A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement  Jarosław Stoliński, MD, PhD, Dariusz Plicner, MD, PhD, Grzegorz Grudzień, MD,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Max B. Mitchell, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Advertisements

Of mice and men and surgical transcatheter aortic valve insertion
Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters  Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,
Emergency use of cardiopulmonary bypass in complicated transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Importance of a heart team approach  Eric E. Roselli, MD,
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right anterior minithoracotomy: Early outcomes and midterm follow-up  Mattia Glauber, MD, Antonio Miceli,
Neurologic complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with and without aortic manipulation: Meta-analysis of 11,398 cases from 8 studies 
Form ever follows function
Victor van Berkel, MD, PhD 
William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD 
Multilevel data analysis: What? Why? How?
Hassane Abdallah, MD, Alaae Boutayeb, MD, Gebrine El Khoury, PhD 
Definition of postoperative bleeding in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: One size doesn't fit all  David Faraoni, MD,
Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: One size fits all?
Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement  Ole Lund, MD, PhD, Martin Bland,
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
Gastric conduit revision after esophagectomy: The raising of Lazarus
The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients
Innovation and science: The future of valve design
The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery  Vinay Badhwar, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and.
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
Fixing the supply problem
Michele Gallo, MD, Gino Gerosa, MD 
A first start for lung transplantation?
Confusion still exists regarding postoperative delirium and its etiology after esophagectomy  Robert B. Cameron, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement: Both excellent therapies  J. James Edelman, MBBS(Hons), PhD, Vinod H. Thourani,
Torsten Doenst, MD, PhD, Markus Richter, MD 
Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005  Scott D. Barnett, PhD,
Joseph A. Dearani, MD, Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD 
Kevin Bridge, MD, MSPH, Robert Saeid Farivar, MD, PhD 
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD 
Sinus of Valsalva aneurysms: Stabilizing the repair destabilizing the aortic valve?  M. Sertaç Çiçek, MD, FACC  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
In search of the smoking gun in calcific aortic valve disease
Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve
Video-assisted resection for lung cancer results in fewer complications  Lunxu Liu, PhD, MD, FRCS  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Influence of experience and the surgical learning curve on long-term patient outcomes in cardiac surgery  Bryan M. Burt, MD, Andrew W. ElBardissi, MD,
We are the company we keep: The importance of the tumor microenvironment  Sai Yendamuri, MD, FACS  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Commentary: Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A high standard of comparison for transcatheter aortic valve implantation  Aaron Martin, MD, Michael.
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Sutureless valve implantation: Every detail counts
Robotic mitral valve surgery: A United States multicenter trial
Aortic valve replacement with the minimal extracorporeal circulation (Jostra MECC System) versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass: A randomized prospective.
Biomaterials for heart valve replacement: Conjectures and refutations
Michael Mack, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
The Mitroflow aortic valve: A past, present, and future illuminated
Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD 
Concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta is free—for some
Jason J. Han, MD, Pavan Atluri, MD 
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Tissue valve, nitinol stent, or storage solution
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Permanent pacemaker insertion following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Not infrequent, not benign, and becoming predictable  Craig M. Jarrett,
The continuing challenge of congenital heart disease in China
Between a rock and a hard place
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Toward a more rational approach in treating type B aortic dissection
Evaluating the best approach to treatment of aortic stenosis: The jury is still out  Glen B. Taksler, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Managing conflicts of interest
Ryan R. Davies, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements  Abby J. Isaacs, MS, Jeffrey Shuhaiber,
Sunjay Kaushal, MD, PhD, Brody Wehman, MD 
Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2
Journal changes and initiatives
Descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: “Busted”
Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair is all about “location, location, location”  Kevin L. Greason, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Deciding how much to pay for effective care
Presentation transcript:

A comparison of minimally invasive and standard aortic valve replacement  Jarosław Stoliński, MD, PhD, Dariusz Plicner, MD, PhD, Grzegorz Grudzień, MD, PhD, Marcin Wąsowicz, MD, PhD, Robert Musiał, MD, Janusz Andres, MD, PhD, Bogusław Kapelak, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 152, Issue 4, Pages 1030-1039 (October 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.012 Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Trends over time of aortic crossclamp time (A), CPB time (B), operation time (C), and postoperative drainage (D) in the RT-AVR group. Data are presented as mean values, and confidence limits are included. 2010 (n = 44), 2011 (n = 56), 2012 (n = 51), 2013 (n = 60). Details are described in the “Results” section. CPB, Cardiopulmonary bypass. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 152, 1030-1039DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.012) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Operation time indicating a learning curve for RT-AVR surgery. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 152, 1030-1039DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.012) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Video 1 Aortic valve replacement through a right anterior minithoracotomy. Video available at http://www.jtcvsonline.org/article/S0022-5223(16)30570-0/addons. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 152, 1030-1039DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.012) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions