An Overview of the Achievement Profile Data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Take PLAN? PLAN shows your strengths and weaknesses in English, mathematics, reading, and science. PLAN lets you know if you’re on target for college.
Advertisements

Understanding Accountability Reports. Where Do I Find These Reports? Counselor Principal School Improvement Specialist System Testing Coordinator State.
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Reading and Writing Testing Results USD 244 Board of Education March 12, 2001.
A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11.
Using EVAAS to Improve Student Performance Heather Stewart Jody Cleven Region 4 PD Leads NCDPI.
AZ Learns and A-F Letter Grades Arizona Department of Education Presentation to the NCAASE Committee ASU Washington Center, Washington D.C. March 7, 2012.
Dr. Michael Flicek Education Consultant October 8, 2013 Wyoming School Performance Rating Model Report to: Wyoming State Board of Education.
Arizona LEARNS: Overview of the Achievement Profiles.
Two Accountability Systems This Year NCLB AZ Learns Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Yes / No Excelling, Highly- Performing, Performing, Underperforming.
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,
SAT 10 (Stanford 10) 2013 Nakornpayap International School Presentation by Ms.Pooh.
Understanding The PLAN. What Do My Scores Mean?  Your scores range between 1 and 32.  The PLAN takes the number of correct responses on each test and.
Department of Mathematics and Science Millard E. Lightburn, Ph.D. District Science Supervisor Mary Tweedy, Noreyda Casañas, Daniel Gangeri Curriculum Support.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
School Accountability Update July 2005-March 2006.
2014 A - F Letter Grades - AIMS The State of Arizona utilizes AIMS to measure student growth. In measuring student growth, the State of Arizona then identifies.
7 th Grade: Decreased # of students in Basic by 7% 8 th Grade: Students are moving from BB to BAS scale EOC Literacy: Students are moving from BB to BAS.
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Science and Social Studies Testing Results USD 244 Board of Education April 9, 2001.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
Student Data Toolkit Example August 2006.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
AIMS This test is to ensure student progress but what does it all mean?!?!
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
Tanaina Elementary SBA Data Look May rd Grade SBA Advanced Proficient Below Proficient Far Below 91.9%
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
Participation in Math Class: The Effect on Student Achievement By: Nicolas Millet.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
Arizona LEARNS: Overview of the Achievement Profiles.
HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007…………………………
TRANSITION OF PA’S ASSESSMENT SYSTEM: IMPACT ON PVAAS?
Parent’s Guide to Individual Profile Report
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
How the CAP Science and Social Studies Tests Measure Student Growth.
Presented to West Manor Administration and Faculty By: Felicia Belcher April 16, 2014.
Preliminary School Performance Grades
Legislative Requirement 2013
Teacher SLTs
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Sheffield Performance Overview
Teacher SLTs
Two Accountability Systems This Year
Proactive Assessments
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Teacher SLTs
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Data Tables Packet #19.
3 Essential Questions: How am I doing so far?
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
Teacher SLTs
Spring 2019 James Bowie Middle School 8th Grade Student Presentation
AYP and Report Card.
Understanding Progress 8
Data Analysis Questions
Data Overview April 2014 Sweetwater Elementary
Statistics 5/19/2019.
N.C.T.S. November 23, 2014 N.C.T.S. Staff By: Kristen Cooper !
Findley Oaks Elementary Data Overview
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Teacher SLTs
Evidence of Sexual Bias in Graduate School Admissions
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Purpose of This Deck This slide deck is intended for use by site administrators to provide information to Parents about the California School Dashboard.
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of the Achievement Profile Data

The online report shows both state and TUSD data for School Designation …. School Designation Using TUSD Data School Designation Using ADE Data

..and subject by grade level Designation. Subject by Grade Level Designation Using ADE Data ..and subject by grade level Designation. Subject by Grade Level Designation Using TUSD Data

What does a discrepancy mean? Any discrepancy between ratings (Subject/Grade or Overall) indicates a rating close to change.

Baseline Percent Mastery The percent of students with Meeting or Exceeding scores on the AIMS in School Year 99-00

Baseline Percent Falls Far Below The percent of students with Falls Far Below scores on the AIMS in School Year 99-00

Baseline Group The Baseline Group is determined by the percent of students with meeting or exceeding scores on AIMS in school year 99-00 (the baseline year). Cut points for Baseline Groups differ across subjects and grade levels.

Past 3-Year Percent Mastery The average percent of students with Meeting or Exceeding scores on the AIMS for School Years 99-00 00-01 01-02

Past 3-Year Percent Falls Far Below The average percent of students with Falls Far Below scores on the AIMS for School Years 99-00 00-01 01-02

Change Points: Meeting or Exceeding Change points for Meeting and Exceed are computed as (3yr avg %) – (Baseline %)

Change Points: Falls Far Below Change points for Falls Far Below are computed as (Baseline %) - (3yr avg %)

Added Evidence Added Evidence for Reading is based on the percent of students with OYG from Stan9 Reading Added Evidence for Math is based on the percent of students with OYG from Stan9 Math Added Evidence for Writing is based on the percent of students with scores of 24 or higher on the Extended Writing portion of the AIMS *Added Evidence for a High School is based on Dropout and Graduation Rates

Total Change Points Total Change points are the Sum of M/E Change Points, FFB Change Points, and Added Evidence

Cut Points for Lower and Higher Categories This is the number of points required for the next Highest Designation This is the number of points required for the next Lowest Designation

Cut Points for Lower and Higher Categories (Example) For Example: This school is very close in 3rd grade writing to the Improving cut point (noted in green).

Cut Points for Lower and Higher Categories (Example) They are also close in 3rd grade math to the Maintaining cut point (noted in green).

Cut Points for Lower and Higher Categories (Example) However, This school is also close in 5th grade writing to the lower cut point.

Questions?