Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Novel Role of Toll-Like Receptor 3 in Hepatitis C-Associated Glomerulonephritis  Markus Wörnle, Holger Schmid, Bernhard Banas, Monika Merkle, Anna Henger,
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Osteopontin expression in acute renal allograft rejection
Distinctive proliferative phase differences in gene expression in human myometrium and leiomyomata  Hongbo Wang, MD, Mamatha Mahadevappa, PhD, Karen Yamamoto,
Plasmin is not protective in experimental renal interstitial fibrosis1
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Athena Kalyvas, Samuel David  Neuron 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Gene expression profiling of multiple leiomyomata uteri and matched normal tissue from a single patient  Irina K. Dimitrova, M.D., Jennifer K. Richer,
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Array-CGH Reveals Recurrent Genomic Changes in Merkel Cell Carcinoma Including Amplification of L-Myc  Kelly G. Paulson, Bianca D. Lemos, Bin Feng, Natalia.
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Michael Eikmans, Hans J. Baelde, Emile De Heer, Jan A. Bruijn 
Heather N. Reich, Carol Landolt-Marticorena, Paul C
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Gene expression profiling from endomyocardial biopsy tissue allows distinction between subentities of dilated cardiomyopathy  Volker Ruppert, MD, Thomas.
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Improvement of extraction and processing of RNA from renal biopsies
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Molecular Classification of Renal Tumors by Gene Expression Profiling
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 81, Issue 12, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Gene Array Expression Profiling in Acne Lesions Reveals Marked Upregulation of Genes Involved in Inflammation and Matrix Remodeling  Nishit R. Trivedi,
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
miR-210 Is a Prognostic Marker in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Edmund G. Lowrie  Kidney International 
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 71, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 73, Issue 12, Pages (June 2008)
Renal L-type fatty acid-binding protein mediates the bezafibrate reduction of cisplatin- induced acute kidney injury  K. Negishi, E. Noiri, R. Maeda, D.
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 78, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Molecular Signatures in Skin Associated with Clinical Improvement during Mycophenolate Treatment in Systemic Sclerosis  Monique Hinchcliff, Chiang-Ching.
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Gene Expression Profiles of Cutaneous B Cell Lymphoma
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
A.K.I. Kuroki, Masayuki Iyoda, Takanori Shibata, Tetsuzo Sugisaki 
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Gene expression profile in diabetic KK/Ta mice
Overview of the cellular and molecular basis of kidney fibrosis
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Volume 69, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 54, Pages S159-S161 (September 1998)
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Plasmin is not protective in experimental renal interstitial fibrosis1
Presentation transcript:

Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 904-917 (March 2004) Gene expression fingerprints in human tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis as prognostic markers of disease progression1  Anna Henger, Matthias Kretzler, Peter Doran, Mahnaz Bonrouhi, Holger Schmid, Eva Kiss, Clemens D. Cohen, Stephen Madden, Stefan Porubsky, Elisabeth F. Gröne, Detlef Schlöndorff, Peter J. Nelson, Hermann-Josef Gröne  Kidney International  Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 904-917 (March 2004) DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00499.x Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Immunohistology of control (A, D) and hydronephrotic kidneys (B, E, C, F). Monocytes/macrophages were rarely demonstrated by CD68 in control kidney (A). In peritubular capillaries and in hydronephrotic kidney with extensive fibrosis (C), but showed a strong signal in hydronephrotic kidneys with an inflammatory infiltrate (B). Lymphocytes with the CD45RO antigen were seldom seen in control kidney (D), often documented in hydronephrotic kidney with pronounced inflammatory infiltrate (E), and rarely seen in hydronephrotic kidney with extensive fibrosis (F). Alkaline phosphatase antialkaline phosphatase (APAAP) reaction on formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Kidney International 2004 65, 904-917DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00499.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Morphometric study, semiquantitative immunohistochemical data defined the degree of tubulointerstitial inflammation, fibrosis, and tubular atrophy. The quantitative analysis allowed the incorporation of these data into a cluster dendrogram. The dendrogram of the x-axis reflects the relationship among the samples by separating three groups of samples: (I) Con, (II) HN group with high inflammation and low fibrosis (Inflam), and (III) HN group with low inflammation and high fibrosis score (Fibrosis). Con, control; HN, hydronephrosis; inflam, inflammation. Kidney International 2004 65, 904-917DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00499.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Cluster analysis of 375 genes. Cluster analysis was performed on log-transformed values of the fold ratios with gene CLUSTER and visualized in TREEVIEW. The samples are represented in the columns and the genes in the rows. The name of each gene is shown at the right side of each row. Genes that were present at higher levels in the examined group (increased) are shown in progressively brighter shades of red, depending on the fold difference, and genes that were expressed at lower levels (decreased) are shown in progressively brighter shades of green. Genes shown in black were not different between the groups being compared. Genes shown in gray were not expressed. The cluster dendrogram of the y-axis shows predictive genes extracted from the whole gene set. Genes are grouped according the similarity of their expression profile. The degree of similarity and relationship among genes (and samples) are represented by the length of the branches (the shorter, the higher the similarity). The color-coded matrix and the dendrogram of the x-axis reflects the relationship among the samples by separating the identical three groups as known from clustering immunohistologic data. Grouping of genes with similar expression is reflected by the tree on the left side. A cluster containing 31 genes showing at least 3-fold difference in expression relative to control samples was determined to provide the greatest expression level of separation of control, hydronephrosis with dominant inflammation, and hydronephrosis with dominant fibrosis. Kidney International 2004 65, 904-917DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00499.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Confirmation of the array expression pattern of nine genes by real time RT-PCR normalized to 18S rRNA and cyclophilin A mRNA. The left panel shows the array expression levels of each examined gene, and, in comparison, the right panel shows the expression ratios to 18S rRNA and cyclophilin A of the nine confirmed gene. Y-axis shows the average of expression values of all samples analyzed in one group. Each group includes different numbers of samples as already mentioned above. Different ratios are due to the different expression levels of the analyzed genes. RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Kidney International 2004 65, 904-917DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00499.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Real time RT-PCR quantification of mRNA expression of the nine candidate genes in a series of renal biopsies grouped by characterization of level of inflammation (I) versus fibrosis (F) or mixed morphology (I/F). The graphs show expression ratios of each gene to 18S rRNA (A) and cyclophilin A (B) in the renal biopsies. RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Kidney International 2004 65, 904-917DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00499.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Gene expression profiles in correlation to clinical outcome of available follow-up data. Real time RT-PCR expression data of the nine genes analyzed were compared between patients requiring renal replacement therapy and chronic stable or remittent course. All analyzed genes revealed a higher mean expression (marked as crossbars) level in the poor renal outcome group. For IL-8, MMP-9, MMP-7, urokinase R, and integrin-β4, differences between both patient groups were statistically significant (depicted as asterisks, P = 0.0036, P = 0.0195, P = 0.0006, P = 0.0274, P = 0.000059, respectively). The numbers next to the individual data points identify the specific patient samples defined in Table 2 (A). Dendrogram showing clear separation of patient groups based on gene expression (B). RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Kidney International 2004 65, 904-917DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00499.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions