MC simulation of test beam events Fabrizio Salvatore (RHUL)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pete Truscott QinetiQ Space LoB
Advertisements

Plateforme de Calcul pour les Sciences du Vivant Lydia Maigne GATE/G4 meeting collaboration - 12/09/07 - Hebden Bridge 1 Electron.
The CALICE test beam at CERN Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London (on behalf of the Calice Collaboration) SPSC meeting, CERN, Geneva,
GATE Optical Imaging SHFJ Status Report vesna et sebastien July 1 st 2012 July 1 st 2012 HGATE - Brest.
Geant4 v9.2p02 User Interface I Makoto Asai (SLAC) Geant4 Tutorial Course.
ZEUS high Q 2 e + p NC measurements and high-x cross sections A.Caldwell Max Planck Institute for Physics On behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration Allen Caldwell.
1 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Thoughts on transverse energy profile for e/m showers David Ward  We have work from G.Mavromanolakis on this.
1 Calice UK Analysis Meeting 23/1/07David Ward Cambridge data analysis work David Ward Main focus – data-MC comparisons Using “official” reconstructed.
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
1 Calice Meeting 20/9/06David Ward What did we learn from DESY 2005 run? DESY run May CERN run August Data/MC comparisons for ECAL.
Drift Chambers at DESY and CERN Mike Green, Fabrizio Salvatore, Michele Faucci Giannelli.
28 Feb 2006Digi - Paul Dauncey1 In principle change from simulation output to “raw” information equivalent to that seen in real data Not “reconstruction”,
Status of Tracking at DESY Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Hakan Yilmaz, Anne Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis, Fabrizio Salvatore.
March 6th, 2006CALICE meeting, UCL1 Position and angular resolution studies with ECAL TB prototype Introduction Linear fit method Results with 1, 2, 3,
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Status of MAPS Geometry Simulation Yoshinari Mikami University of Birmingham 17th MAY 2006 MAPS Meeting at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Calice Meeting / DESY/January 2004D.R. Ward1 David Ward University of Cambridge Test beam requirements? Studies of cuts and models Fluka studies Clustering.
A preliminary analysis of the CALICE test beam data Dhiman Chakraborty, NIU for the CALICE Collaboration LCWS07, Hamburg, Germany May 29 - June 3, 2007.
Geant4-based Simulation Status and Plans Dhiman Chakraborty, Guilherme Lima, Jeremy McCormick, Vishnu Zutshi Calorimetry Working Group ALCPG 2004 Winter.
Simulation of the CALICE Test Beams with MOKKA Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London.
ZHH channel: software and detector performances for ILC Michele Faucci Giannelli Fabrizio Salvatore Mike Green, Tao Wu.
Calice Meeting -- Montreal 10th-12th May 2006 Anne-Marie Magnan -- IC London 1 Simulation for CALICE testbeams  Introduction  Test beam configurations.
1 Beam e ’s from antineutrinos using the pME and LE beams David Jaffe, Pedro Ochoa December 8 th 2006  Part 1: Reminder and update  Part 2: Change in.
1 Calice UK Analysis Meeting 23/1/07David Ward/Nige Watson UK Analysis tasks (WP1) David Ward Nige Watson TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.
Inside the new Mokka release Fabrizio Salvatore (RHUL) Gabriel Musat (LLR) Paulo Mora de Freitas (LLR)
29 Mar 2007Tracking - Paul Dauncey1 Tracking/Alignment Status Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Anne-Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis,
1 Calice UK s/w meeting RHUL 24/1/06D.R. Ward David Ward Have previously reported on comparison of Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 Monte Carlos. Issues with.
Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole
Interactions of pions in the Si-W ECAL prototype Towards a paper Naomi van der Kolk.
Geant4 Acceptance Suite for Key Observables CHEP06, T.I.F.R. Mumbai, February 2006 J. Apostolakis, I. MacLaren, J. Apostolakis, I. MacLaren, P. Mendez.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
1 Calice UK Meeting 27/03/07David Ward Plans; timescales for having analysis results for LCWS Status of current MC/data reconstruction Reconstruction status;
BES III Computing at The University of Minnesota Dr. Alexander Scott.
Status of MAPS Geometry Simulation Yoshinari Mikami University of Birmingham 21 th April 2006 MAPS Meeting at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
LHCb production experience with Geant4 LCG Applications Area Meeting October F.Ranjard/ CERN.
Cluster finding in CALICE calorimeters Chris Ainsley University of Cambridge, UK LCWS 04: Simulation (reconstruction) parallel session 20 April 2004, Paris,
UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation Jae Yu * UTA DoE Site Visit Nov. 13, 2003 (*On behalf of the UTA team; A. Brandt, K. De, S. Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee,
Nigel Watson / BirminghamCALICE ECAL, UCL, 06-Mar-2006 Test Beam Task List - ECAL  Aim:  Identify all tasks essential for run and analysis of beam data.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
TB1: Data analysis Antonio Bulgheroni on behalf of the TB24 team.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
CALICE ScECAL software development S. Uozumi Sep-3 rd 2010 Japan-Korea joint workshop.
TB model improvements in Mokka and status of MC production Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London.
Simulation of the CALICE Test Beams with MOKKA Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London.
Plans for a Simulation Study of the Magnetic Field Requirements of the LC TPC February 2006, ILC TPC Analysis Jamboree, DESY Christian Hansen University.
Mokka, main guidelines and future P. Mora de Freitas Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole polytechnique - France Linear collider Workshop 2004, Paris.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Longitudinal shower profile - CERN electron runs Valeria Bartsch University College London.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
The Prototype Simulation of SDHCAL Ran.Han Gerald.Grenier Muriel.Donckt IPNL.
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
ECAL Alignment with e and π data D. BOUMEDIENE LPC Clermont-Ferrand CALICE meeting – Argonne 19/03/2008.
Whizard2 test at KEK report of work in progress Akiya Miyamoto 27 October 2015 Contents: Comparison with DBD sample Recoil mass distribution of e + e -
9 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey1 Tracking software status Paul Dauncey.
CMOS Pixels Sensor Simulation Preliminary Results and Plans M. Battaglia UC Berkeley and LBNL Thanks to A. Raspereza, D. Contarato, F. Gaede, A. Besson,
1 Calice TB Review DESY 15/6/06D.R. Ward David Ward Post mortem on May’06 DESY running. What’s still needed for DESY analysis? What’s needed for CERN data.
DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.
ECAL Interaction layer PFA Template Track/CalCluster Association Track extrapolation Mip finding Shower interaction point Shower cluster pointing Shower.
A Study on Leakage and Energy Resolution
1 MC Production and Reconstruction Summary and Plans Valeria Bartsch, Fabrizio Salvatore, A.-M. Magnan, and Nigel Watson.
Simulation Tools for Test Beam
Geant4-based Simulation Status and Plans
Hadronic Shower Structure in WHCAL Prototype
DESY TB05: Drift Chambers simulation
Mokka vs. LCDG4 Comparison
longitudinal shower profile
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Test Beam models in Mokka
Presentation transcript:

