SGK3 Mediates INPP4B-Dependent PI3K Signaling in Breast Cancer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Advertisements

Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Histone Demethylase LSD2 Acts as an E3 Ubiquitin Ligase and Inhibits Cancer Cell Growth through Promoting Proteasomal Degradation of OGT  Yi Yang, Xiaotong.
DEPTOR, an mTOR Inhibitor, Is a Physiological Substrate of SCFβTrCP E3 Ubiquitin Ligase and Regulates Survival and Autophagy  Yongchao Zhao, Xiufang Xiong,
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Wenqi Wang, Nan Li, Xu Li, My Kim Tran, Xin Han, Junjie Chen 
Volume 137, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
PRAS40 Is an Insulin-Regulated Inhibitor of the mTORC1 Protein Kinase
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Serine Phosphorylation by mTORC1 Promotes IRS-1 Degradation through SCFβ-TRCP E3 Ubiquitin Ligase  Yosuke Yoneyama, Tomomi Inamitsu, Kazuhiro Chida, Shun-Ichiro.
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Lizhong Xu, Veronica Lubkov, Laura J. Taylor, Dafna Bar-Sagi 
Lysine 63 Polyubiquitination of the Nerve Growth Factor Receptor TrkA Directs Internalization and Signaling  Thangiah Geetha, Jianxiong Jiang, Marie W.
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Terunao Takahara, Tatsuya Maeda  Molecular Cell 
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
The BRAF Oncoprotein Functions through the Transcriptional Repressor MAFG to Mediate the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype  Minggang Fang, Jianhong Ou,
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Rsk1 mediates a MEK–MAP kinase cell survival signal
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Fan Yang, Huafeng Zhang, Yide Mei, Mian Wu  Molecular Cell 
Prolonged Rapamycin Treatment Inhibits mTORC2 Assembly and Akt/PKB
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
The Tumor Suppressor PP2A Aβ Regulates the RalA GTPase
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
by Jianping Guo, Abhishek A
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Kristin K. Brown, Laleh Montaser-Kouhsari, Andrew H. Beck, Alex Toker 
by Emilie Clement, Hiroyuki Inuzuka, Naoe T
Phosphorylation and Functional Inactivation of TSC2 by Erk
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2011)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Presentation transcript:

SGK3 Mediates INPP4B-Dependent PI3K Signaling in Breast Cancer Jessica A. Gasser, Hiroyuki Inuzuka, Alan W. Lau, Wenyi Wei, Rameen Beroukhim, Alex Toker  Molecular Cell  Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages 595-607 (November 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.023 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2014 56, 595-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.023) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 SGK3 Is Amplified in Breast Cancer (A) Copy-number profiles across chromosome 8 (y axis) for 3,131 cancer samples (x axis). A magnified view of the region including the SGK3 gene locus is shown in the inset. Analysis was performed from a data set obtained from a study of 3,131 cancers of over 25 subtypes. Samples are sorted by frequency of amplification at the SGK3 locus. (B) Copy-number profiles from 243 breast cancers selected from the data set described in (A). (C) Cell lysates derived from the indicated breast epithelial and cancer cell lines, serum starved (−) or stimulated with IGF-1 for 20 min (+), were immunoblotted (IB) with the indicated antibodies. (D) T47D cells were serum starved for 24 hr and then pretreated with the indicated inhibitors rapamycin (100 nM), A66 (1 μM), or BKM120 (1 μM) for 20 min and stimulated with IGF-1 for a further 20 min. SGK3 was immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-SGK3 and subjected to an in vitro kinase assay (IVK) using GSK-3β peptide substrate. Peptide substrate phosphorylation was detected using an anti-GSK-3β pS9 antibody. SGK3 phosphorylation was detected using anti-SGK3 pT320. Total SGK3 was evaluated as control. Whole-cell lysates (WCLs) were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments. See also Figures S1 and S5. Molecular Cell 2014 56, 595-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.023) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 INPP4B Positively Regulates SGK3 Activity (A) HeLa cells were transfected with SGK3-GST alone or with INPP4B and serum starved for 24 hr prior to stimulation with IGF-1 for 20 min. SGK3 was isolated from cell lysates with glutathione beads and incubated with GST-GSK-3β peptide in an in vitro kinase assay. Peptide substrate phosphorylation was detected using an anti-GSK-3β pS9 antibody. Total SGK3 was evaluated as control. Whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. (B) HEK293T cells were transfected with wild-type INPP4B, catalytically inactive INPP4B.C842A, or Vps34 and then serum starved for 24 hr and stimulated with IGF-1 for 20 min. Whole-cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. (C) ZR-75-1 cells were infected with shRNA lentivirus targeting INPP4B or with control pLKO, serum starved, and stimulated with IGF-1 for 20 min. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. (D) MCF7 cells were infected with shRNA lentivirus targeting INPP4B, followed by retroviral infection with INPP4B cDNA rescue virus. