Session 15: Activity 2 Lessons learned

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Question 5 : Are they well led? Supporting staff Temporary Staffing MAST Staff Appraisals.
Advertisements

Risk Assessment – An Essential Standard
London and South East Burns Services Review Patient Stakeholder Event 15 th January 2011 The Olympic Lodge Hotel, Aylesbury.
After Action Reviews (AAR) Key Points. An After Action Review (AAR)…  Is a dynamic and honest discussion soon after an event  Requires active participation.
HR in Health Conference 2016 Performance Achievement People Strategy 2015 – 2018 Leaders in People Services Connecting with our people –through Quality.
Unit 10 Engage in personal development in health, social care or children’s and young people’s settings.
Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.
Project Management 6e..
Requirements Determination
Disaster and Emergency Planning
Resource 1. Involving and engaging the right stakeholders.
Unit 1: Science, Technology and Engineering
Making the most of booster classes October 2002
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION M&E.
Implementing the NHS KSF Action Planning and Surgery Session
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
Facilitator notes: Epidemiological methods for point prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in acute care hospitals.
Module B- Taking the Lead
Performance Achievement a quick reference guide to
Reporting personal data breaches to the ICO
Intervention Strategies for borderline students
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Planning a Learning Unit
Patient Safety Guidance- development, implementation and compliance
Effective Support for Children & Families in Essex
Session 1: Welcome to the programme
Designing a Research Package
Team Leader Training Angry Captains
Scientific Inquiry Standard B – 1.7.
Lesson study What is it and why do it?.
Point prevalence survey epidemiology
Facilitator notes: Epidemiological methods for point prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in acute care hospitals.
After Action Review (AAR)
Multi-agency Safeguarding Adults Policy and Procedure
Safety Management System Implementation
Facilitator notes: Course on the development, implementation and evaluation of prudent antibiotic use campaigns Welcome! ECDC, 2013.
Session 7: Problems with Hotels
Facilitator notes: Session 2: Clinical and epidemiological aspects of Legionnaires’ disease ECDC, 2011 Major revision: 2018.
Session 7: Problems with Ships
Session 6: Principles of Outbreak Investigation
European Legionnaires’ disease Surveillance Network (ELDSNet)
Session 1: Welcome to the programme
AS Applied Business Lesson 1.
Session 4, Activity 2: Slides for interactive work
Session 15: Activity 1: Outbreak Report
SESSION FOUR Storyboards
PSHE at Key Stages 1 – 2 Guidance on Assessment, Recording and Reporting If it is not assessment for learning – why are we doing it? Assessment must.
Improvement 101 Learning Series
Privacy and Dignity 7 Standard.
Scenario 6: Maintaining Classroom Standards
Conduct and Conclude an Exercise
Patient Safety Guidance- development, implementation and compliance
Patient Participation
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Behaviour Scenarios A specially commissioned set of resources for tutors, school mentors and trainee teachers Scenario 8: Setting Learning Intentions and.
Citizen-Led Multi-agency Safeguarding Adults Policy and Procedures
Health and Safety Induction for Managers
Where We Are Now 14–2. Where We Are Now 14–2 Major Tasks of Project Closure Evaluate if the project delivered the expected benefits to all stakeholders.
Facilitator notes: Legionnaires’ disease: Risk assessment, outbreak investigation and control Session 5, Activity 2: Analysis and Interpretation of Laboratory.
Conclusion 1 Two cases were epidemiologically linked to the hospital.
Session 7: Problems with Spa Pools
OTLA Report Writing Training
Project Management 6e..
Facilitator notes: Legionnaires’ disease: Risk assessment, outbreak investigation and control Session 12: Legionnaires disease – The importance of communication.
Project Management 6e..
Session 8: Risk Assessments and Water Systems
Session 13/14: Outbreak Exercise
What happened next… Outbreak investigation team drawn up.
Session 11: Feedback from site visit
Presentation transcript:

Session 15: Activity 2 Lessons learned Facilitator notes: Legionnaires’ disease: Risk assessment, outbreak investigation and control Session 15: Activity 2 Lessons learned ECDC, 2012

Why review and identify the lessons learned? An incident is an opportunity for: Policies, guidance and plans to be tested in real time To learn what happened To understand why an incident happened the way it did What worked and what didn’t work to be identified In order to maximise the learning then the knowledge that is extracted and recorded should be carried out in a formal manner and shared Reviews help retain learning from what happened and understand why it happened, look at what went well, what needs improvement and what needs to change

Running a review Involve all the key players and should be conducted as soon as possible after the incident. The review should enable the players involved to go through what happened in the incident It is important to focus on improvement and to ensure that any mistakes or areas of poor practice that are identified can be turned into learning opportunities It is essential that there is trust and openness and that it is a learning experience rather than an attempt to lay blame

Running a review (continued) An independent facilitator may be useful to help draw out answers, insights and issues, and to ensure that everyone contributes. It should be structured as an informal session to try to achieve agreement on What was supposed to happen? What actually happened? Why were there differences? What did we learn? What are the lessons for next time?

Running a review (continued) More probing questions might include: What were we trying to do? What were the objectives and deliverables? What was actually achieved? What went well? What could have gone better? Why did it happen the way it did? What did we do? What would we do differently next time? How does this affect the next stage? What needs to be disseminated to whom and how?

Running a review (continued) Throughout the review process comments and feedback should be invited. This will help the players learn as much as possible before the team disbands. Decide how the new knowledge is going to be incorporated into a future response The review outcomes are normally captured during the session, on flip chart paper or electronically, depending on how the information will be used. To inform future work, ensure that everything has been properly documented and stored or published before formally closing a project.

Facilitator notes: Acknowledgements The creation of this training material was commissioned in 2010 by ECDC to Health Protection Agency (UK) and the University of Chester (UK) with the direct involvement of Louise Brown, Janice Gidman, Emma Gilgunn-Jones, Ian Hall (on behalf of the ECDC Legionnaires Disease Outbreak Toolbox Development Group), Tim Harrison, Rob Johnston, Carol Joseph, Sandra Lai, John Lee, Falguni Naik, Nick Phin, Michelle Rivett, and Susanne Surman-Lee. The revision and update of this training material was commissioned in 2017 by ECDC to Transmissible (NL) with the direct involvement of Arnold Bosman and Kassiani Mellou.