Workshop on Pesticide Indicators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Seminar on Developing a Program for the Implementation of the 2008 SNA and Supporting Statistics in Turkey Arap DİRİ 10 September 2013 Ankara.
Advertisements

Innovation data collection: Advice from the Oslo Manual South East Asian Regional Workshop on Science, Technology and Innovation Statistics.
Using Area Frame for Agricultural Censuses and Surveys: The Philippines Experience by: Rosalinda M. Garcia, Bureau of Agricultural Statistics Minerva Eloisa.
Existing EU Regulations concerning pesticide statistics and Latvia experience in pesticide statistics Guna Karlsone, CSB of Latvia.
State Plant Protection Service 26 September 2007 ISTAMBUL 2005 Transition Facility Programme PESTICIDES USE SURVEY IN LITHUANIA Danguolė Krepštulienė,
Fulfilment of requirements of the Regulation No 1185/2009 regarding agricultural and non agricultural use of pesticides in Latvia Guna Karlsone, CSB of.
Chap 20-1 Statistics for Business and Economics, 6e © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 20 Sampling: Additional Topics in Sampling Statistics for Business.
Structure and Basic Methodology of Preparation and Taking of the Russian Agricultural Census 2016 Deputy Head of Rosstat Dr. Konstantin Laykam FEDERAL.
United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2010 World Programme on Population and Housing Censuses: Census Evaluation and Post Enumeration Surveys Bangkok,
Poverty measurement: experience of the Republic of Moldova UNECE, Measuring poverty, 4 May 2015.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Sources of Agricultural Data Section A 1.
Surveys on agricultural distribution and agricultural use of fertilizers in Italy Mario Adua ISTAT- National Institute of Statistics.
Bohumil Musil State Phytosanitary Administration Plant Protection Products Section Postregistration Control Division Brno, Czech Republic May 6, 2010,
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department Agricultural Census Economic.
National Agriculture Sample Survey Timor Leste Experiences Roundtable Meeting on Programme for the 2010 Round of Censuses of Agriculture - Apia, Samoa.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 Overview of experiences in Slovenia and Hungary Riga, July 2007 Transition Facility Statistical Cooperation Programme.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 The project “Pesticide indicators” and the use of PPP’s in the context of the new Regulation on PPPs Riga, July 2007.
Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Co-operation Programme 2005 Lot 2: Pesticide Indicators Survey on Pesticide Use on Wheat Crops.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 Important aspects of data processing and presenting format Vilnius, 5-6 September 2007 Transition Facility Statistical Cooperation.
Istanbul 13-14th September, 2007 Marios A.Adamides Plant Health Inspection Service Dep. Of Agriculture Min. of Agriculture Cyprus Workshop on Pesticide.
Central Statistical Office of Poland State Plant Health and Seed Inspection Service Plant Protection Institute, Sośnicowice Branch 1 The First Workshop.
„Improvement of statistical methods on the use of organic and inorganic fertilisers” GRANT project No Co-ordination meeting, Luxembourg,
Pesticide use survey in Lithuania 2007 PESTICIDES USE SURVEY IN LITHUANIA SURVEY CROP – WINTER WHEAT Danguolė Krepštulienė, Statistics Lithuania Darius.
Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic 1 Pesticide Indicators Pesticide Indicators Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Cooperation Programme.
2nd Joint Workshop on Pesticide Indicators Pesticide Usage Survey on Wheat in Hungary Zsuzsanna Szabó Hungarian Central Statistical Office September.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and Rural Development.
PRIME MINISTRY REPUBLIC OF TURKEY TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agriculture and Environmental Statistics Department Agricultural Statistics Group 1 IMPLEMENTATION.
General features regarding Agricultural Census/ farm structure surveys in EU Presentation in a training workshop September 2011 “Preparing for Agricultural.
How to deal with quality aspects in estimating national results Annalisa Pallotti Short Term Expert Asa 3st Joint Workshop on Pesticides Indicators Valletta.
Community level data Technical session 15 Regional Roundtable on
Current status of the planning of the AC
United Nations Statistics Division
Statistics – Chapter 1 Data Collection
Rudi Seljak, Aleš Krajnc
Population and household census in Tajikistan 2010
Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Co-operation Programme 2005
5. Areas under organic farming
Input Indicators and gross nutrient balances
Linking Population and Housing Censuses with Agricultural Censuses
Introduction on Institutional Setting Istanbul, September 2007
Random sampling Carlo Azzarri IFPRI Datathon APSU, Dhaka
Nonresponse adjustments and calibration: a comparison between two methods to weight the Labour Force Survey Tania Borg Principal Statistician Labour Market.
Expert visit Bratislava, – Part 2
Workshop on Area Sampling Frame Key features of area sampling frame
Use of handheld electronic devices for data collection in GeoStat
State Plant Health and Seed Inspection Service
Recommendations on survey implementation
PESTICIDE USAGE SURVEY IN TURKEY
FINAL REPORT PLAN PILOT PROJECT: Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary
Organic crop production data collection
Concepts and Definitions Used in Area Sampling Frame
The main results of the Pesticides Survey
3rd Joint Workshop on Pesticide Indicators
PHARE and TF Missions: main findings
Pesticide Usage Surveys
United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2020 World Programme on Population and Housing Censuses: International Standards and Contemporary Technologies,
QUALITY MEASURES IN 2013 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS
Session 4 – From pilot to regular surveys: the costs aspects Introduction: cost impact of possible design strategies Malta, January 2008 Transition.
THE SAMPLING APPROACH IN SLOVENIA
2010 POPULATION AND HOUSING CENSUS – MALAYSIA
PROGRAMME FOR THE 2010 ROUND OF CENSUSES OF AGRICULTURE
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION OF PESTICIDE USAGE STATISTICS A summary
5.3 Pesticides data for 2011 and the future
Cost impact of design strategies, the Slovenian example
1st Joint Workshop Pesticides Statistics
DATA COLLECTION WITH INTERNET
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
ICON-Institute Public Sector
A New Methodology for Frame Building and Sample Design for the State Heating Oil and Propane Program (SHOPP) For Joint Statistical Meetings July 29, 2019.
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on Pesticide Indicators Istanbul 13-14th September, 2007 Carlos Camenzuli Mary Rose Debono National Statistics Office - Malta

Summary Overview of Maltese Agriculture Planning and Approach Problems faced during the interviewing stage Progress to date

Overview of Maltese Agriculture Utilised Agricultural Area (FSS 2005) ≈ 10,200 ha 4,600 ha forage areas 1,100 ha fallow land 800 ha potatoes 1,000 ha kitchen gardens 700 ha vineyards 450 ha orchards 1,600 ha horticulture Approx 12,500 holdings

Overview of Maltese Agriculture Average holding size is 0.85 ha 9,800 holdings (80%) have an area less than 1.0 ha Maltese agriculture is characterised by small scattered parcels An agricultural holding may have various parcels in different locations

Administrative Sources PPP information No local production - All importation is recorded in ‘Intrastat” Total volume of PPP is known – only 6 importers. 2 major reasons for the survey are that ppp’s used for agriculture may not be determined from import statistics and you can not determine which crops are the PPP’s are used on SCOPE OF SURVEY - to determine on which crops PPP’s are being used and to estimate the total active substances used in agriculture

Planning and approach Sampling Method UAA < 0.2 ha not included – approx 4,000 holdings excluded with a combined area of approx 250 ha Not all crops surveyed but crops surveyed according to their physical area. It is impossible to survey all crops in horticulture Sample size of approx 400 holdings out of 8,600 i.e. 4.7% of population

Planning and approach Sampling Method Target population allocated according to typology and size class of UAA Random sampling based on the optimum allocation method The greater the variance within a stratum the more holdings were extracted from that stratum

Planning and approach Sampling Method Sampling with replacement – holdings refusing to take part in the survey where possible, have been replaced Sample split into 6 strata Census on largest stratum

Planning and approach Interviewers & Briefing Technical officers from the ministry of Agriculture have been used - 9 from Malta 2 from Gozo All officers have to observe the confidentiality stipulated by Statistical legislation Reference to IACS data and LPIS maps Interviewers provided with a list of regulated PPP’s as per legal notice and an instruction manual on how to collect the data

Planning and approach Questionnaires Two questionnaires were used in the PPP survey of 2007 The first questionnaire relates to the land area of the holding. This is a summary questionnaire which obtains information on the land use of the holding The second questionnaire relates to the areas that were actually treated. Those crops identified as treated in the summary questionnaire will be asked further questions on the PPP treatment of those crops in those parcels

Planning and approach Summary questionnaire Information collected in the summary questionnaire is as follows: Parcel number Area under parcel Pre-planting treatment Cycle number Crop Code Area under crop Irrigated Treated Sown date Harvest date

Planning and approach Summary questionnaire From this questionnaire we may estimate the total land area that has been treated in comparison to the total land area From this questionnaire we may identify the areas that received PPP treatment Estimation of treated areas of an individual crop to the total area of that crop

Planning and approach Treated areas Information collected in the treated areas questionnaire is as follows: Treatment round Area under crop Area treated Application date Product name Amount applied Method of application

Planning and approach Treated areas Through the product name we will be able to identify the % of active ingredient and the active substance We may also identify the volume and type of active substance used per crop We may identify the method of application by the parcel area

Planning and approach Treated areas We may estimate the average number of treatments per crop We may be able to estimate the total sprayed areas in comparison to the total physical area We may be able to identify the usage of certain types of PPP according to specific periods

Problems faced during the interviewing stage Very small parcels May find several crops on one parcel Successive cropping on same parcel If the farmer has one type of crop spread over a large area then the survey is not as difficult The farmer has many different parcels scattered over a large area and the parcels may not necessarily be next to each other Some farmers do not have site plans

Problems faced during the interviewing stage The farmer has to remember PPP’s used in the previous year Farmer does not keep records Time taken to conduct survey is rather long Can be easily subject to errors due to high amount of paperwork involved Frustration from the farmers point of view Problems faced in small countries where the same farmers are interviewed for various projects. We are always going to the same farmers for different types of information

Example Example of a holding with one crop Summary questionnaire Treated areas questionnaire Example of a holding a number of crops

Progress to date 1st briefing on the 28th June, 2007. Enumerators were provided with all relevant information required for the survey Data collection started in the 2nd week of July Approx 75% of holdings have been interviewed Program still being written in-house at NSO. Data inputting will start as soon as program is ready

Thank you for your attention

Planning and approach Target Population Distribution of holdings by size class of UAA (ha) and typology Size class of UAA (ha) 0.2-<1 1-<5 >=5 Total Typology 1+4+5+7+8 2,113 875 44 3,032 2+3+6 3,696 1,776 113 5,585 5,809 2,651 157 8,617 Back

Planning and approach Sample Design Distribution of holdings by size class of UAA (ha) and typology Size class of UAA (ha) 0.2-<1 1-<5 >=5 Total Typology 1+4+5+7+8 30 50 44 124 2+3+6 53 109 113 275 83 159 157 399 Back