Effectiveness Marlene Haffner, MD MPH Haffner Associates, LLC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Susan Boynton, VP, Global Regulatory Affairs, Shire
Advertisements

Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Importance of Pharmacogenetics in Oncology Richard Pazdur, MD. Director Office of Oncology Drug Products Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and.
U of Arizona Innovation Conference 20 September 2011 Marlene E. Haffner, MD, MPH Haffner Associates, LLC.
Career Opportunities for PharmDs in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Research & Development.
Haffner Associates, LLC1 Orphan Drugs – 2011 What’s Happening? Women in BIO Marlene E. Haffner, MD, MPH Office 301.
Stages of drug development
David A H Whiteman MD FAAP FACMG Global Clinical Sciences Leader Shire Pharmaceuticals.
I am a Disease: Where is my Drug?! Dalhousie University January 20, 2011 Marlene E. Haffner, MD, MPH 1.
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research August 2005 Electroretinography: The FDA’s Viewpoint Wiley A. Chambers, MD Deputy Director Division of Anti-Infective.
Obtaining Orphan Product Designation Challenges and pitfalls Marlene E. Haffner, MD, MPH President and CEO Haffner Associates, LLC
Let’s talk about Orphan Drugs Critical Path Institute February 15, 2011 Marlene E. Haffner, MD, MPH 1.
The Accelerating Pace of Medical Development and Challenges in Evaluating Benefit and Risk Alasdair Breckenridge Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory.
Genetic Diseases of Children The Role of Orphan Drugs Marlene E. Haffner, MD, MPH 9 March
Drug Submissions: Review Process Agnes V. Klein, MD Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate February, 2003 www/hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut.
From the Lab to Market Unit 3.04 Understanding Biotechnology research & Development.
Biomedical Research Objective 2 Biomedical Research Methods.
Welcome to Workshop #5: Accelerated Approval (AA) in Rare Diseases: Review of a White Paper Proposal Emil D. Kakkis, M.D., Ph.D. President and Founder.
Regulatory Affairs and Adaptive Designs Greg Enas, PhD, RAC Director, Endocrinology/Metabolism US Regulatory Affairs Eli Lilly and Company.
History of Pediatric Labeling
1 Study Design Issues and Considerations in HUS Trials Yan Wang, Ph.D. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics IV OB/OTS/CDER/FDA April 12, 2007.
FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
1 Operation of the Prescription Drug User Fee Program Janet Woodcock, M.D. Deputy Commissioner for Operations November 14, 2005.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
© Guidant 2005 Surrogate Endpoints and Non-randomized Trials Roseann White Humble Biostatistician.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Introduction to the Meeting Introduction to the Meeting Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18,
Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) Risk Management Public Workshop Day 1 - April 9, 2003 Risk Assessment in Drug and Biological Development Joanna.
Consumer Advocate Perspective Clinical Trials Registration Sharon F. Terry, JAM Sharon F. Terry, JAM President and CEO, Genetic Alliance, Inc. Founding.
Critical Path Initiative Sousan S. Altaie, Ph.D. Scientific Policy Advisor OIVD/CDRH.
Ethical issues with the regulatory use of gene expression data Benjamin S Wilfond MD Medical Genetics Branch National Human Genome Research Institute Department.
Regulatory Considerations for Endpoints Ann T. Farrell, M.D. FDA/CDER/DODP.
Zometa for Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases Protocol 039 Amna Ibrahim, M.D. Oncology Drug Products FDA.
Regulatory and Reimbursement Harmonization An Industry Perspective Adrian Griffin | April 2016.
I farmaci innovativi in una prospettiva europea Giuseppe M.C. Rosano, MD, PhD Cardiovascular and Cell Sciences Research Institute, St George's University.
Clinical Trials.
FDA DRUG APPROVAL FDA’s Lengthy Drug Approval Process in Twelve Steps Overview of the FDA Drug Approval Process Drug Developed June 13, 2016 | Emilia Varrone.
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
June 29, 2017 Suzanne Hendrix, PhD Pentara Corp
Clinical Review Process for New Drug Development and Application
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
Evidence-based Medicine
Industry Perspective: Expanded Access Programs
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Balancing Regulation and Innovation: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
Within Trial Decisions: Unblinding and Termination
Clinical Trials Medical Interventions
Deputy Director, Division of Biostatistics No Conflict of Interest
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Industry’s View
Clinical and Fiscal “Cost of Delay” – a statistician’s view
Introduction of New Technology: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
Erica Takai, PhD for Andrew Farb, M.D.
Regulatory perspective
Clinical Trials.
Issues in Hypothesis Testing in the Context of Extrapolation
Suzanne M. Sensabaugh, MS, MBA
Issues in TB Drug Development: A Regulatory Perspective
Lessons Learned from the Mistakes of Others
FDA Perspective Marco Cannella, PhD Senior Lead Reviewer
Patient Choice Act ….for those you love.
Development Plans: Study Design and Dose Selection
Collaboration Across the Lifecycle of Treatment Development and Safe Use – Contributions from Stakeholders Early Development Later Development Regulatory.
Objective 2 Biomedical Research Methods
Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs
Finding a Balance of Synergy and Flexibility in Master Protocols
Presentation transcript:

Regulatory Considerations for the Development of Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness Marlene Haffner, MD MPH Haffner Associates, LLC World Orphan Drug Congress 2014 April 24, 2014

History of regulation in the drug industry Sulfanilamide - 1938 - safety Thalidomide - 1962 - safety and efficacy PDUFA - 1987 - post marketing requirements REMS - 2007 - stricter post marketing controls for safety and efficacy evaluation Safety and Efficacy - risk/benefit - intertwined

Need for a path to drug development What is the disease and what is known about the disease - Natural History Is the disease life altering/shortening? Is the disease of genetic origin or not? Is the gene known? Are you treating symptoms or affecting the gene? Is the disease monogenic or heterogeneous? Is there a support group for the disease? And what is their interest? What is the drug and how will it affect the disease? Do we know the mechanism of action of the drug? What animal studies have already been done? Is the drug approved for another use? - repurposing

ProActive engagement with patients/advocates and FDA What does FDA need; What do patients want Design the trial to show efficacy - work proactively with FDA Listen to the patients/advocates Codified in FDASIA Know the disease and the natural history of the disease Ongoing activities between FDA and patient groups - PPMD and development of guidance for endpoints in DMD Increasing transparency of all involved - FDA and industry

New potential methodologies for preclinical and early clinical work BioPontis Foundation Other similar models No need to continually reinvent the wheel

Development of Clinical Trials Whenever feasible - placebo controlled. Fastest way to get answers Build in a follow-on with active drug - if appropriate Involve the patient community they know the disease and where patients can be found Small populations have their own difficulties no chance to perform multiple trials Multicenter/multi country trials may be needed with very small populations. Always more than one center. Always hard to find the patients

Endpoint and BioMarker Development Constructive plans for endpoint and biomarker development Validation of surrogate endpoints Involve the patients Expect long term follow-up FDA becoming more involved and interactive May/may not be necessary to utilize surrogates

Reaching the Goal - an Effective Product Goal -to develop an effective and safe product as quickly as possible Many orphan drugs will qualify for “Breakthrough status” Keep the patients involved Continual dialogue with FDA Closely monitor the trials. No opportunity for errors

Orphan Drugs must be Safe and Effective for their intended use FDA is flexible but risk/benefit is the golden rule Orphan disease patients do not want to be exposed to unnecessary risk or lack of efficacy Statistics must be clean - Figures don’t lie; but liars figure! May need to evaluate previously unknown subgroups Work with the patients

Marlene E. Haffner, MD, MPH Questions Marlene E. Haffner, MD, MPH President & CEO 11616 Danville Drive Rockville, Maryland 20852 http://www.mhaffner.com mhaffner3@verizon.net 301 984 5729 (office) 301 641 4268 (cell)