A Rotary Motor Drives Flavobacterium Gliding

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Advertisements

Michael W.H. Kirkness, Nancy R. Forde  Biophysical Journal 
Cortical Microtubule Contacts Position the Spindle in C
Wei-Hsiang Lin, Edo Kussell  Current Biology 
Flying Drosophila Orient to Sky Polarization
A Sparse Object Coding Scheme in Area V4
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Janet H. Iwasa, R. Dyche Mullins  Current Biology 
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Motor Networks: Shifting Coalitions
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Benjamin Thompson, Behzad Mansouri, Lisa Koski, Robert F. Hess 
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Gamma and the Coordination of Spiking Activity in Early Visual Cortex
Inversely Active Striatal Projection Neurons and Interneurons Selectively Delimit Useful Behavioral Sequences  Nuné Martiros, Alexandra A. Burgess, Ann.
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Target Detection Is Enhanced by Polarization Vision in a Fiddler Crab
A Programmable Optical Angle Clamp for Rotary Molecular Motors
Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Roop Mallik, Dmitri Petrov, S.A. Lex, S.J. King, S.P. Gross 
Guifen Chen, Daniel Manson, Francesca Cacucci, Thomas Joseph Wills 
The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation  Joshua B. Julian, Jack Ryan, Roy H. Hamilton,
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Ambarish Kunwar, Michael Vershinin, Jing Xu, Steven P. Gross 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Gal Ribak, Moshe Gish, Daniel Weihs, Moshe Inbar  Current Biology 
Bacterial Gliding Motility: Rolling Out a Consensus Model
Sensory Convergence Solves a Motion Ambiguity Problem
Martin Clausen, Michael Koomey, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Peng Zhang, Min Bao, Miyoung Kwon, Sheng He, Stephen A. Engel 
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Attention Reorients Periodically
Dario Maschi, Vitaly A. Klyachko  Neuron 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Bacteria that Glide with Helical Tracks
Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Motility at High Pressure
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Visually Mediated Motor Planning in the Escape Response of Drosophila
Locomotion Controls Spatial Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex
Fruit-Catching Fish Tune Their Fast Starts to Compensate for Drift
Nobuhiko Watari, Ronald G. Larson  Biophysical Journal 
Goal-Driven Behavioral Adaptations in Gap-Climbing Drosophila
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics
Control of the Initiation and Termination of Kinesin-1-Driven Transport by Myosin-Ic and Nonmuscle Tropomyosin  Betsy B. McIntosh, Erika L.F. Holzbaur,
Cell Division: The Need for Speed
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
James N. Ingram, Ian S. Howard, J. Randall Flanagan, Daniel M. Wolpert 
Joshua S. Weinger, Minhua Qiu, Ge Yang, Tarun M. Kapoor 
Michael W.H. Kirkness, Nancy R. Forde  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (April 2011)
Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale
Martin Müller, Rüdiger Wehner  Current Biology 
Roop Mallik, Dmitri Petrov, S.A. Lex, S.J. King, S.P. Gross 
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Presentation transcript:

A Rotary Motor Drives Flavobacterium Gliding Abhishek Shrivastava, Pushkar P. Lele, Howard C. Berg  Current Biology  Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 338-341 (February 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.045 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Evidence for a Rotary Motor (A) The F. johnsoniae adhesin SprB is present on the cell surface as ∼160-nm-long filaments. SprB was sheared off, and anti-SprB antibody was used to tether F. johnsoniae to a glass surface. (B) The trajectory of the center of mass of a tethered cell plotted over 1,000 frames, with the center of rotation plotted as a black circle. (C) The position of the center of rotation was averaged over 100 frames and plotted as black circles for a movie spanning 1,200 frames; the drift of the center of rotation shown with a dotted line was negligible (<5 nm). (D) Center of mass of a 0.5-μm polystyrene bead tethered onto a sheared cell was tracked over 2,192 frames. (E) Speed of rotation of the bead is plotted in gray, and average speed was calculated every ten frames and plotted in black. The time span was 35 s. Current Biology 2015 25, 338-341DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.045) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Speeds and Torques Recorded for 74 Tethered Cells (A) 92% of cells rotated counterclockwise and 8% rotated clockwise. Speed was calculated by recording cell rotation twice for 1-min periods. Average speed for each recording was calculated. Error bars represent SD in speed of the same cell between the two recordings. Changes in direction of rotation were not seen. (B) Frequency distribution of pivot position for 74 cells normalized for an average cell length of 6 μm. Most cells tethered at a distance of ∼1 μm from the cell pole. (C) Speeds ranged from 0.2–3 Hz, with a majority of cells rotating with a speed ∼1 Hz. (D) The torque varied from ∼200 to ∼6,000 pN nm, with the majority of cells at a torque ∼1,000 pN nm. For torque calculations, see Experimental Procedures. Current Biology 2015 25, 338-341DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.045) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Measured Speeds and Computed Torques for Cells in 0% and 8% Ficoll (A) Speed at 0% and 8% Ficoll. (B) The ratio of speeds at 8% and 0% Ficoll is close to 1. (C) Torque at 0% and 8% Ficoll. (D) The ratio of torques at 8% and 0% Ficoll approximates the ratio of viscosities, 3.91. Current Biology 2015 25, 338-341DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.045) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Flavobacterium Gliding Model A Flavobacterium cell with two gliding motors attached to a baseplate mounted on a looped track (bottom). Two SprB filaments are attached to the baseplate and move with it. If either of these filaments adheres to the substratum, the cell glides. Shearing shortens the filaments and disrupts the baseplate so that each filament is driven by a different motor. If one filament adheres to the substratum, the cell body spins about the axis of the motor. Current Biology 2015 25, 338-341DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.045) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions