Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Structure of TAR RNA Complexed with a Tat-TAR Interaction Nanomolar Inhibitor that Was Identified by Computational Screening  Zhihua Du, Kenneth E Lind,
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Structure of the Yeast Hst2 Protein Deacetylase in Ternary Complex with 2′-O-Acetyl ADP Ribose and Histone Peptide  Kehao Zhao, Xiaomei Chai, Ronen Marmorstein 
Crystal Structure of E. coli YhbY
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Convergent Evolution of Receptors for Protein Import into Mitochondria
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
The 1. 6 Å Crystal Structure of E
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2000)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The Structure of JNK3 in Complex with Small Molecule Inhibitors
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Structure of E. coli 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine Nucleosidase Reveals Similarity to the Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylases  Jeffrey E.
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages (September 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 205-213 (February 2002) The Structure of Ap4A Hydrolase Complexed with ATP-MgFx Reveals the Basis of Substrate Binding  Jamie I Fletcher, James D Swarbrick, Danuta Maksel, Kenwyn R Gayler, Paul R Gooley  Structure  Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 205-213 (February 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00696-2

Figure 1 Chemical Shift Changes Resulting from Ligand Titrations (A) Titration with the Ap4A analog ApCF2ppCF2pA (fast exchange). (B) Titration with ATP (fast exchange). (C) Titration with ATP in the presence of fluoride (slow exchange). All titrations were carried out at 25°C using 0.6 mM protein samples in the presence of 20 mM MgCl2. The chemical shift change (ΔδTOTAL) was calculated from 2D [15N,1H]-HSQC spectra using ΔδTOTAL = (ΔδN2 + ΔδH2)1/2, with Δδ in Hz. Where resonances were unable to be tracked through titration steps, they were excluded from all three plots. The shift changes shown in (A) and (B) are essentially identical, indicating that the Ap4A analog and ATP bind to the same site on the protein. Similarly, the shift changes observed for the ATP titrations in the absence (B) and presence (C) of fluoride are essentially identical (although the magnitudes are greater in slow exchange), indicating that the ATP binding site is unchanged. The only apparent difference is the additional shift changes observed around residues 116–126 in the ATP·MgFx spectrum, suggesting that this region might be proximal to the MgFx moiety. Structure 2002 10, 205-213DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00696-2)

Figure 2 [1H,15N]-HSQC Spectrum of the Ap4Aase-ATP·MgFx Complex at 25°C Dashed contour lines are resonances that have been folded back into the spectrum. Nonnative N-terminal residues are shown as negative numbers. Structure 2002 10, 205-213DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00696-2)

Figure 3 Sequence Alignment of Animal, Plant, and Bacterial Ap4A Hydrolases Sequences are, from top to bottom, Homo sapiens [35], L. angustifolius [20], and Bartonella bacilliformis [6]. Secondary structure elements and numbering are for L. angustifolius as observed in the current study. ^ denotes residues involved in ligand binding in the lupin protein. Asterisks denote residues previously identified as being strictly conserved in Ap4A hydrolases from plants and pathogenic bacteria [4]. Residues conserved relative to the lupin protein are shown in dark shading, while conservative substitutions are shown in light shading. Structure 2002 10, 205-213DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00696-2)

Figure 4 Structure of the Ap4A Hydrolase-ATP·MgFx Complex All three representations show the structure in the same orientation and the five nonnative N-terminal residues are excluded. (A) Backbone trace of the mean conformation. Every tenth residue is numbered. (B) Stereo view of the 30-member representative ensemble superimposed over the backbone atoms. The five nonnative N-terminal residues are unstructured and are not shown. (C) Ribbon schematic showing the secondary structure. Structure 2002 10, 205-213DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00696-2)

Figure 5 Conformational Changes Resulting from Substrate Binding (A) Overlay of the free and inhibited Ap4Aase structures with changes shown in red on the inhibited structure. (B) As in (A) but viewed from the side. (C) Interactions between the protein and the ATP molecule. Residues interacting with the adenine, ribose, and α-phosphate are shown in magenta, blue, and light green, respectively. Backbone segments interacting with the adenine moiety are shown in orange. Structure 2002 10, 205-213DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00696-2)

Figure 6 Stereo View of the Substrate Positions in Three Nudix Enzyme-Substrate Complexes The three structures were aligned on the common catalytic (Nudix) helix and central four-stranded β sheet. The substrate of each structure is labeled: L. angustifolius Ap4Aase with ATP·MgFx; E. coli ADP-ribose pyrophosphatase with ADP-ribose (Protein Data Bank code 1G9Q) [9]; and E. coli MutT with AMPCPP (Protein Data Bank code 1TUM) [8]. In each structure, the catalytic helix and the central four-stranded β sheet are also shown. Structure 2002 10, 205-213DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00696-2)