Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 16, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
HURP Is a Ran-Importin β-Regulated Protein that Stabilizes Kinetochore Microtubules in the Vicinity of Chromosomes  Herman H.W. Silljé, Susanna Nagel,
CENP-C Is a Structural Platform for Kinetochore Assembly
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1  Yinghui Mao, Ariane Abrieu, Don W. Cleveland 
Aurora B Defines Its Own Chromosomal Targeting by Opposing the Recruitment of the Phosphatase Scaffold Repo-Man  Junbin Qian, Monique Beullens, Bart Lesage,
Jakub K. Famulski, Gordon K. Chan  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Human Blinkin/AF15q14 Is Required for Chromosome Alignment and the Mitotic Checkpoint through Direct Interaction with Bub1 and BubR1  Tomomi Kiyomitsu,
Maki Murata-Hori, Yu-li Wang  Current Biology 
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e4 (September 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Cancer Cells Display Profound Intra- and Interline Variation following Prolonged Exposure to Antimitotic Drugs  Karen E. Gascoigne, Stephen S. Taylor 
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
CENP-C Is a Structural Platform for Kinetochore Assembly
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
The Timing of Midzone Stabilization during Cytokinesis Depends on Myosin II Activity and an Interaction between INCENP and Actin  Jennifer Landino, Ryoma.
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2005)
Kinetochore Attachments Require an Interaction between Unstructured Tails on Microtubules and Ndc80Hec1  Stephanie A. Miller, Michael L. Johnson, P. Todd.
Functional Comparison of H1 Histones in Xenopus Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulation by Cdk1 and RanGTP  Benjamin S. Freedman, Rebecca Heald  Current Biology 
The Role of NEDD1 Phosphorylation by Aurora A in Chromosomal Microtubule Nucleation and Spindle Function  Roser Pinyol, Jacopo Scrofani, Isabelle Vernos 
Yumi Uetake, Greenfield Sluder  Current Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Roshan L. Shrestha, Viji M. Draviam  Current Biology 
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Distinct Roles of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex in the Detection of and Response to Errors in Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment  Julian Haase, Mary.
Chk1 Is Required for Spindle Checkpoint Function
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
CENP-E as an Essential Component of the Mitotic Checkpoint In Vitro
Volume 19, Issue 21, Pages (November 2009)
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 17, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Polo-like Kinase 1 Triggers the Initiation of Cytokinesis in Human Cells by Promoting Recruitment of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the Central Spindle  Mark Petronczki,
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
LGN Blocks the Ability of NuMA to Bind and Stabilize Microtubules
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
David Vanneste, Masatoshi Takagi, Naoko Imamoto, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 11, Issue 19, Pages (October 2001)
Dual Detection of Chromosomes and Microtubules by the Chromosomal Passenger Complex Drives Spindle Assembly  Boo Shan Tseng, Lei Tan, Tarun M. Kapoor,
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Swapna Kollu, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Cenp-F Links Kinetochores to Ndel1/Nde1/Lis1/Dynein Microtubule Motor Complexes  Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology  Volume 17, Issue 13, Pages 1173-1179 (July 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.077 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cenp-F Targets Ndel1 to Kinetochores (A) Anti-GFP immunoblots showing that in an in vitro binding assay, GST-tagged full-length Ndel1 interacts with GFP-tagged Cenp-F fragment d8 (lane 2). The controls show that GFP-Cenp-F (d8) does not bind GST fusions encoding the N terminus of Ndel1 (lane 4) or a fragment of BubR1 (lane 6). In addition, GST-Ndel1 does not bind GFP (lane 1). The input lanes and coomassie-stained gel show that equivalent amounts of GFP proteins and GST-fusions were added to the binding reactions. (B) Immunoblots of whole-cell extracts showing that the novel Ndel1 antibody, SNN.1, recognizes ectopically expressed GFP-tagged Ndel1 (lanes 1–4) plus a band at ∼38 kDa—the expected size of Ndel1—that diminishes after transfection of siRNAs designed to target Ndel1 (lane 9). The dilution series of the control sample (lanes 5–8) indicates that in this population, Ndel1 is repressed to between 10% and 30%; BubR1 was used as a loading control. (C) Immunofluorescence images of DLD-1 cells stained to detect Ndel1 (red), microtubules (green), and DNA (blue). Endogenous Ndel1 is readily detectable at KTs in prometaphase and metaphase (panels i and ii) but not during anaphase (panel iii). Enlargement shows Ndel1 at the end of a K fiber. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (D) Immunofluorescence images of HeLa cells after transfection of siRNA duplexes then stained to detect Ndel1 (red), Bub1 (green), Cenp-F, and DNA. Ndel1 colocalizes with Bub1 at KTs in the control cell but not after Cenp-F repression. Scale bar represents 5 μm. Current Biology 2007 17, 1173-1179DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.077) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Ndel1 Is Required for Normal Chromosome Segregation (A) Box-and-whisker plot showing that the timing of an unperturbed mitosis is not significantly different after repression of Ndel1 (mean values ± SEM; 60.3 ± 3.7 [n = 46] in controls; 54.9 ± 5.3 [n = 49] after Ndel1 RNAi; p > 0.05, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test). (B) Images from time-lapse sequences showing that whereas the control cell completes mitosis normally, anaphase bridges are apparent after Ndel1 RNAi. (C) Immunofluorescence images showing one control and two Ndel1-deficient cells. 24 hr after siRNA transfections, cells were permeabilized with conditions that selectively stabilize K fibers and then were stained to detect tubulin (green), Bub1 (red), and the DNA (blue). The enlargements show malorientations after Ndel1 RNAi. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (D) Box-and-whisker plots showing the time spent in mitosis after RNAi-mediated repression of Ndel1 and BubR1 in the presence or absence of monastrol, showing that Ndel1-deficient cells mount a robust spindle checkpoint response. (E) Bar graph showing that normalized Mad2 pixel intensities at nocodazole-treated kinetochores are unaffected after repression of Ndel1 and Nde1. Values represent mean ± SEM. Current Biology 2007 17, 1173-1179DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.077) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Nde1 Is Required for Chromosome Alignment (A) Immunofluorescence images of HeLa cells stained to detect Nde1 (red), Bub1 (green), Cenp-F, and DNA. Nde1 colocalizes with Bub1 in the control cell but not after Cenp-F repression. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (B) Immunoblot showing specific repression of Ndel1 and Nde1 after transfection of Ndel1 and Nde1 siRNAs, respectively. (C) Box-and-whisker plot showing that Nde1 RNAi significantly extends the time in mitosis (mean values ± SEM; 72 ± 4 [n = 112] in controls; 69 ± 4 [n = 151] after Ndel1 RNAi; 170 ± 17 [n = 68] after Nde1 RNAi; p < 0.0001, two-tailed Mann-Whitney test). (D) Images from time-lapse sequences after transfection of siRNA duplexes against Nde1 showing chromosome alignment failure and prolonged mitosis. (E) Anti-GFP immunoblots showing that GST-tagged full-length Nde1 interacts with GFP-tagged Cenp-F fragment d8 in vitro (lane 2). Current Biology 2007 17, 1173-1179DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.077) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Nde1 but Not Ndel1 Targets Dynein to Kinetochores (A and B) Immunofluorescence images of HeLa cells after transfection of siRNA duplexes to repress Ndel1 (A) and Nde1 (B), stained to detect DIC (red), Cenp-F (green), Ndel1 or Nde1, and DNA, showing that Dynein-positive kinetochores are less apparent after Nde1 RNAi. Scale bar represents 5 μm. (C) Bar graph showing that normalized Mad2 pixel intensities at metaphase kinetochores in MG132-treated cells are elevated after repression of Nde1. Values represent mean ± SEM. (D) Schematic summarizing dependency relationships described here. See text for details. Current Biology 2007 17, 1173-1179DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.077) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions