Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast  Song Chou, Lan Huang, Haoping Liu  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Advertisements

Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 119, Issue 7, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p)
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Volume 11, Issue 17, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Takashi Kubota, Kohei Nishimura, Masato T. Kanemaki, Anne D. Donaldson 
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Matthew D. Petroski, Raymond J. Deshaies  Molecular Cell 
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Identification and Characterization of an IκB Kinase
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
TopBP1 Controls BLM Protein Level to Maintain Genome Stability
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Regulation of Transcription by Ubiquitination without Proteolysis
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
MyD88: An Adapter That Recruits IRAK to the IL-1 Receptor Complex
Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Mike Tyers  Current Biology 
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (February 1998)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Targeted Proteomic Study of the Cyclin-Cdk Module
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (June 2000)
Junbiao Dai, Weiwu Xie, Troy L. Brady, Jiquan Gao, Daniel F. Voytas 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Specificity of MAP Kinase Signaling in Yeast Differentiation Involves Transient versus Sustained MAPK Activation  Walid Sabbagh, Laura J Flatauer, A.Jane.
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Stress-Induced Phosphorylation of S
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Cdc28-Dependent Regulation of the Cdc5/Polo Kinase
Volume 117, Issue 7, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Dap1/PGRMC1 Binds and Regulates Cytochrome P450 Enzymes
An E3-like Factor that Promotes SUMO Conjugation to the Yeast Septins
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
The Ras/PKA Signaling Pathway Directly Targets the Srb9 Protein, a Component of the General RNA Polymerase II Transcription Apparatus  Ya-Wen Chang, Susie.
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
Sebastian Rumpf, Stefan Jentsch  Molecular Cell 
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
Michael J. Lee, Henrik G. Dohlman  Current Biology 
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
The Engagement of Sec61p in the ER Dislocation Process
The LIN-2/LIN-7/LIN-10 Complex Mediates Basolateral Membrane Localization of the C. elegans EGF Receptor LET-23 in Vulval Epithelial Cells  Susan M Kaech,
MED25 and JAZ7 Compete to Interact with MYC2.
Presentation transcript:

Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast  Song Chou, Lan Huang, Haoping Liu  Cell  Volume 119, Issue 7, Pages 981-990 (December 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.053

Figure 1 Fus3 but Not Kss1 Is Required for Tec1 Degradation in Response to Pheromone Induction (A) HLY3334 (TEC1-HA STE12-myc) was grown to mid-log phase and mixed with an equal amount of wild-type MATα cells (10560-6B). Cells were removed at the indicated times for immunoblotting with an anti-HA antibody (Roche 12C5). Immunoblotting with an anti-PSTAIRE (Santa Cruz) antibody was performed as a loading control. (B) HLY3320 (TEC1-myc) was grown to mid-log phase and treated with 2 μM or 5 μM α factor for the indicated lengths of time. Tec1-myc was detected by immunoblotting with an anti-myc antibody. Ste12 protein level in pheromone treated cells was determined in Strain HLY3321 (STE12-myc). (C) GAL shutdown analysis of wild-type strain (10560-4A) carrying plasmid GAL1p-TEC1-myc. Cells were treated with either no pheromone, 100 nM α factor, or 5 μM α factor. (D) GAL shutdown analysis of Tec1 stability in fus3 (YM106), kss1 (YM105), and far1 (HLY1619) mutants carrying plasmid GAL1p-TEC1-myc in 5μM α factor. Cell 2004 119, 981-990DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.053)

Figure 2 Pheromone-Induced Tec1 Degradation Requires the SCFcdc4 Ubiquitin Ligase and T273 of Tec1 (A) GAL shutdown analysis of Tec1 stability in PY1 (bar1), PY23 (cdc34-3 bar1), PY187 (cdc4-3 bar1), dia2, and grr1 (HLY1377) carrying GAL1p-TEC1-myc in 5 μM α factor. (B) Schematic diagram of Tec1 with a predicted high-affinity Cdc4 binding site. T273 is marked by asterisk. (C) GAL shutdown analysis of Tec1 stability in wild-type (10560-4A) carrying GAL1p-TEC1T273V-myc, induced in 5 μM α factor. Cell 2004 119, 981-990DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.053)

Figure 3 T273 Is Phosphorylated by Fus3 In Vitro and Phospho-T273 Is Detected in α Factor-Induced Cells (A) In vitro phosphorylation of MBP-Tec1 by Fus3. Autoradiograph of MBP-Tec1 phosphorylated by Fus3-myc or Fus3K42R-myc. The amounts of MBP-Tec1 used are the following: lanes 1 and 4, no Tec1; lanes 2 and 5, 100 ng; and lanes 3 and 6, 400 ng. (B and C) MBP-Tec1, phosphorylated by Fus3-TAP in vitro, and Tec1-myc from pheromone-induced cdc34 (PY187) cells were analyzed in nanoflow liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The NanoESI tandem mass spectra of the doubly charged phosphorylated peptide containing T273 at mass to charge (m/z) 633.83 was detected both in vitro (B) and in vivo (C). The peptide sequence was determined as LLpT273PITASNEK, where T273 was phosphorylated both in vitro and in vivo. The amino acid sequence coverage is provided by bn and yn fragment ions for the observed phosphopeptides. bn* or yn* refer to (bn − H3PO4)+ and (yn − H3PO4)+, yn*2+ refers to [(yn+H) − H3PO4)]2+, and MH22+* refers to [(M + 2H) − (H3PO4)]2+, respectively. MH22+ is the selected parent ion. (D) Cdc4 binds to phospho-Tec1 in vitro. In vitro-translated 35S-Cdc4 was incubated with Fus3-phosphorylated MBP-Tec1-FLAG. The recombinant Tec1 protein was precipitated with M2 anti-FLAG agarose. Bound proteins were eluted with FLAG peptide and analyzed by autoradiography (top panel). In vitro-translated Skp1 was included together with Cdc4 in the incubation. Lane 1, 35S-Cdc4 input. Lanes 2, 3, and 4 are immunoprecipitations with the following: no Tec1 (lane 2), Tec1 of mock phosphorylation from untagged cells (lane 3), or Tec1 phosphorylated by Fus3-TAP (lane 4). A portion of the immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and stained with silver (bottom panel) to determine the amount of MBP-Tec1-FLAG precipitated in each immunoprecipitation. Cell 2004 119, 981-990DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.053)

Figure 4 Tec1 Ubiquitination in Pheromone-Treated Cells Requires Fus3, Cdc4, and T273 (A) In vivo ubiquitination assay of Tec1 and Tec1T273V. Strain PY555 (pre1-1 pre4-1) harboring either ADH1p-TEC1-myc or ADH1p-TEC1T273V-myc plasmid was transformed with CUP1p-6xHIS-UBI or CUP1p-UBI (Flick et al., 2004). Cells were grown to OD 0.2–0.3 in selective minimal medium and induced with 100 μM CuSO4 for 3.5 hr and then with 2 μM α factor for another hour. Ubiquitinated proteins were purified with Ni-NTA beads, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed with a peroxidase conjugated anti-myc antibody (Sigma). (B) In vivo ubiquitination assay of Tec1 in wild-type (10560-4A) and fus3 (YM106) harboring ADH1p-TEC1-myc and CUP1p-6xHIS-UBI or CUP1p-UBI. (C) In vivo ubiquitination assay of Tec1 in wild-type (PY1) or cdc4-3 (PY187) with ADH1p-TEC1-myc and CUP1p-6xHIS-UBI or CUP1p-UBI. Cells were grown at 25°C to OD 0.2–0.3 in selective minimal medium, induced with 100 μM CuSO4 for 3 hr, and then switched to 37°C for 20 min before induction with 2 μM α factor for another hour at 37°C. Cell 2004 119, 981-990DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.053)

Figure 5 Fus3 Retains Pathway Specificity during the Pheromone Response by Degrading Tec1 Yeast strains tec1, fus3tec1, kss1tec1, and fus3kss1tec1 carrying a TCS-lacZ plasmid were transformed with either TEC1 or TEC1T273V on CEN plasmids, and the transformants were grown in YEPD to mid-log phase. Half of the cells were induced with 5 μM α factor for 2 hr, while the other half were not. Proteins were extracted for the β-galactosidase assay. β-galactosidase activities shown are averages from 5 to 7 transformants for each strain. Cell 2004 119, 981-990DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.053)

Figure 6 Schematic Diagram of how Fus3 Prevents the Expression of the Filamentation Program during Mating Both Fus3 and Kss1 MAPKs are activated in response to pheromone. They have redundant functions in the transcriptional activation of Ste12/Tec1. Unlike Kss1, Fus3 phosphorylates Tec1, which induces SCFCdc4-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of Tec1. Tec1 degradation precludes the expression of filamentation genes. Cell 2004 119, 981-990DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.053)