Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Hashim Hashim, Christopher R.J. Woodhouse European Urology Supplements Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 25-32 (April 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.eursup.2012.01.004 Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Type 1 renogram. European Urology Supplements 2012 11, 25-32DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2012.01.004) Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Type 2 renogram of left kidney (40mg frusemide administered intravenously at 15min). European Urology Supplements 2012 11, 25-32DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2012.01.004) Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Type 3a renogram bilaterally (5mg frusemide administered intravenously at 15min). European Urology Supplements 2012 11, 25-32DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2012.01.004) Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 Outcome of treated patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) based on diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (DTPA) results. APD=anteroposterior diameter. European Urology Supplements 2012 11, 25-32DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2012.01.004) Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions
Fig. 5 Suggested algorithm for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. APD=anteroposterior diameter; DMSA=dimercaptosuccinic acid; MAG3=mercaptoacetyltriglycine; MCUG=micturating cystourethrogram; SFU=Society of Fetal Ultrasound; USS=ultrasonographic scan. European Urology Supplements 2012 11, 25-32DOI: (10.1016/j.eursup.2012.01.004) Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology Terms and Conditions