Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (September 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Rhomboid Protease Dynamics and Lipid Interactions
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
The Closing Mechanism of DNA Polymerase I at Atomic Resolution
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Frank J. Smith, Victor P.T. Pau, Gino Cingolani, Brad S. Rothberg 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Sebastiano Pasqualato, Jacqueline Cherfils  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Shehab A. Ismail, Ingrid R. Vetter, Begona Sot, Alfred Wittinghofer 
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Savita Padmanabhan, Douglas M. Freymann  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2018)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
X-Ray Crystallography Reveals a Large Conformational Change during Guanyl Transfer by mRNA Capping Enzymes  Kjell Håkansson, Aidan J. Doherty, Stewart.
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Thermodynamic Basis for Enhanced DNA Binding by a Promiscuous Mutant EcoRI Endonuclease  Paul J. Sapienza, John M. Rosenberg, Linda Jen-Jacobson 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
K-Ras Populates Conformational States Differently from Its Isoform H-Ras and Oncogenic Mutant K-RasG12D  Jillian A. Parker, Alicia Y. Volmar, Spiro Pavlopoulos,
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 1528-1539 (September 2012) An Autoinhibited Noncanonical Mechanism of GTP Hydrolysis by Rheb Maintains mTORC1 Homeostasis  Mohammad T. Mazhab-Jafari, Christopher B. Marshall, Noboru Ishiyama, Jason Ho, Vanessa Di Palma, Vuk Stambolic, Mitsuhiko Ikura  Structure  Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 1528-1539 (September 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2012.06.013 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2012 20, 1528-1539DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Rapid Hydrolysis of mantGTP by Rheb Is Related to Autoinhibitory Role of Tyr35 (A) Hydrolysis of GTP or mantGTP by Rheb (black and green, respectively) and Ras (red and blue, respectively) is shown. Reaction rates derived by curve fitting are presented in the insets. (B) Hydrolysis of GTP by WT Rheb (black), and GTP and mantGTP by Rheb Y35A (green and red, respectively) is presented. Error bars associated with data points in the curves represent SD of the fraction GDP reported by several residues. Error bars in the histograms represent the uncertainty associated with rates derived from curve fitting. See also Figures S1 and S3. Structure 2012 20, 1528-1539DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure and Dynamics of Rheb Y35A (A) Asymmetric unit and electron density of nucleotide substrates are demonstrated. The asymmetric unit of the Rheb Y35A crystal containing one GDP-bound (cyan) and one GMPPNP-bound (green) Rheb molecule is shown in the center. 2Fo-Fc electron density maps at 1.5σ of the nucleotide-binding site with GMPPNP (left) fitted into one Rheb Y35A molecule and GDP (right) in the second molecule of the crystal asymmetric unit is illustrated. Areas bounded by dashed-line rectangles are expanded on the left and right. (B) Ribbon model of GMPPNP-bound Rheb Y35A is shown. Areas bounded by dashed-line rectangles are expanded in (D) and (G), as indicated. (C) Ribbon model of GDP-bound Rheb Y35A in the same orientation as (B) is presented. Area bounded by dashed-line rectangle is expanded in (E). (D)–(G) show overlays of GMPPNP- or GDP-bound Rheb Y35A (colored as above) and WT Rheb in complex with GMPPNP(1XTR) (magenta) or GDP(1XTQ) (gray), as indicated. (D) Mutation of Tyr35 affects the position of the catalytic water (spheres) and γ-phosphate with respect to the carbonyl of Thr38. (E) Minor conformational change of Ala35 in the Rheb mutant upon GTP hydrolysis. The Ala35 Cα and Cβ translocation distances from the GMPPNP-bound form to the GDP-bound form are shown with dotted lines. (F) Major conformational rearrangement of WT Rheb Tyr35 upon GTP hydrolysis, with translocations indicated as in (E). (G) Position of switch II residues relative to the nucleotide-binding site in the activated form of WT Rheb versus that of the Y35A mutant. The backbone of N-terminal switch II residues Gly63-Ser68 and side chains of Asp65 and Glu66 are shown. Two conformations were observed for the Asp65 side chain. (H) 1H-15N HSQC spectra illustrating cross-peaks from switch II residues in WT Rheb (black) and Rheb Y35A (red) in complex with GTP. The panel showing Ser68 is illustrated at a higher contour level for clarity. The reduction in height of the peak from the mutant relative to the WT peak is indicated as a percentage at the bottom of each panel in which it is measurable. The full spectra are shown in Figure S4A. See also Figures S3 and S4. Structure 2012 20, 1528-1539DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Role of Asp65 in Intrinsic and GAP-Mediated GTP Hydrolysis by Rheb (A) Hydrolysis of GTP by WT Rheb (black), the mutants D65A and Y35A (blue and green, respectively), as well as the double-mutant Y35A-D65A (red) is illustrated. Reaction rates derived by curve fitting are presented in the insets. (B) Sensitivity of WT Rheb and Asp65 mutants to TSC2GAP-stimulated GTP hydrolysis is shown. WT, WT+GAP, D65A+GAP, D65E+GAP, and D65N+GAP are shown with black, blue, green, yellow, and red, respectively. Error bars associated with data points in the curves represent SD of the fraction GDP reported by several residues. Error bars in the histograms represent the uncertainty associated with rates derived from curve fitting. See also Figures S1, S2, and S5. Structure 2012 20, 1528-1539DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Tyr35 Hydroxyl Is Required for TSC2GAP-Assisted GTP Hydrolysis (A) Intrinsic and GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis by Rheb Y35A is presented. (B) Intrinsic and GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis by Rheb Y35F is demonstrated. In both graphs the GTPase activities of mutant Rheb with and without TSC2GAP are shown in black and green, respectively, and the TSC2GAP-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis by WT Rheb is shown in blue. Error bars associated with data points in the curves represent SD of the fraction GDP reported by several residues. Error bars in the histograms represent the uncertainty associated with rates derived from curve fitting. See also Figure S4. Structure 2012 20, 1528-1539DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mutations of Rheb Catalytic and Autoinhibitory Residues Impact Rheb's Activation Level and mTORC1 Phosphorylation of p70 S6K (A) Signaling pathway by which growth factors stimulate mTORC1 phosphorylation of p70 S6K is illustrated. (B) Normalized values of p70 S6K phosphorylation for cells starved (−) or stimulated (+) with serum and insulin for 15 min (left) or 6 hr (right) are shown as bar graphs. The background intensity was used as estimation for the error in the intensity measurements and propagated appropriately throughout division. More details are described in Experimental Procedures. Representative western blots are shown in Figure S7. (C) Rheb nucleotide loading monitored in HEK293 cells with 32P-labeling experiment as described in Experimental Procedures is presented. See also Figure S7. Structure 2012 20, 1528-1539DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Schematic Model of Intrinsic and TSC2GAP-Stimulated GTP Hydrolysis by Rheb (A) In WT Rheb, Tyr35 displaces the hydrolytic water away from the backbone carbonyl of Thr38, reducing the polarization and reactivity of this water molecule. Furthermore, Tyr35 reduces the electrostatic contribution of Asp65 to the GTP hydrolysis reaction by displacing this residue away from the nucleotide and the catalytic water. (B) Mutation of Tyr35 allows Asp65 and Thr38 to assemble a more efficient catalytic site. (C) Interaction of the GAP domain of TSC2 with Rheb may reduce the inhibitory effects of Tyr35, allowing Asp65 to promote catalysis in synergy with the Asn thumb (Asn1643) provided in trans by TSC2GAP. See also Figure S6. Structure 2012 20, 1528-1539DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.06.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions