Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Advertisements

Anti-idiotype RNAs that mimic the leucine-rich nuclear export signal and specifically bind to CRM1/exportin 1  Jörg Hamm, Maarten Fornerod  Chemistry.
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Drosophila Katanin-60 Depolymerizes and Severs at Microtubule Defects
The Protein Import Motor of Mitochondria
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40  John R Glover, Susan Lindquist  Cell 
Andreas Martin, Tania A. Baker, Robert T. Sauer  Molecular Cell 
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Matthew D. Petroski, Raymond J. Deshaies  Molecular Cell 
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
Kåre L. Nielsen, Nicholas J. Cowan  Molecular Cell 
ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
Erik Procko, Ian Ferrin-O'Connell, Sze-Ling Ng, Rachelle Gaudet 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Energetics of Protein Transport across Biological Membranes
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Sofia Yu. Khaitlina, Hanna Strzelecka-Gołaszewska  Biophysical Journal 
ClpS, a Substrate Modulator of the ClpAP Machine
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
Interaction of Cortactin and N-WASp with Arp2/3 Complex
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay Involves the Selective Targeting of PMR1 to Polyribosome-Bound Substrate mRNA  Feng Yang, Daniel R Schoenberg  Molecular.
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Ubiquitinated Proteins Activate the Proteasome by Binding to Usp14/Ubp6, which Causes 20S Gate Opening  Andreas Peth, Henrike C. Besche, Alfred L. Goldberg 
Linkage between ATP Consumption and Mechanical Unfolding during the Protein Processing Reactions of an AAA+ Degradation Machine  Jon A. Kenniston, Tania.
Calnexin Discriminates between Protein Conformational States and Functions as a Molecular Chaperone In Vitro  Yoshito Ihara, Myrna F Cohen-Doyle, Yoshiro.
Jinki Yeom, Kyle J. Wayne, Eduardo A. Groisman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Mechanism of Substrate Unfolding and Translocation by the Regulatory Particle of the Proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii  Fan Zhang, Zhuoru.
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Diverse Pore Loops of the AAA+ ClpX Machine Mediate Unassisted and Adaptor- Dependent Recognition of ssrA-Tagged Substrates  Andreas Martin, Tania A. Baker,
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
UA62784 Is a Cytotoxic Inhibitor of Microtubules, not CENP-E
Amanda Solem, Nora Zingler, Anna Marie Pyle  Molecular Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
David M Berman, Thomas M Wilkie, Alfred G Gilman  Cell 
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
A Stable Prefusion Intermediate of the Alphavirus Fusion Protein Reveals Critical Features of Class II Membrane Fusion  Claudia Sánchez-San Martín, Hernando.
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Evaluation of a Diffusion-Driven Mechanism for Substrate Ubiquitination by the SCF- Cdc34 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex  Matthew D. Petroski, Gary Kleiger,
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
RhoA GTPase Regulates B Cell Receptor Signaling
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Mammalian 26S Proteasomes Remain Intact during Protein Degradation
Functional Coupling of Capping and Transcription of mRNA
Probing the Dynamics of Clot-Bound Thrombin at Venous Shear Rates
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Characterization of a Specificity Factor for an AAA+ ATPase
Volume 13, Issue 15, Pages (August 2003)
A RecA Filament Capping Mechanism for RecX Protein
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 69-78 (January 2003) ATP Hydrolysis by the Proteasome Regulatory Complex PAN Serves Multiple Functions in Protein Degradation  Nadia Benaroudj, Peter Zwickl, Erika Seemüller, Wolfgang Baumeister, Alfred L Goldberg  Molecular Cell  Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 69-78 (January 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00775-X

Figure 1 Loosely Folded Substrates, Globular Substrates, and Peptides Activate ATP Hydrolysis by PAN to the Same Extent and Irrespective of the Presence of 20S Proteasomes (A) ATPase activity of PAN in the presence of loosely folded and globular substrates. 2.8 nM of PAN complex were incubated with 4 μM of casein, GFP, or GFPssrA as indicated at 45°C, and ATP hydrolysis was measured in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, and 10 mM MgCl2. Values are means plus standard deviations of three independent experiments. (B) Effect of 20S proteasomes on the basal and substrate-activated ATPase activity of PAN. 2.8 nM of PAN complex were incubated as in (A) in the presence of 14 nM of 20S proteasomes. (C) SsrA peptide inhibits unfolding of GFPssrA by PAN. The time course of fluorescence change of 500 nM of GFPssrA alone (•) or in the presence of 250 nM of PAN complex (▴) or 250 nM of PAN complex and 100 μM of ssrA peptide (○) was followed at 45°C in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 2 mM ATP, and 10 mM MgCl2. The initial decrease in GFPssrA fluorescence reflects the effects of 45°C on GFP fluorescence and does not indicate unfolding, which occurred only after addition of PAN and ATP. (D) SsrA peptide inhibits casein degradation by the PAN-20S complex. Degradation of 500 nM 14C-casein was followed with 2.1 nM of 20S proteasomes (open bars) or 2.1 nm 20S proteasomes and 9.3 nM of PAN complex (filled bars) in the presence of 550 μM of ssrA peptide as indicated at 45°C in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, and 10 mM MgCl2. Values are means plus standard deviations of three independent experiments. (E) SsrA peptide activates PAN's ATPase activity. ATP hydrolysis by PAN was measured without or with 4 μM of ssrA peptides as described in (A). Values are means plus standard deviations of three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 69-78DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00775-X)

Figure 2 PAN Stimulates the Degradation of Globular and Unfolded Proteins by 20S Proteasomes The degradation of 1 μM of 14C-GFPssrA, acid-denatured 14C-GFPssrA, or 14C-casein was followed with 2.1 nM of 20S proteasomes alone (open bars), with 9.3 nM of PAN complex added (striped bars), or with 9.3 nM of PAN complex and 1 mM ATP added (filled bars) at 45°C in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2. Values are means plus standard deviations of three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 69-78DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00775-X)

Figure 3 ATP Consumption by PAN during Degradation of Globular and Unfolded Proteins by 20S Proteasomes 1 μM of 14C-casein (upper panel), 14C-GFPssrA (middle panel), or acid-denatured 14C-GFPssrA (lower panel) were incubated with different concentrations of PAN (0, 1.54, 3.08, 4.62, 6.16, and 7.7 nM) and of 20S proteasomes (0, 7.14, 14,28, 21.42, 28.56, and 35.7 nM) at 45°C in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, and 10 mM MgCl2 in a 100 μl vol reaction. 50 μl were used to measure ATP hydrolysis, and 50 μl were used to measure protein degradation as described in Experimental Procedures. The rates of ATP hydrolysis were plotted against those of protein degradation. The data were fitted to a linear function, and the slope (shown in the lower right corner of each panel) was used to determined the number of moles of ATP hydrolyzed during degradation of one mole of protein. Values are means plus or minus standard deviations of three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 69-78DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00775-X)

Figure 4 Deletion of Amino-Terminal Residues of 20S α Subunits Opens the Axial Channel of α Rings Electron microscopy top views of the α subunits of wild-type (A) and Δα(2-12) 20S proteasomes (B) were performed as described in Experimental Procedures. (C) represents the difference mapping of the averaged pictures. The diameter of both complexes is approximately 11 nm. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 69-78DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00775-X)

Figure 5 Deletion of Amino-Terminal Residues of 20S α Subunits Increases Rate of Degradation of Unfolded Proteins and Eliminates Stimulation by PAN (A) Wild-type and Δα(2-12) 20S proteasomes degrade a tetrapeptide at similar rates. The degradation of 100 μM of Suc-LLVY-amc was carried out as described in Experimental Procedures with 420 nM of wild-type (solid line) or Δα(2-12) 20S (dashed line) at 45°C in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2. (B) Degradation of GFPssrA, acid-denatured GFPssrA, and casein by Δα(2-12) 20S. Degradation of 1 μM of 14C-radiolabeled protein was followed as in Figure 2. Values are means plus standard deviations of three independent experiments. (C) PAN promotes degradation of GFPssrA by the Δα(2-12) 20S. The time course of fluorescence change of 250 nM of GFPssrA was followed at 45°C in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, and 10 mM MgCl2 in the presence of 20 nM of Δα(2-12)20S and 2 mM of ATP (•); or of 20 nM of Δα(2-12)20S, 10 nM of PAN complex, and 2 mM of AMPPNP (○); or of 20 nM of Δα(2-12)20S, 10 nM of PAN complex, and 2 mM of ATP (▴). Molecular Cell 2003 11, 69-78DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00775-X)

Figure 6 After Unfolding of GFPssrA by PAN, Hydrolysis of ATP by PAN Is Still Essential for Its Degradation by the Δα(2-12)20S Proteasome Variant (A) The time course of fluorescence change of 250 nM of GFPssrA was followed in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, and 10 mM MgCl2 at 45°C in the presence of 50 nM of PAN (▵, •, ▴). After 15 min of incubation to allow unfolding of GFPssrA, 0 nM (▵) or 20 nM of Δα(2-12)20S was added to the samples together with 2 mM of ATPγS (•) or the equivalent volume of buffer (▵, ▴). If Δα(2-12)20S were present together with PAN and ATP from the onset (○), only buffer was added. (B) GFPssrA was incubated as in (A), and at the indicated times, aliquots were withdrawn, loaded on a 12% SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by Western blot using an anti-histidine antibody. The antibody also recognizes the β subunit of 20S proteasomes which carries a (His)6 tag. (C) GFPssrA amount on (B) was quantified and relative amounts were determined using the 0 time point as 100%. Relative amounts of GFPssrA in lanes 1–3 (○), 4–6 (▵), 7–9 (▴), and 10–12 (•) are plotted as indicated. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 69-78DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00775-X)

Figure 7 Model for the Energy-Dependent Steps of PAN and Proteasomes-Mediated Protein Degradation Cut side views of 20S particles are schematized with the active sites represented as blue dots in the internal chamber. PAN is schematized as a hexameric ring. The circle and pentagonal shape of the subunits represent the substrate-free and substrate-bound forms of PAN, respectively. The gate which precludes entry of protein into 20S particles is represented in red. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 69-78DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00775-X)