Direct Observation of DNA Distortion by the RSC Complex

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Homologous Recombination in Real Time: DNA Strand Exchange by RecA
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Figure 2. Force and concentration dependence of the rate at which ScTopA initiates DNA relaxation. (A) The initial time lag (ITL) for ScTopA activity displays.
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Zhiyu Li, Alfonso Mondragón, Russell J DiGate  Molecular Cell 
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
The Real-Time Path of Translation Factor IF3 onto and off the Ribosome
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Discovering the Power of Single Molecules
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
The Structure of Supercoiled Intermediates in DNA Replication
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Homologous Recombination in Real Time: DNA Strand Exchange by RecA
Characterization of a Triple DNA Polymerase Replisome
Volume 129, Issue 7, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Andreas Hilfinger, Thomas M. Norman, Johan Paulsson  Cell Systems 
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Forward and Reverse Motion of Single RecBCD Molecules on DNA
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Mechanism of Force Generation of a Viral DNA Packaging Motor
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
Efficient Supercoiling of DNA by a Single Condensin Complex as Revealed by Electron Spectroscopic Imaging  David P Bazett-Jones, Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya.
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (March 2015)
DNA Topology and Global Architecture of Point Centromeres
Probing the Energy Landscape of the Membrane Protein Bacteriorhodopsin
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Initiation of Eukaryotic DNA Replication
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Catherine Suski, Kenneth J. Marians  Molecular Cell 
Bending the Rules of Transcriptional Repression: Tightly Looped DNA Directly Represses T7 RNA Polymerase  Troy A. Lionberger, Edgar Meyhöfer  Biophysical.
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
RSC Unravels the Nucleosome
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Real-Time Detection of Single-Molecule DNA Compaction by Condensin I
Microtubule Assembly Dynamics at the Nanoscale
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Computational Analysis of DNA Gyrase Action
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
DNA Polymerase V and RecA Protein, a Minimal Mutasome
Torque Transmission Mechanism via DELSEED Loop of F1-ATPase
XMAP215 Is a Processive Microtubule Polymerase
Presentation transcript:

Direct Observation of DNA Distortion by the RSC Complex Giuseppe Lia, Elise Praly, Helder Ferreira, Chris Stockdale, Yuk Ching Tse-Dinh, David Dunlap, Vincent Croquette, David Bensimon, Tom Owen-Hughes  Molecular Cell  Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 417-425 (February 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.013 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Loop Extrusion by RSC on a Nicked DNA Molecule (A) A single DNA is anchored at one end to a glass surface and at the other to a magnetic bead that is pulled by small magnets placed above the sample. We monitor the molecule's extension (ln) at a fixed force (F ≈ 0.3 pN) and fixed [ATP] = 100 μM. Binding of RSC to DNA decreases its extension by δln. (B) Time traces of the variation in DNA's extension without RSC (Trace A) and in the presence of RSC (Trace B) (nonaveraged raw data [green] and averaged over 1 s [red]). (C) Detail of two different types of events observed with RSC (raw data [green], averaged over 1 s [red], and polygonal fit [black] from which we deduce δln, τon, and τoff; see Experimental Procedures for data treatment). Burst 1, a slow decrease of the extension, followed after a short pause by a quick return to the original extension: δln = 200 nm, τon = 1.96 s, and τoff = 0.13 s. Burst 2, a slow decrease of the extension, followed after a stall (or pause) by a slow return to the original length: δln = 143 nm, τon = 0.57 s, and τoff = 0.58 s. (D) Histogram of the change in extension δln (n = 250 events, error bars are statistical errors). A gaussian fit yields: <δln> = −106 ± 7 nm. (E) Cumulative probability distributions of τon and τoff for all bursts (error bars are statistical errors). The data for the on times were fitted by: Pon (t > τ) = exp(−τ / τon) with τon = 1.14 ± 0.07 s . The off-time data were fitted by: Poff (t > τ) = (1 − p) exp(−τ / τoff) + pδ(τ = 0) with τoff = 0.90 ± 0.13 s and p ≈ 40%; p is the fraction of events with an off time below the temporal resolution of our setup (∼0.5 s). Molecular Cell 2006 21, 417-425DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Dependence of DNA Shortening on ATP Concentration and Stretching Force Dependence of δln (A) on ATP concentration at fixed force F = 0.3 pN and (B) on stretching force F at fixed [ATP] = 100 μM. At large forces (F > 1 pN), the decrease in extension δln is overestimated, because we only record the few events with a size clearly larger than the noise level (with standard deviation σn ∼50 bp). The error bars correspond to the standard deviation of the distribution of δln values. Molecular Cell 2006 21, 417-425DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 AFM Images of RSC Complex on Linear DNA Molecules (A) Images of isolated RSC complexes on a mica surface. (B) Image of a 891 bp linear DNA molecule. (C) Images of RSC-DNA complexes (in presence of 2 μM ATP) located either at the DNA's end or at a midposition. In the latter, two cases notice the presence of a (relaxed or supercoiled) loop associated with the complex (bar = 50 nm). (D) Histograms of the maximal height (h) and diameter (D) for isolated and DNA bound RSC complexes at 2 μM ATP. The similarity of the histograms indicates that in the conditions of our experiments, RSC binds to DNA as a single complex. (E) Distribution of the DNA contour length <l>; without RSC, <l> = 303 ± 2 nm; with RSC but without ATP, <l> = 286 ± 5 nm; and with RSC and 2 μM ATP, <l> = 200 ± 8 nm (the error bars are statistical errors). Molecular Cell 2006 21, 417-425DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Transient DNA Topology Changes Associated with RSC Translocation (A) Time traces on (+) and (−)scDNA, in presence of 100 μM ATP at F = 0.3 pN (raw data [green], and averaged over 1 s [red]). (B) Dependence of δl on ATP concentration for nicked, (−)scDNA, and (+)scDNA (the error bars correspond to the standard deviation of the δl distribution). (C) Sketch showing the effect of twisting during RSC translocation on (+) and (−)scDNA. On (+)scDNA, the generation of a loop negatively twisted by two turns is compensated by the addition of two positive supercoils on the remaining DNA, thus reducing the distance of the bead to the surface. On (−)scDNA, the generation of a negatively supercoiled loop reduces of the number of (−) supercoils in the rest of the molecule and increases in the overall DNA's extension. Molecular Cell 2006 21, 417-425DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Detection of Unconstrained Superhelical Torsion in the Presence of RSC Relaxed pUC18 DNA (40 ng) was incubated in the presence of recombinant E. coli topoisomerase 1A (A, C, and E) or recombinant vaccina topoisomerase 1B (B and D), RSC and ATP as indicated for 1 hr at 30°C. RSC was present at 10 nM (lanes 3 and 4), 33 nM (lanes 5 and 6), 100 nM (lanes 7 and 8), and 300 nM ([F], lanes 9 and 10). After incubation, proteins were removed and topoisomers resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis was performed in the absence of chloroquine (A, B, E, and F) or in the presence of 1 μg/ml chloroquine (C and D). In the presence of RSC and ATP, faster-migrating supercoiled DNA was detected in the presence of topoisomerase 1A, which selectively removes negative supercoils. The mobility of this DNA was increased rather than reduced in the presence of chloroquine, indicating that this DNA is positively supercoiled (C). Little change in DNA topology was detected after incubation with RSC and vaccina topoisomerase 1B, indicating that RSC is not stably wrapped by the complex. In (F), reactions were performed in the absence of topoisomerases and loaded directly onto 0.3× TBE agarose gel. This shows that the changes in topology detected in (A) and (C) were obtained under conditions in which DNA is partially bound by RSC. Molecular Cell 2006 21, 417-425DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Model for DNA Translocation by RSC In order to form loops on DNA, the RSC complex must make at least two contacts with DNA. If one of these contacts is capable of DNA translocation, DNA could be drawn into a loop (red arrow) in the presence of ATP as shown in (i)–(iii). Once formed, we observe that the majority of loops are removed in an ATP-dependent reaction that could occur as a result of translocation in the reverse orientation (iii), (iv), and (i). In some cases, we observe loops collapsing rapidly. This could occur if either the translocase disengages or another contact constraining DNA is lost (iii), (v), and (i). In this latter case, the translocase would be likely to restart the cycle at a different location on the DNA fragment. Consistent with this, we observed ATP-dependent redistribution of RSC complexes toward the DNA ends in the AFM images. As we observe differences in the degree of supercoiling under different conditions, it is likely that in some cases torsion could be partially relaxed as a result of slippage, (v)–(ii), in a manner similar to what has been reported for FtsK (Saleh et al., 2005). Molecular Cell 2006 21, 417-425DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.013) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions