Critical Thinking Framework analysis and evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Communication for Managers Testing the Evidence What is the source of the evidence? Is the source valid and credible? Is the evidence accurate, current.
Advertisements

Argumentative /Persuasive Reading & writing
CT is a self-directed process by which we take deliberate steps to think at the highest level of quality. CT is skillful, responsible thinking that is.
Copyright © 2011, Terry Hudson.  Aristotle: “Rhetoric is the observance of all available means of persuasion.” - The Rhetorica Copyright © 2011, Terry.
Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Session 3. Copyright © 2008, Terry Hudson Chapter 2 – Argument Coordination Relationship between arguer and recipient as.
Evaluating Thinking Through Intellectual Standards
OCTOBER 25, 2010 PLEASE TAKE YOUR PAPERS FROM THE FOLDERS. (DO NOT LEAVE THEM, TAKE THEM WITH YOU.) YOUR MIDTERM WILL BE RETURNED TO YOU ON WEDNESDAY.
Human Communication THIRD EDITION ◄ Judy C. Pearson  Paul E. Nelson  Scott Titsworth  Lynn Harter ► C H A P T E R F I F T E E N Persuasive Presentations.
Persuasive Media.  Persuasive media includes any text that attempts to sell a product or a service to a consumer.  All persuasive media attempts influence.
Writing Persuasive Messages Chapter 10. Purpose To change your audience’s beliefs, actions, or values by providing sound, credible advice to solutions,
Chapter Seventeen: Persuasive Speaking. Ch17: Persuasive Speaking Copyright © 2006 Wadsworth 2.
Critical Thinking Implementing the hypothesis and supporting evidence.
Three Methods for Building Arguments
Persuasion Principles of Speech Chapter What is Persuasion? How have you been persuaded today? Used in all aspects of life Both verbal and non-verbal.
Critical Thinking Models Presented by STEVE COXON, Ph.D. Assistant professor of gifted education.
PERSUASION. “Everybody Hates Chris”
Argument Language is a form of motivated action. Argument as Discourse It’s important to understand that for the purposes of this class, Argument means.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Copyright © 2007, Terry Hudson Session 1. Copyright © 2007, Terry Hudson Classical Rhetorical Analysis Aristotle: “Rhetoric is the observance of all available.
Is Everything an Argument?
Introduction to Public Speaking Chapters 15 and 16.
Methods of persuasion Chapter 17 Recap.
{ Methods of Persuasion Speech class.  The audience perceives the speaker as having high credibility  The audience is won over by the speaker’s evidence.
: the art or skill of speaking or writing formally and effectively especially as a way to persuade or influence people.
Argumentation by Laurie G. Kirszner & Stephan R. Mandell.
Suzanne Webb Lansing Community College WRIT122 January 11, 2010.
Using Fundamental and Powerful Concepts to Help Students Think Critically about Your Course Bill Reynolds Associate Professor of Social Work Director,
Informative Synthesis  Purpose: to convey information through summarizing in a clear, concise, organized manner (154)  Use source material to support.
Chapter 24: Persuasive Speaking
Argumentative Terms Quiz “Jeopardy Style”. Single Sided Arguments.
Nahid Al-Bakri ( ) Aisha Al_khaldi( ) Lama Al-bassam( )
Instructional Critical Thinking Assessment Item Development
The Rhetorical Triangle (Aristotelian Triangle)
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Cognitive Apprenticeship: A Roadmap for Critical Thinking
Three Methods for Building Arguments
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
Elements of Reasoning:
Chapter 16 and 17 Review December 8, 2008.
Critical Thinking.
Critical Reading in Practice
How do we evaluate an argument for effectiveness?
Activity 1.7: Visual Argument
Critical Thinking Process
Introduction to Style Analysis, and Argumentation Chs 3 and 4, RRW
Everything is an Argument.
Writing an Argument CH. 8.
Cognitive Apprenticeship: A Roadmap for Critical Thinking
CT is a self-directed process by which we take deliberate steps to think at the highest level of quality. CT is skillful, responsible thinking that is.
Rhetoric Rhetoric: Using language to persuade..
Persuading your Audience
Activity 1.7: Visual Argument
John Tacapan Faculty Long Beach City College
Persuasion Writer attempts to influence an audience to take action or
Critical reading and Critique
Barnet, Bellanca, Stubbs Presentation #3
Toulmin Model AP Lang. & Comp. Ch. 3
Analyzing subjective and objective statements within text
UNDERSTANDING THE ELEMENTS OF PERSUASION
Chapter 17: Persuasive Speeches
ACADEMIC DEBATE.
Critical reading and Critique
Chapter 15 Objectives Identify four action goals of persuasive speaking Distinguish between immediate behavioral purposes and ultimate goals Describe and.
Everything is an Argument.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 24
AICE General Paper What IS this class?.
Rhetoric Notes.
Elements of an Argument
Different Shades of Green
Implementing the hypothesis and supporting evidence
Presentation transcript:

Critical Thinking Framework analysis and evaluation Monday, March 17, 2008 Blocks 5 & 6 COMM 306

Critical Thinking Framework analysis and evaluation Today’s objectives: To learn a concise, flexible CT framework To use the framework to help us think more deeply and clearly about issues related to 306 To use the framework to develop questions about global poverty that will help us focus our research on the best sources to inform our understanding of the course material

Critical Thinking Framework analysis and evaluation We can use the Elements of Thought to build our own strong, clear, persuasive messages for particular audiences We can apply the Elements of Thought to whole or parts of verbal, oral, & visual messages to determine their soundness, validity, value

Critical Thinking Framework Audience Argumentation Claims/premises assertions, opinions Aristotelian ethos logos pathos Toulmin qualifiers rebuttals Rogerian opposition common ground compromise point of view Elements of Thought purpose implications question at issue artistic inartistic assumptions information data, facts concepts interpretation inference clarity accuracy relevance depth breadth logic Fallacies—generalization, slippery slope, ad hominem, weak analogy Intellectual Standards