MC simulation of test beam events Fabrizio Salvatore (RHUL)

2 Simulation of Desy tb events - I First attempt to simulate MC events in test beam mode (Desy06 test beam) at three different institutions: RHUL, Bham, Manc. Use same version of Mokka (v06-01) and same version of packages against which Mokka is linked: Geant4 8.0.p01 CLHEP Note: use same versions of g++ compiler (gcc 3.2.3), but different updates RHUL: ; Bham: ; Man: /56 LCIO v01-07 Gear GSL 1.7

3 Simulation of Desy tb events - II Small modification needed in Geant4 and in Mokka/Kernel in order to define initial seeds used by the random numbers generator (David Bailey): G4: in source/intercoms/include/G4UIcommand.hh Mokka: Added class G4UIcmdWithVariableIntList defined in Kernel/src/G4UIcmdWithVariableIntList.cc In src/ControlMessenger.cc: //Random number commands _randomSeedsCommand = new G4UIcmdWithVariableIntList("/Mokka/init/RandomNumberSeeds",this); _randomSeedsCommand->SetGuidance("List of integer seeds to be passed to the random number generator."); _randomSeedsCommand->AvailableForStates(G4State_PreInit); G4int DoIt(G4String parameterList); virtual G4int DoIt(G4String parameterList);

4 Simulation of Desy tb events - III Generate 10K 1GeV electron events using TBDesy0506, at normal incidence Use same initial random numbers seeds Use caliceMarlin to extract distribution of variables related to ECAL and tracking to compare the events (lcio output) generated in the three different sites (thanks to Michele and David W. for the help on setting up caliceMarlin) Plot variable distribution and ratio of variable_at_site_i – variable_at_site_ j variable_at_site_i

5 N(hits) vs Plane RHUL Man RHUL Bham Man Bham

6 Energy vs Plane RHUL Man RHUL Bham Man Bham

7 N(hits) vs i ECAL RHUL Man RHUL Bham Man Bham

8 N(hits) vs j ECAL RHUL Man RHUL Bham Man Bham

9 r(hit) and E(hit/mips) RHUL Man RHUL Bham Man Bham RHUL Man Bham RHUL Bham Man Bham

10 Summary - I Full comparison plots available at: Although same versions of all programs and same initial seeds for the random numbers generator are used, resulting MC events are not exactly the same (as one would expect) Differences in the distributions of several kinematic variables are almost all within statistical uncertainties No big systematic bias is clearly visible

11 Summary - II Modified code to handle random number seeds not yet in official Mokka release Modification in Geant4 needs to be included in standard G4 release Need to setup a strategy for future massive MC production Compile executable at one single site and distribute the executable to all institutes involved in MC production Use different executables and quote differences as systematic effect on results