Evolution and Functional Diversity of Jellyfish Opsins

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Mesoderm-Forming Gene brachyury Regulates Ectoderm-Endoderm Demarcation in the Coral Acropora digitifera  Yuuri Yasuoka, Chuya Shinzato, Noriyuki.
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Expression of Frizzled Genes in Developing and Postnatal Hair Follicles  Seshamma T. Reddy, Thomas Andl, Min-Min Lu, Edward E. Morrisey, Sarah E. Millar,
Laminopathies: Too Much SUN Is a Bad Thing
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Genetic Consequences of Programmed Genome Rearrangement
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Global Mapping of Human RNA-RNA Interactions
Meiosis: Organizing Microtubule Organizers
The Evolution of Venom by Co-option of Single-Copy Genes
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
The Origin of Vertebrate Gills
Michael J. Bok, Megan L. Porter, Allen R. Place, Thomas W. Cronin 
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
The evolutionary origin of hedgehog proteins
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2005)
Hydra  Kristine M. Glauber, Catherine E. Dana, Robert E. Steele 
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages e3 (October 2017)
The NK Homeobox Gene Cluster Predates the Origin of Hox Genes
Yvonne Stahl, René H. Wink, Gwyneth C. Ingram, Rüdiger Simon 
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Molecular Analysis of Stem Cells and Their Descendants during Cell Turnover and Regeneration in the Planarian Schmidtea mediterranea  George T. Eisenhoffer,
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1996)
A Novel Family of Candidate Pheromone Receptors in Mammals
Roberta L. Hannibal, Julie C. Baker  Current Biology 
Functional Dissection of sRNA Translational Regulators by Nonhomologous Random Recombination and In Vivo Selection  Jane M. Liu, Joshua A. Bittker, Maria.
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Brain Evolution: Getting Better All the Time?
Volume 17, Issue 21, Pages (November 2007)
John T. Arigo, Daniel E. Eyler, Kristina L. Carroll, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Kimberly M. McDermott, Bob Y. Liu, Thea D. Tlsty, Gregory J. Pazour 
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
Males evolved from the dominant isogametic mating type
Evolution of Eukaryotic DNA Methylation and the Pursuit of Safer Sex
Structural Basis for the Differential Effects of CaBP1 and Calmodulin on CaV1.2 Calcium-Dependent Inactivation  Felix Findeisen, Daniel L. Minor  Structure 
Stephanie C. Weber, Clifford P. Brangwynne  Current Biology 
RNA Sequencing of Stentor Cell Fragments Reveals Transcriptional Changes during Cellular Regeneration  Henning Onsbring, Mahwash Jamy, Thijs J.G. Ettema 
Karmella A. Haynes, Amy A. Caudy, Lynne Collins, Sarah C.R. Elgin 
The Chemokine SDF1a Coordinates Tissue Migration through the Spatially Restricted Activation of Cxcr7 and Cxcr4b  Guillaume Valentin, Petra Haas, Darren.
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Developmental Basis of Phallus Reduction during Bird Evolution
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
A Novel Family of Mammalian Taste Receptors
FOXO transcription factors
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Patterns of Stem Cell Divisions Contribute to Plant Longevity
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development
A Bmp/Admp Regulatory Circuit Controls Maintenance and Regeneration of Dorsal- Ventral Polarity in Planarians  Michael A. Gaviño, Peter W. Reddien  Current.
An Mll-Dependent Hox Program Drives Hematopoietic Progenitor Expansion
Horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of cnidarian stinging cells
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
The Anterior-Posterior Axis Emerges Respecting the Morphology of the Mouse Embryo that Changes and Aligns with the Uterus before Gastrulation  Daniel.
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Annalise M. Nawrocki, Paulyn Cartwright  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages (October 2015)
A Novel Family of Putative Pheromone Receptors in Mammals with a Topographically Organized and Sexually Dimorphic Distribution  Gilles Herrada, Catherine.
Allison L. Blum, Wanhe Li, Mike Cressy, Josh Dubnau  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 18, Pages (September 2008)
Michael S.Y. Lee, Julien Soubrier, Gregory D. Edgecombe 
Presentation transcript:

Evolution and Functional Diversity of Jellyfish Opsins Hiroshi Suga, Volker Schmid, Walter J. Gehring  Current Biology  Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 51-55 (January 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.059 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cladonema radiatum and Podocoryne carnea (A) Medusa of Cladonema radiatum with camera-type eyes located at the base of the tentacles (arrowheads). (B) A schematic drawing of Cladonema eye (modified after [14]). Ciliary photoreceptor cells (c), pigment cells (p), and lens body (l) are highlighted in red, yellow, and blue, respectively. (C) Medusa of Podocoryne carnea, which lacks eyes. The following abbreviations are used: gonads (g), manubrium (m), tentacle (t), and umbrella (u) (bell). (D) Molecular phylogenetic tree of opsin family, including cnidarian sequences. Thirteen nonopsin G protein-coupled receptor sequences were used as an outgroup. Names of the genes are shown for the cnidarian sequences. Not all of the opsin genes found in the Hydra and Nematostella genomes were included; only the representative sequences for each group were included so that the tree could be simplified (see main text). The subtrees consisting of cnidarian sequences are shaded red, and each subfamily of bilaterian opsins is shaded gray. Body parts where the Cladonema opsins are expressed are indicated in bold letters (see main text): manubrium (M); ubiquitous (Ub); eye (E); and tentacle (T). An alternative branch position of the manubrium-specific (M) and the ubiquitously expressed (Ub) opsin group is indicated by a dashed arrow (see main text). The Cladonema-Hydra split and the Podocoryne-Hydra split are indicated by white circles. The detailed tree and accession numbers to the genes are in Figure S2. The following abbreviations are used: Cladonema radiatum (C.r.), Hydra magnipapillata (H.m.), Nematostella vectensis (N.v.), and Podocoryne carnea (P.c.). Scale bars represent 300 μm in (A) and (C) and 20 μm in (B). Current Biology 2008 18, 51-55DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.059) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Expression Patterns of Cladonema and Podocoryne Opsin Genes (A) For real-time PCR analysis, medusae were dissected into four body parts: tentacles (t), tentacle bulbs with eyes (b), manubrium (m), and umbrella (u) (bell). (B–G) The cDNA from each part was analyzed by real-time PCR. The expression level of opsin in each body part relative to the whole body expression (1.0) was calculated and subsequently normalized to that of EF1α. The y axes are arbitrary. The expression of Cladonema opsins were categorized into four patterns (see text), and a typical example from each pattern is shown (B–E) even though all of the cloned genes, except CropG2, which is too closely related to CropG1, were analyzed (data not shown; only the names are shown in parentheses in the graph of their category representative). Expression patterns in male Podocoryne are shown in (F) and (G); female Podocoryne showed similar patterns to those of males (data not shown). Error bars represent standard deviations. (H–K) In situ hybridization with antisense RNA probes of CropB4 (H), CropC (I), CropJ (J), and CropL (K). The original positions of the bells, which had shrunken during the hybridization procedures, are indicated by dashed lines (H, I, and K). Scale bars represent 200 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 51-55DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.059) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Expressions of Eye- and Manubrium-Specific Opsins (A, B, D, and E) Whole-mount (A and D) and paraffin-section (B and E) in situ hybridizations were carried out with CropG1 (A and B) and CropJ (D and E) antisense RNA probes. The sections were counterstained with eosin solution. Note that the natural pigmentation in the eye had completely disappeared during the hybridization procedure. In (E), the position of the lens, which is not present in this section, is indicated by a dashed circle. The following abbreviations are used: endoderm (en), epidermis (ep), lens (l), mesogloea (m), and a region packed with microvillous processes of ciliary membranes of c-PRCs (mv) (see Figure 1B). (C) Expression levels of the eye-specific opsins in medusa buds with eyes are compared with those in younger medusa buds that have not yet developed the eyes. The red line (1.0) indicates the average expression level in younger medusa buds without the eyes. Data are normalized to EF1α. Error bars represent standard deviations. (F and G) In situ hybridization of CropJ to just-detached (F) and full-grown (G) medusae. (H–J) Expression pattern of CropC. Whole-mount (H and I) and paraffin-section (J) in situ hybridizations were carried out on full-grown (H and J) and just-detached (I) medusae, and the manubriums were subsequently excised. The section was counterstained with eosin solution. Note that the gonads (g in [H]) with mature oocytes are not observed in just-detached medusae (I). In (J), the cells expressing CropC are indicated by arrowheads. The following abbreviations are used: epidermis (e), gonad part of manubrium (g), gastral cavity (ga), gastrodermis (gd), gonads (go), immature oocyte (i), mouth (m), nucleus (n), and mature oocyte (o). Scale bars represent 50 μm in (A), (D), (F), (G), and (J), 10 μm in (B) and (E), and 200 μm in (H) and (I). Current Biology 2008 18, 51-55DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.059) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions