PKA-Cn; and 50/5 for nmPKA-Cn. See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2017 19, 617-629DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 N-Terminal Myristoylation Targeted PKA-C to the Plasma Membrane in Neurons (A) (Top) Representative single z plane images of wild-type PKA-C distributions at rest and after stimulation by forskolin and IBMX in the primary apical dendrite of a CA1 neuron. (Bottom) Fluorescence line profiles along the white dashed lines in the top images for PKA-C (green) and the cytosol marker (red) are shown. The black dashed lines mark 30% of the maximum red fluorescence. The gray bars indicate the positions of measurements. (B) Averaged MEIs for the indicated constructs before and after stimulation. n = 8 cells for PKA-Cn, 11 for PKA-C, 6 for PKA-RIIβ, 6 for nmPKA-C, 6 for altPKA-C, and 5 for PKA-C co-expressed with PKA-RIIβ-Δ2-5. Statistical significance was tested using the Wilcoxon signed rank test as the data were linked within each group. (C and D) Representative 2pFLIM images (C) and baseline-subtracted EGFP lifetimes (D) of hippocampal pyramidal neurons expressing the indicated FRET donor-acceptor combination at the baseline and stimulated conditions. See also Figures S4–S6. Cell Reports 2017 19, 617-629DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Low Mobility of PKA-C Did Not Require AKAP Binding (A and B) Averaged fluorescence decay curves (A) and spine-residence times (B) for the indicated construct combinations before and after forskolin/IBMX stimulation. The data for PKA-C-paGFP/RIIβ after stimulation are same as that in Figure 1. n = (spines/cells) 57/8 for PKA-C-paGFP/RIIβ-Δ2-5 and 51/9 for RIIβ-Δ2-5-paGFP. Cell Reports 2017 19, 617-629DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Membrane-Associated AKAR5 Exhibited Higher Sensitivity than Cytosol AKAR5 to Stimulations of Endogenous PKA Activity (A) Representative two-photon fluorescence intensity image (left) and 2pFLIM image series (right) of HEK293 cells expressing either cyt-AKAR5 alone or co-expressing mAKAR5 with mCherry-histone2b. (B) Collective lifetime changes of m-AKAR5 and cyt-AKAR5 in response to 0.1 μM norepinephrine followed by forskolin and IBMX. n = 13 for m-AKAR5 and 9 for cyt-AKAR5. (C) Lifetime responses of cyt-AKAR5 and m-AKAR5 to treatment with 100 nM okadaic acid (OA) followed by forskolin and IBMX. n = 20 each. (D) Lifetime changes of AKAR5′ and m-AKAR5′ in neurons in response to 0.3 μM norepinephrine normalized to maximal responses induced by forskolin and IBMX. n = 5 for both constructs. Cell Reports 2017 19, 617-629DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 PKA Preferentially Phosphorylated a Membrane-Bound Substrate in an AKAP-Independent and Myristoylation-Dependent Manner (A) Schematic illustrations of the substrate constructs. (B and C) Representative western blots (B) and quantifications (C) of S845 phosphorylation of the indicated constructs in HEK cells, which underwent the indicated stimulations. n = 5 independent experiments for EGFP-GluA1, 4 for EGFP-GluA1c, and 5 for CD4-EGFP-GluA1c. (D and E) Representative western blots (D) and collective results (E) for S845 phosphorylation of GluA1 and GluA1c carried out in primary rat cortical neuronal cultures. (F and G) Representative western blots (F) and collective results (G) of S845 phosphorylation of the indicated constructs in HEK cells, which underwent the indicated stimulations, with or without pre-incubation with St-Ht31. n = 5 for norepinephrine and 4 for F + I. (H and I) Representative western blots (H) and collective results (I) of co-IP experiments with or without St-Ht31 treatment. PKA-C and AKAP5 were co-expressed with wild-type or mutant PKA-RIIβ as indicated. n = 4. (J) Representative western blots from HEK293 cells expressing PKA-RIIβ, EGFP-GluA1, and EGFP-GluA1c together with wild-type PKA-C or nmPKA-C treated with 1 μM NE or forskolin/IBMX as indicated. (K) Collective results of the relative phosphorylation levels for GluA1 (top) and GluA1c (bottom). n = 6. (L) MPPIs for wild-type PKA-C and nmPKA-C across different treatment conditions. Cell Reports 2017 19, 617-629DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The N-Terminal Myristoylation of PKA-C Is Required for Supporting Normal Synaptic Plasticity (A–C) Representative images (A), collective time courses (B), and the degree of lasting potentiation (C), as measured at the shaded time points in (B). The gray circles in (A) indicate the uncaging position. Neurons were transfected with EGFP, PKA-C-EGFP/RIIβ/mCherry, or nmPKA-C-EGFP/RIIβ/mCherry as indicated. (D and E) Representative traces (red) normalized to the control (blue) and scatterplots of paired AMPA (D) and NMDA (E) currents from neighboring untransfected CA1 neurons paired with those transfected with sh-PKA-C (labeled as shRNA) and the indicated shRNA-resistant rescuing constructs. Statistical significance was tested using a paired t test. See also Figure S7. Cell Reports 2017 19, 617-629DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.070) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions