HYDROMORPHOLGY WORKSHOP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS development. Danube Commission+ISRBC meeting Sava GIS Sava GIS establishment –Performed in accordance with the Sava GIS Strategy EU WFD INSPIRE Directive.
Advertisements

Environmental flows in Europe Mike Acreman. Green and pleasant land? Thames basin 10,000 km mm rainfall 15 million people significant water stress.
1 Influence of Main River Basin District Plans on Environment Czech University of Life Sciences Faculty of Environmental Sciences Miroslav Martis,Vladimir.
Hydropower and the Water Environment Peter Gammeltoft European Commission DG Environment, D.1 Water 2nd Workshop on Water Management, WFD & Hydropower.
Streams & Springs Breakout Session Trans-boundary collaboration Meeting July 9, 2014.
Why is hydromorphology important Functioning of physical processes spontaneously promotes ecosystem diversity and functioning.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 7 - How to do Integrated Assessment Stage D: Issuing policy recommendations.
Hydropeaking and minimum flow : the French approach. P. Baran CIS ECOSTAT - HYDROMORPHOLGY WORKSHOP 12th and 13th June Brussels Pôle Ecohydraulique.
HMWB-Workshop „Heavily Modified Water Bodies: Information Exchange on Designation, Assessment of Ecological Potential, Objective Setting and Measures”
Water Director Meeting 30th November 2006, Inari / SF WFD and Hydromorphology Technical report on “Good practice in managing the ecological impacts of.
ECOSTAT workshop “Hydromorphology and WFD classification Oslo, Norway, October 2015 (back-to-back with ECOSTAT) Organised in close collaboration.
T.R. MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS
Rebecca Tharme Riverfutures Limited – UK
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.
Environmental Objectives- Article 4.7
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Compiled by core group ECOSTAT workshop, Paris
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: an introduction
BRIDGE WP5 Socio-Economic Assessment of Groundwater Threshold Values
Daughter Groundwater Directive
CIS guidance document on E-Flows
Agenda item 6e) Update on progress elaboration of Article 4.7 Guidance
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
GEP vs. GES.
CIS General progress report WD meeting 16 June 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
WFD and Hydromorphology - 4/5 June 2007, Berlin, Germany -
Informal meeting of EU Water Directors
WG ESA meeting 9th of March 2015
CIS workshop : assessment of the ecological status.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
EC GUIDANCE ON IWT AND NATURA 2000 CHAPTER 3
Johan Kling, Proposal for improved coordination of hydromorphology within CIS structure proposal by SE, NO, EE, IT Johan Kling,
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
CIS guidance document on Eflows
Hydropower and the WFD: constraint or opportunity?
Natural water Retention Measures
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
WFD and Hydromorphology
EU Water Balances: State of play, value added and follow-up
Working group Ecological Flows
1st Implementation Report of the Water Framework Directive
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Legal issues in WFD implementation WD meeting 16 June 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
Pilot River Basin Water Framework Directive.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Comparison of methodologies for defining Good Ecological Potential
Planning process in river basin management
Environmental and resource costs Lessons learned from ECO2
Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP)
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Update WG Eflows activity and link with EcoStat
Water Framework Directive, Habitats Directive and Inland Waterway Transport Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European Commission.
THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)
Progress on the elaboration of CIS guidance document on E-Flows
HMWB-Workshop „Heavily Modified Water Bodies: Information Exchange on Designation, Assessment of Ecological Potential, Objective Setting and Measures”
E-flow guidance and groundwater
The Blueprint and Council Conclusions:
NGOs expectations for next WFD cycle
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Summary overview of methods used to define GEP in practice by countries represented in the ad-hoc group Dr. Ursula Schmedtje.
Item 4 b) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and CIS WFD
MAES and Accounting support to BD 2020 evaluation
Presentation transcript:

HYDROMORPHOLGY WORKSHOP CIS ECOSTAT HYDROMORPHOLGY WORKSHOP 12th and 13th June 2012 SESSION D: ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS PRESENTATIONS Proposal for an EU conceptual framework for environmental flows Assessing river flows, state of play in Spain Minimum flows and hydropeaking, state of play in France Minimum flows and hydropeaking, state of play in Austria Minimum flows and hydropeaking, state of play in Norway Implementing environmental flows, taking account of the impact on use

REVIEW OF THE STATE OF PLAY. CONCEPT Breakout groups Eflow definition is important for establishing the baseline. Trends should go from fix flows to components, Eflows should be dynamic Floods have to be adequately considered Eflows need to be clearly related to ecosystem quality Eflows paper 2.3.1. The concept and definitions of environmental flows (general definition based in bibliography) 4.2.1.1. Implicit eflow definition for the GES 2.1.2. Why a flow regime? Environmental Flow Components 4.2. Eflows to achieve WFD objectives (GES, GEP, PA, Groundwater)

ASPECTS RELATED TO DEFINITION Breakout groups Eflows should ensure fish migration, incl. downstream Ecosystem services and values should be adequately valuated Sediments is an open issue Eflows paper 4.2.1.1. “…eflows should ensure GES indicators”. Connectivity! 4.3.3. Cost effectiveness of eflows. “Many environmental flow benefits have often been ignored in benefit-cost analyses and planning processes are difficult to quantify precisely” Sediments: we are working this issue for the next version

METHODS Breakout groups Different approaches can be used (hydrological, habitat modeling, holistic). Reliable datasets are a constraint for the selection of the methods Combined use of modeling approaches Use a rationale approach, risk based (and do modeling where necessary) Eflows paper 3.1. Methodologies and fundamentals 3.3. Implementation of methods 3.3.1. The choice of the right assessment method 3.3.2. A phased hierarchical approach in the implementation of methods 3.3.3. A three-level assessment framework

IMPLEMENTING EFLOWS Breakout groups First define eflows and afterwards discuss with users Assessment process is different from implementation process Eflows paper 4.2.2. Eflows in Heavily Modified Water Bodies (HMWB) Environmental flows are useful and necessary in the process of identifying and designating HMWB (based in WFD CIS). “…evaluate possible significant adverse effects on the specified uses”

KNOWLEDGE Breakout groups Knowledge exchange should be promoted and facilitated Economic constraints of current EU budgets to deliver all expected research and improvements