RAS Proteins and Their Regulators in Human Disease

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model for regulation of the Ras p21 product and for the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) as a downstream effector and regulator of ras activity. Ras is.
Advertisements

Germline Missense Mutations Affecting KRAS Isoform B Are Associated with a Severe Noonan Syndrome Phenotype  Claudio Carta, Francesca Pantaleoni, Gianfranco.
AMPK—Sensing Energy while Talking to Other Signaling Pathways
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Sustaining Proliferative Signaling and Evading Growth Suppressors
Zachary Lee Johnson, Jue Chen  Cell 
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages (May 2003)
G. Aaron Hobbs, Alfred Wittinghofer, Channing J. Der  Cancer Cell 
Fixing a Hole Where the Ras Gets In
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 Complex
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
HOPX: The Unusual Homeodomain-Containing Protein
Mechanisms of TGF-β Signaling from Cell Membrane to the Nucleus
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
From Promiscuity to Precision: Protein Phosphatases Get a Makeover
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
AMPK—Sensing Energy while Talking to Other Signaling Pathways
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Membrane Traffic: Trans-Golgi Tethers Leave a Surprisingly Small GAP
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Signaling Interplay in Ras Superfamily Function
RalGDS comes of age Cancer Cell
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
AKT/PKB Signaling: Navigating the Network
Raf-1 Cysteine-Rich Domain Increases the Affinity of K-Ras/Raf at the Membrane, Promoting MAPK Signaling  Shuai Li, Hyunbum Jang, Jian Zhang, Ruth Nussinov 
Structure of DDB1 in Complex with a Paramyxovirus V Protein: Viral Hijack of a Propeller Cluster in Ubiquitin Ligase  Ti Li, Xiujuan Chen, Kenneth C.
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
Structure, Exchange Determinants, and Family-Wide Rab Specificity of the Tandem Helical Bundle and Vps9 Domains of Rabex-5  Anna Delprato, Eric Merithew,
GEFs and GAPs: Critical Elements in the Control of Small G Proteins
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Rab35/ACAP2 and Rab35/RUSC2 Complex Structures Reveal Molecular Basis for Effector Recognition by Rab35 GTPase  Lin Lin, Yingdong Shi, Mengli Wang, Chao.
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
Hilde van Hattum, Herbert Waldmann  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Structure of the BRCT Repeats of BRCA1 Bound to a BACH1 Phosphopeptide
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 153, Issue 7, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Guilty as charged Cancer Cell
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Hinrich Gronemeyer, Arthur Zelent  Cancer Cell 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
K-Ras Populates Conformational States Differently from Its Isoform H-Ras and Oncogenic Mutant K-RasG12D  Jillian A. Parker, Alicia Y. Volmar, Spiro Pavlopoulos,
Presentation transcript:

RAS Proteins and Their Regulators in Human Disease Dhirendra K. Simanshu, Dwight V. Nissley, Frank McCormick  Cell  Volume 170, Issue 1, Pages 17-33 (June 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Conformational Changes in Switch Regions when RAS Transitions from Inactive GDP-Bound State to Active GTP-Bound State Switch I and switch II regions are colored blue and violet, respectively, and side chain atoms of residues that undergo large conformation changes during transition are shown in stick representation. Interactions formed by γ-phosphate and magnesium ions are shown using dashed lines. HRAS.GDP and HRAS.GppNHp are from PDB: 4Q21 and 5P21, respectively. RAS is activated by GDP/GTP exchange stimulated by GEFs and inactivated by GTP hydrolysis stimulated by GAPs. Cell 2017 170, 17-33DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The RAS Pathway Genes highlighted in pink are frequently deleted in human cancers and RASopathies, as described in the text. Genes in green are frequently activated by mutation. This pathway is a simplified version of the pathways illustrated on http://www.cancer.gov compiled by the RAS Initiative and the RAS research community. Cell 2017 170, 17-33DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Schematic of the Four Human RAS Proteins In humans, three RAS genes encode four distinct isoforms: HRAS, NRAS, and the two splice variants of KRAS gene, KRAS4a and KRAS4b, containing exons 4a and 4b, respectively. All four RAS isoforms contain identical residues in the first half of the GTPase domain (G-domain) and they share 82% sequence identity in the second half of the G-domain. The last 19-20 amino acids located at the C-terminal end exhibit significant sequence diversity among RAS isoforms and constitute the “hypervariable region (HVR)”. Unlike the other RAS isoforms, KRAS4b is not palmitoylated and contains a polybasic region (shown in blue color). In the figure, G-domains are shown in ribbon representation and membrane anchored farnesyl and palmitoyl lipid chains are shown in orange and green color. Cell 2017 170, 17-33DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structure of Full-Length Farnesylated and Methylated KRAS4b in Complex with PDEδ This structure (PDB: 5TAR) provided atomic details of the hypervariable region for the first time. In this structure, HVR residues 166-180 extend helix 5. In the figure, KRAS4b and PDEδ are shown in ribbon and surface representations whereas prenylated C185 and GDP are shown in sphere and stick representations, respectively. Cell 2017 170, 17-33DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Phylogenetic Analysis and Conservation of Switch I Region in Members of RAS Subfamily (A) Phylogenetic analysis using full-length protein sequence of members of RAS subfamily proteins from humans. (B) Multiple sequence alignment showing conservation of residues in the switch I region in different members of RAS subfamily in humans. Cell 2017 170, 17-33DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 MRAS Recruits the Phosphatase PP1c to the Plasma Membrane and De-phosphorylates S259 on CRAF Bound to Active RAS Amongst all RAS subfamily members, only MRAS (shown in blue color) binds SHOC2.PP1c, and it does so in a GTP-dependent manner. Recruitment of this complex to the plasma membrane de-phosphorylates the negative regulatory site on CRAF, S259, and equivalent sites on ARAF and BRAF. This step is essential for efficient signal transduction from RAS to the MAPK cascade. Cell 2017 170, 17-33DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 KRAS Residues with Higher Mutational Frequency in Cancer (A) KRAS residues with more than 10 mutations in cBioPortal database for cancer genomics are shown along with number of mutations in parenthesis. All these residues are in the switch regions or in the G1-G5 sequence motifs that play a critical role in recognition and binding of guanine nucleotide. (B) Position of KRAS residues (shown in green color) with more than 10 mutations in cBioPortal database are mapped on the tertiary structure of KRAS.GDP (PDB: 4EPV). Cell 2017 170, 17-33DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.009) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions