Volume 79, Issue 12, Pages 1353-1360 (June 2011) Continuous cognitive improvement 1 year following successful kidney transplant  Michał Harciarek, Bogdan Biedunkiewicz, Monika Lichodziejewska-Niemierko, Alicja Dębska-Ślizień, Bolesław Rutkowski  Kidney International  Volume 79, Issue 12, Pages 1353-1360 (June 2011) DOI: 10.1038/ki.2011.40 Copyright © 2011 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Statistically significant main group effects as well as interactions between time and group for the longitudinal neuropsychological assessment. Non-parallel lines in each panel represent interactions, whereas relatively parallel lines represent main group effects. (a) Interaction: F=10.48; P<0.001; ηp2=0.23, main group effect: F=6.56; P=0.002; ηp2=0.15. (b) Interaction: F=8.23; P<0.001; ηp2=0.19, trend toward a main group effect: F=5.23; P=0.008; ηp2=0.13. (c) Interaction: F=5.17; P=0.001; ηp2=0.13, main group effect: F=6.61; P=0.002; ηp2=0.16. (d) Interaction: F=6.26; P<0.001; ηp2=0.15, trend toward a main group effect: F=5.01; P=0.009; ηp2=0.12. (e) Interaction: F=6.63; P<0.001; ηp2=0.16, main group effect: F=16.28; P<0.001; ηp2=0.31. (f) Interaction: F=5.07; P=0.001; ηp2=0.12, trend toward a main group effect: F=5.25; P=0.007; ηp2=0.13. (g) Interaction: F=9.57; P<0.001; ηp2=0.23, main group effect: F=10.81; P<0.001; ηp2=0.21. (h) Interaction: F=6.61; P<0.001; ηp2=0.16. (i) Interaction: F=9.54; P<0.001; ηp2=0.21, main group effect: F=12.87; P<0.001; ηp2=0.26. BVMT-R, Brief Visual Memory Test-Revised; MC, matched controls; NTX, patients without kidney transplant; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; RCF, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure; TMT, Trail Making Test; TX, patients with kidney transplant. #The higher the scores, the slower, more impaired the performance. †Trend towards statistical significance. Kidney International 2011 79, 1353-1360DOI: (10.1038/ki.2011.40) Copyright © 2011 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions