Crystal Structure of Protein Isoaspartyl Methyltransferase

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Advertisements

Crystal Structure of Protein Isoaspartyl Methyltransferase
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Tsan Xiao, Par Towb, Steven A. Wasserman, Stephen R. Sprang  Cell 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
The 1.85 Å Structure of Vaccinia Protein VP39: A Bifunctional Enzyme That Participates in the Modification of Both mRNA Ends  Alec E Hodel, Paul D Gershon,
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages (May 1998)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Crystal Structure of E. coli YhbY
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (November 2002)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Getting the Adrenaline Going
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
The structure of the C-terminal domain of methionine synthase: presenting S- adenosylmethionine for reductive methylation of B12  Melinda M Dixon, Sha.
The first step in sugar transport: crystal structure of the amino terminal domain of enzyme I of the E. coli PEP: sugar phosphotransferase system and.
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The crystal structure of the flavin containing enzyme dihydroorotate dehydrogenase A from Lactococcus lactis  Paul Rowland, Finn S Nielsen, Kaj Frank.
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Restriction Enzyme BsoBI–DNA Complex
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Luhua Lai, Hisao Yokota, Li-Wei Hung, Rosalind Kim, Sung-Hou Kim 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Crystal Structure of Protein Isoaspartyl Methyltransferase Matthew M Skinner, Joseph M Puvathingal, Richard L Walter, Alan M Friedman  Structure  Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 1189-1201 (November 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00522-0

Figure 1 Protein Deamidation, Isoaspartyl Formation, and the Repair Cycle Catalyzed by PIMT The succinimide-based mechanism for deamidation and isoaspartyl formation was originally developed in studies on model amides [2]. The protein repair cycle of PIMT is as proposed [11, 12] Structure 2000 8, 1189-1201DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00522-0)

Figure 2 Cα Backbone and Secondary Structure Elements of T. maritima PIMT (a) Stereo diagram of the Cα backbone. The N and C termini and every tenth residue are marked. AdoHcy is shown as a stick model with the Sδ atom, the site of methyl group transfer, drawn as a white sphere. The approximate locations of the East and West Rims are indicated. (b) Stereo diagram of secondary structure elements. For clarity not all secondary structure elements are labeled. AdoHcy is drawn as in (a). This figure was prepared using MOLSCRIPT [59] Structure 2000 8, 1189-1201DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00522-0)

Figure 3 Structure and Sequence Conservation in the AdoMet-MTase Family (a) Topology diagrams of representative AdoMet-MTases: catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT, 1vid) [30], the TaqI (2ADM)[60] and HhaI (10MH)[36] DNA methyltransferases, the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase from S. typhimurium (CheR, 1AF7) [29], and T. maritima PIMT. Helices and strands that run perpendicular to the plane of the figure are drawn as circles and triangles, respectively, while helices and strands running parallel to the figure are depicted as arrows and cylinders. Triangles pointing down indicate a strand whose C terminus is towards the viewer. Strands and helices are labeled according to the uniform nomenclature for AdoMet-MTases [28, 29]. The helix we call α5 has also been called αZ. The dashed lines in M. HhaI and M. TaqI indicate the additional target recognition domain. The elements encircled by the dashed line in PIMT represent the C-terminal subdomain that is unique to T. maritima. (b) A portion of the structure-based sequence alignment of the AdoMet-MTases. Structures were superimposed as described in Experimental Procedures (Table 3) using the lsq_explicit and lsq_improve options in the program O [49]. Only the core methyltransferase fold and the often conserved βb/α5 extension are shown. The secondary structural elements of T. maritima PIMT are shown below the amino acid sequence. Boxed residues represent regions of structural alignment, while the smaller type indicates those sequences outside of the aligned regions. Invariant residues are in inverse type, while highly conserved to less conserved residues as determined by MaxHom [61] are shaded from dark gray to lighter gray. Three sequence motifs conserved among the AdoMet-MTases [33] are indicated along with the most frequent residue at each position. The crosshatched regions represent differences in sequence order relative to T. maritima PIMT. This panel was prepared with the program ALSCRIPT [62]. (c) Sequence conservation of the methyltransferase family plotted on the structure of T. maritima PIMT. Sequence conservation as in (b) was shaded from white (high conservation) to dark blue (low conservation). Regions that have no structural alignment are shown in red. The approximate locations of the three conserved MTase motifs are indicated. This panel was prepared with GRASP [52] Structure 2000 8, 1189-1201DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00522-0)

Figure 4 Structure-Based Alignment of PIMT Sequences from Various Organisms Aligned sequences (see text) representing organisms from eubacteria (top), archaea (middle), and eukaryota (bottom) are shown. PIMT homologs are those of Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori from the eubacteria; Pyrococcus abyssi, Pyrococcus horikoshii, Archaeoglobus fulgidus, Methanococcus jannaschii, and Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum from the archaea; rat, mouse, human, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans, Arabidopsis thaliana, and wheat from the eukaryota; and the PIMT from T. maritima at the bottom, immediately above its secondary structure elements. Invariant residues are displayed in inverse type, while highly conserved to less conserved residues are shaded from dark gray to lighter gray. Conserved sequence motifs are boxed above the sequences. Where only one or two residues are found in 10 or more out of the 15 aligned sequences, those residue(s) are noted. The PIMT version of previously identified AdoMet-MTase consensus sequences [33] form the MTase-in-PIMT motifs, indicated by “MTase/PIMT”. Conserved sequences unique to PIMT are indicated by “PIMT.” This figure was prepared with the program ALSCRIPT [62] Structure 2000 8, 1189-1201DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00522-0)

Figure 5 Active Site Structure and a Model for Isoaspartyl Peptide Binding (a) Stereo diagram of AdoHcy and surrounding surface residues. Only AdoHcy and the residues on either side are shown. Other residues, including the overlying Val-45, have been removed for clarity. The protein is shown as a ball and stick model, while the bonds of AdoHcy are drawn as gray sticks. The Sδ atom of AdoHcy is depicted as a white sphere. (b) Electrostatic surface potential of T. maritima PIMT with modeled AdoMet. Electrostatic surface potential was calculated and displayed with the program GRASP [52]. Fully saturated blue and red correspond to potentials of +10 kBT/q and −10 kBT/q. The locations of the East and West Rims and the Cϵ atom of AdoMet are indicated. The view shown is approximately the same as Figure 2. (c) Closeup of (b) centered around the active site, the dashed box in (b). The surface location of residues near the the active site are noted. (d) Stereo diagram of the proposed model for isoaspartyl peptide binding (see text). The α-carboxyl group of the isoAsp is shown entering the deep well containing the modeled methyl group donor. The location of the remaining atoms of the isoaspartyl residue and the rest of a bound isoAsp peptide can not be predicted with confidence. Panels (a) and (d) were drawn with the program MOLSCRIPT [59] Structure 2000 8, 1189-1201DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00522-0)