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2014 56, 595-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.023) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 SGK3 Promotes Anchorage-Independent Growth (A) ZR-75-1 cells were infected with pLKO vector control, INPP4B, or SGK3 shRNA lentiviral vectors and grown in agar/growth media for 28 days. Additional conditions included retroviral infection of INPP4B (INPP4B∗) and SGK3 (SGK∗) cDNA rescue virus or INPP4B-CD∗ and SGK3-KD∗ (catalytically inactive mutants). (B) The number of colonies in soft agar obtained in (A) was quantitated using MATLAB software. (C) Immunoblot analysis of whole-cell lysates from (A) and (B) with the indicated antibodies. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments. (D) ZR-75-1 cells infected with control pLKO, INPP4B.shRNA2, or shRNA-resistant INPP4B cDNA rescue were injected into the mammary fat pad of nude mice. Tumor volume was measured by calipering at 7 weeks postinjection. Error bars represent the SD. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001; N/S, not significant. See also Figures S3 and S5. Molecular Cell 2014 56, 595-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.023) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 SGK3 Regulates 3D Growth of Breast Cancer Cells (A) ZR-75-1 cells were infected with control pLKO, SGK3 shRNA, or INPP4B shRNA, alone or in combination with cDNA rescue alleles of wild type (INPP4B∗ and SGK3∗) or catalytically inactive mutants (INPP4B-CD∗ and SGK3-KD∗) and grown for 8 days in 3D Matrigel/growth media. Representative images of spheroids at 4× magnification are shown. (B) Quantitation of 2D spheroid size from (A) was performed using ImageJ software. Error bars represent the SD. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Results are representative of at least three independent experiments. See also Figures S3 and S5. Molecular Cell 2014 56, 595-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.023) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 SGK3 Promotes Breast Cancer Cell Invasive Migration (A) SUM159PT breast cancer cells were infected with SGK3 or pLEGFP followed by a 2 hr migration through Transwell assays. Relative migration is measured along the y axis as the ratio of migrated cells in the test condition versus the control. (B) ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells were infected with SGK3 or INPP4B shRNA lentiviral vectors or control pLKO for 48 hr followed by Transwell migration assays. (C) MCF7 cells were inhibited with SGK inhibitor GSK650394 (10 μM) or control DMSO for 20 min prior to Transwell migration. (D) HS578T breast cancer cells were infected with SGK3 of control pLEGFP-N1 followed by Transwell Matrigel invasion assays. Error bars represent the SD. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figures S4 and S5. Molecular Cell 2014 56, 595-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.023) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 NDRG1 Is an FBW7 Substrate (A) MCF7 cells were infected with SGK3 shRNA, Akt1 shRNA, or control pLKO, serum starved, and then stimulated with IGF-1 for 20 min. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. (B) MCF10A cells were treated with cycloheximide (CHX) or control DMSO for the indicated times, and cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-NDRG1 and anti-p85. (C) T47D, MCF10A, MCF7, and ZR-75-1 cells were treated with MG132 for 16 hr and immunoblotted with anti-NDRG1 and anti-p85. (D) Cell lysates of wild-type (Fbw7 WT) or DLD-1 colon cancer cells null for Fbw7 (Fbw7−/−) were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. The arrow indicates the Fbw7 protein band. (E) MCF7 cells were infected with two distinct Fbw7 shRNAs or control pLKO, and lysates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. The arrow indicates the Fbw7 protein band. (F) HEK293T cells were transfected with control GFP vector, alone or with the indicated combinations of NDRG1-FLAG, HA-Fbw7, HA-GSK-3β.S9A, and SGK3-GST. NDRG1 stability was evaluated by immunoblotting whole-cell lysates with anti-FLAG and the indicated antibodies. The arrow indicates the GSK-3β protein band migrating above a nonspecific protein. (G) HEK293T cells were transfected for 48 hr with NDRG1-FLAG prior to 5 hr treatment with GSK650394, SB415286, GSK650394 and SB415286, or MG132 in order to examine NDRG1 protein stability. (H) A His-ubiquitin assay was performed after transfection of HEK293T cells with FLAG-NDRG1, GST-Fbw7, HA-GSK-3β.S9A, SGK3-GFP, and His-Ub, followed by treatment with MG132 for 12 hr. Nickel NTA beads were used to isolate His-ubiquitin complexes, followed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. (I) ZR-75-1 cells were transfected for 24 hr with pcDNA3, NDRG1, 8A-NDRG1, Fbw7, GSK-3β, and SGK3 followed by an 18 hr Transwell migration assay. Quantification of migrated cells and representative immunoblots of whole-cell lysates with the indicated antibodies are shown. Error bars represent the SD. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S6. Molecular Cell 2014 56, 595-607DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2014.09.023) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions