IEP REPORT OF PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT K-12

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
WELLIGENT SPECIAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT plan TRAINING
EC Referrals Marsha Holleman/Nancy Simmons Jolee Harney/Jenny Kurzer.
The teacher of each classroom is responsible for evaluating the individual student's progress toward the AKS as described in the guidelines below. Kindergarten.
Connecticut State Department of Education
The Individualized Education Program (IEP) – Module #5 Requirements for LEAs Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Additional.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
IEP Amendment Podcast Script Shirley Young, Consultant, OSE-EIS January 13,
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Division of Special Education
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Inclusive Practices- Effective IEP Implementation Through Progress Monitoring Presented by Robin Brister West Carroll Parish
Title Grants Division Illinois State Board of Education 1 Navigating Rising Star for Title I District & Schoolwide Plans Dr. Lilibeth Gumia and Marie Nolen.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Planning Interview Process March 2011
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Documenting Ongoing ELD Progress Using the Secondary ELD Assessment REF Amaris Rivas Coordinator’s Meeting April 10, 2008.
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Fall  Please do not start screening children until they have had 2 weeks to adjust to being in Head Start/ Early Head Start  Screenings are to.
Student Information System Training New ESOL Data Fields February 21, 2013.
August ESE Meeting Housekeeping Items Teacher Expectations Referrals Private School/Home School Students 1.
Instructional Accommodations/ Modifications in Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Teacher Implementation Guide.
Federal Statute, Federal Regulations, State Policies, and State Procedures What’s the Difference? Mississippi Department of Education Office.
1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 Purpose: School Site Council The organization by which the school community comes together to chart the school’s path to improvement.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discipline.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
Section 504 training.
Post-Secondary Transition
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Third Party Billing for Service Coordinators
Parental Involvement Policy
Reporting Student Progress
2017 Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
School Site Council Training Roles and Responsibilities
School-Parent Compact
Educational Benefit Review
School-Parent Compact
Extended School Year 2017 Teacher Professional Development
TIMELINE DECISION TREE:
Monica Gordon: Principal Dawn Cowgill: Family School Liaison (FSL)
Document Custodian of the Drop Safe Log
Electronic Review Process
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
12/9/2018 Notice: An Overview The MDE released documentation and a new requirement last year for districts to utilized Notices to “finalize” IEPs rather.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Third Party Billing for Service Coordinators
Parental Involvement Policy
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Post-Secondary Transition
COED SLO Reporting.
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student Progress SBIEP Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student.
Grade 3 Reading Student Portfolio
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Grading Students with Disabilities
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
For Service Coordinators
Presentation transcript:

IEP REPORT OF PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT K-12 Los Angeles Unified School District Division of Special Education Compliance Department 2002 - 2003

Outcomes Participants will become familiar with: Memorandum No. H-15, IEP Report of Progress and Achievement, June 28, 2002 IEP Section G: Goals and Objectives This presentation is designed to discuss the new Memorandum H-15, IEP Report of Progress and Achievement. This memo explains the revision to the goal page and the marking procedures that became effective July 2002.

Previous Section G of IEP Reported Progress by Report Card Progress Report Parent Conference Other In order to understand the changes, let’s describe the way we used to report progress to parents. The previous Section G of the IEP reported progress by checking one or all of the methods noted on the screen.

Previous IEP Section G Did Not: Document Frequency of Reporting Document Progress toward Goal Mastery Frequency Progress But this previous method had some missing pieces. It did not document the frequency of reporting or indicate if progress was sufficient to lead to goal mastery. How

Page 5 …Revised IEP Section G So, the IEP Section G was revised to include: the frequency of reporting and if progress was sufficient to lead to goal mastery.

Memorandum H-15 IEP Report of Progress and Achievement Date: June 28, 2002 Office: Office of the Senior Deputy Superintendent, Educational Services Contact: Instructional Initiatives (213) 241-8051 As you view this presentation, you may wish to refer to Memo H-15. This memo was released June 28, 2002, from the Office of the Senior Deputy Superintendent, Educational Services. The contact is Instructional Initiatives. The new telephone number for that office is (213) 241-8051. This presentation will explain and clarify each section of this memo.

I. Background Parents of Disabled Students Receive Progress Reports: IDEA 1997 (Federal Register/Vol.64, No. 48, 300.347) Parents of Disabled Students Receive Progress Reports: At Least as Often as Parents of Non-disabled Children Documenting Progress toward IEP Goals Documenting if Progress Is Sufficient toward Goal Mastery As noted in Roman Numeral I, Background, IDEA 1997 clearly states that parents of disabled students should receive progress reports at least as often as parents of nondisabled students. These reports must document progress toward IEP goals, and indicate if that progress is sufficient to meet goal mastery. The new IEP Report of Progress and Achievement, found at the bottom of IEP section G, meets these three requirements.

II. PURPOSE Facilitate Reporting of Progress toward Goal Achievement As you see, Roman Numeral II states the purpose of this memo is to facilitate the reporting of progress toward goal achievement.

III. IEP REPORT OF PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT FROM CURRENT IEP Frequency -Three Times per Year – Elementary -Four Times per Year – Secondary Lack of Progress -Modify or Change Goals -Consider Program Change Roman Numeral III, explains that the report of progress toward IEP goals will be provided to parents at the same time that report cards are distributed at the school site. This means that for elementary students progress on IEP goals will be reported three times per year, and for secondary students, four times per year. Take a look at Attachment A of the memo. At the bottom of the page, you will see the four possible reporting period columns. For elementary students, you will only use the first three columns. For secondary students, all four columns will be used. The first time you report progress towards IEP goals, you will complete the first reporting period column of the form regardless of the report card cycle at the school. The second time you report progress, use the second reporting period column, regardless of the report card cycle at the school, and so on. If it appears that a student is not making sufficient progress toward goal mastery, first consider modifying or changing goals. Or, you may wish to consider whether the instructional program is meeting the student’s needs. In either case, you must convene an IEP meeting to address these issues.

IV. EXPLANATION OF MARKING TERMS Four-level Marking System Progress Sufficient to Meet Goal? “Yes” “No” (comment required) Goal Achievement Roman Numeral IV explains the marking terms. Turn to Attachment A and locate the “Explanation of Marks” section of the IEP report of progress. The first step in reporting progress is the use of the four level marking system. Reading from left to right, a mark of 4 indicates “Goal Met or Exceeded”, a mark of 3 indicates “Substantial Progress”, 2 indicates “Partial Progress” and 1 indicates “No Progress”. The second step in reporting progress is to address whether or not progress has been sufficient enough to meet the annual goal. You will check either “Yes” or “No”. Any “No” response requires a comment. Check the comment that best explains the lack of progress. For further details on marking procedures, refer to Part IV of the memo. The far right column “Goal Achievement” is completed at the next review IEP meeting. You will check either “Yes” or “No” to indicate whether or not each objective has been met. Any “no” response requires a explanation.

Example In the memo, Section IV, page 3, there is an example of marking procedures that describes the process from the first reporting period to the documentation of goal achievement.

V. IMPLEMENTATION When? Any IEP written after July 1, 2002 When do you begin to use the revised IEP Report of Progress and Achievement? You begin to use the IEP Report of Progress at the reporting period which occurs after the IEP has been written using the new goal page. Memo H-15 states that all IEPs written after July 1, 2002 are to use the revised Goal page.

V. IMPLEMENTATION (cont.) IEP Meeting Explain to Parent/Guardian Make 2 or 3 Copies of each Goal Page Marking Procedures On-going Record of Progress Copies to Parent/Guardian When you begin to use this form at the IEP meeting, be sure to explain this new reporting of progress procedure to the parent or guardian. At the conclusion of the IEP meeting the schools using NCR goal pages will: Make two copies of each goal page Give the first copy to the parent in place of the yellow copy. Use the second copy to replace the NCR goal pages and file this second copy as part of the IEP in the Green Folder. Each school site will establish a procedure for maintaining the goal pages on file. For example, the school may have all NCR goal pages centrally filed in color coded folders for each teacher and service provider. This will allow for easy access of folders for progress reporting updates. At each reporting period, the teacher or service provider will be responsible for filling out the Report of Progress. The teacher or service provider will mark the progress on the original white page of the NCR packet. The appropriate NCR copy will be sent home to parents. This process will ensure an ongoing record of progress throughout all reporting periods. If the computerized IEP format has been used, at the conclusion of the IEP meeting the school will: Make 3 copies of each goal page As before, the first copy is given to the parent The second copy is filed as part of the IEP in the Green Folder. The third copy is placed in a folder so that all service providers will have access to the goals for which they are responsible. This third copy will be used to mark progress at each reporting period and xeroxed copy is to be sent to the parents. This copy will serve as an ongoing record of progress throughout all reporting periods.

At the End of the Academic Year Place On-going Updated Copy of Report of Progress Form in Green Folder At the end of the academic year, ongoing report of progress page(s) will be filed with the IEP in the green folder. When the new school year begins, the ongoing report of progress pages will be used to continue marking progress until the next IEP review meeting.

Be Sure to Find Out the System in Place at Your School Make sure you are familiar with the system in place at your school.

return Make sure you are familiar with the system in place at your school.