JROTC and Regular Army Accessions 12 March BDE Chief & DAI Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
21st Space Wing Peterson AFB, CO FY06 Economic Impact for Colorado Springs and El Paso County Annual as of 30 Sep 2006 Prepared by: 21 st Comptroller.
Advertisements

Overview of Performance Funding Model for Ohio’s Community Colleges
OUSD Personnel and Readiness Overview Senior Military Colleges September 26, 2011.
Confidential to CPS. Not for distribution. Service Leadership Education: Building Tomorrow’s Leaders - Today March 2012 Todd Connor, Executive Director.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends Million Reasons to be Proud of Texas (among a few more) Demographic Highlights TEXAS is: big. The population.
Expanding the Pool of Qualified Teachers for Ohio Schools: A Program for Transitioning Military Personnel into the Teaching Profession.
Assessing Army Deployments to OEF/OIF Tim Bonds Dave Baiocchi September 2009.
by Steve H. Murdock Department of Rural Sociology
Demographic Trends and the Education Pipeline: Implications for Educating Latinos for the Future of America.
What does PIC stand for?. The Post-Secondary Schooling and Labor Market Experiences of Class of 2003 Boston Public High School Graduates at the Time of.
Changing Demographics in Texas
Promoting the Economic and Social Vitality of Rural America: The Demographic Context Rural Education Conference New Orleans, LA April 14, 2003 by Dr. Daryl.
Demographic Trends and Missouri’s Children Missouri State Board of Education April 21, 2005 Dr. Bill Elder University of Missouri-Columbia Office of Social.
Working Group D Day 2. How do we accomplish the remaining mission? Identify the mission * Communication is key with all agencies * USARECs mission/Cadet.
Military Options. Reasons Attracted to Military Travel Need for Employment A sense of civic duty and service for our country Family Tradition Occupational.
Racial and Economic Segregation in Schools: Barrier to Quality and Equality in Education Baris Gumus-Dawes.
Cohort Graduation and Annual Dropout Rates: 2014 Statewide Results and Highlights of Worcester Public Schools College and Career Readiness Webinar Series.
Presented to the Board of Trustees Davis Demographics & Planning, Inc. Riverside, California February 10 th, 2009 Upland Unified School District.
The Canadian Occupational Projection System Gilles Bérubé Labour Market Research and Forecasting Division Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.
Who Will Teach? Experience Matters Between 2004 and 2008, 300,000 veteran teachers left the workforce for retirement. See the Shifts in the Age of the.
The Long Term Labor Market and Fiscal Consequences of Dropping Out of High School in Pennsylvania Paul E. Harrington Center for Labor Market Studies Northeastern.
1 Note: Google translate based translation The Millennium Development Goals in the Republic of Moldova.
Student Affairs Committee University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Board of Governors State University System of Florida August 9,
Military Enlistment Standards Dr. Jane M. Arabian, Assistant Director Accession Policy Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness)
+ Planning for Your Future College life beyond Rainier Schools.
Revised September, The Navy Recruiting Organization 50 States, Europe, and Asia Two Regions, 26 Districts, 1,400 Stations, 65 MEPS, NORU, and.
+ Planning for Your Future College life beyond Rainier Schools.
Post Secondary Options Planting the seeds of choice for life beyond high school…
Moving the Needle on Access and Success Presentation to 2006 SHEEO/NCES Network Conference and IPEDS Workshop May 9, 2006 Washington, DC Cheryl D. Blanco.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
* Includes Marine Corps Active Duty Demographic Profile Assigned Strength, Gender, Race, Marital, Education and Age Profile of Active Duty Force September.
October 13, 2015 Understanding TAACCCT Performance Metrics.
* Includes Marine Corps Active Duty Demographic Profile Assigned Strength, Gender, Race, Marital, Education and Age Profile of Active Duty Force September.
Median Earnings and Tax Payments of Full-Time Year-Round Workers Ages 25 and Older, by Education Level, 2011 FIGURE 1.1 Page 11 SOURCES: U.S. Census Bureau,
Split Option Enlistment to Early Commissioning Program Officer
UNITED STATES ARMY CADET COMMAND RC SCHOLARSHIPS PROGRAM MANAGER
What is the Right Type of Loan
National Association of Governmental Labor Officials
League of AZ Cities and Towns PSPRS Pension Task Force August 15, 2014
Patient Registries and Health Outcomes in Diabetes: A Retrospective Study Nipa Shah, MD1; Fern Webb, PhD1; Liane Hannah, BSH1; Carmen Smotherman, MS2;
Becoming a Military Officer (Service Academies, ROTC, OCS)
Element #2 RESERVE AFFILIATION AND RESERVE COMPONENT COUNSELOURS AT INSTALLATIONS.
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS
Neighborhood Pedestrian Fatality Risk
Southern Bank Allegations of both adverse impact and adverse treatment in the involuntary layoffs of bank employees.
College Student and Non-College Student Poverty in San Marcos, Texas
OSU AROTC Program Benefits Building the future of the Army today!
Trends for 2018 The Lawlor Group.
Workforce Conditions for Veterans in Maine
Laura Wolf-Powers Josh Warner Shiva Kooragayala
WICHE Region 2017 Benchmarks: WICHE Region 2017 presents information on the West’s progress in improving access to, success in, and financing of higher.
Career Outcomes for Higher Education Graduates
Unemployment Rate Measuring the Workforce
Access Center Assessment Report
T24 Pathways Today we are discussing your T24 options after high school. Your options after high school include: Work force Apprenticeship Trade School.
The Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics CAPMAS
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
College.
Mark Fermanich, CU-Denver January 3, 2011
Solving the Surveyor’s Dilemma: Estimating Future Outcomes from Innovation Programs – the case of the Air Force and Navy SBIR/STTR programs Robin Gaster.
CHALLENGES FACED BY COUNTRIES TO FULFILL THE INTERNATIONAL COLLECTION OF VITAL STATISTICS DEMOGRAPHIC YEARBOOK (Session 14) Presentation to the Workshop.
Planning Reserve Margin
Southern Bank Allegations of both adverse impact and adverse treatment in the involuntary layoffs of bank employees.
Considering Colleges Out-of-State Presented by: RACC
Economic Dislocation and Landscapes of Despair: Rural-Urban & Within-Rural Differences in Non-Hispanic White Premature Mortality Shannon M. Monnat Lerner.
Texas Education Agency Standards and Engagement Performance Reporting
Texas Education Agency Standards and Engagement Performance Reporting
Academic Advising.
Accountability Presentation
Population Data
Presentation transcript:

JROTC and Regular Army Accessions 12 March 2019 BDE Chief & DAI Workshop

JROTC Impacts Location of JROTC Programs Percentage of Schools with JROTC Programs Regular Army (RA) Enlistments 21% No JROTC 89% JROTC 11% No JROTC 54% 13% Service Percentage Schools Army 5% 1.7K Air Force 3% ~900 Marines 1% ~250 Navy 2% ~600 Total 11% ~3.5K 9% 3% Legend Army JROTC School Air Force JROTC School Marines JROTC School Navy JROTC School JROTC program presence in a High School significantly increases RA enlistments 11% (3.5K) of High Schools have JROTC programs All Service JROTC schools account for 46% of RA enlistments among high school graduates Students at schools offering JROTC are twice as likely to enlist in the RA than students at schools without JROTC** Enlistment Rate Per 1,000 Seniors* 9.5 18.4 20.9 No JROTC Other Service JROTC Army JROTC *Officer accessions programs not included **Findings reviewed by analysts from USAREC and HRC Students at Schools Offering JROTC are over 2x as Likely to Enlist

Revision of the “Question” OLD QUESTION: What “lift” do we get from participation in JROTC? Extremely difficult to answer this quantitatively – JROTC does not have an individual participant database Quantitatively estimated using AdvRank Rsn Code for JROTC participation ‘1’: Completed 1 or 2 years as a member of JROTC ‘2’: Completed 3 or more years as a member of JROTC ‘N’: Completed 2 or more years as a member of JROTC This excluded those with not “enough” JROTC participation for AdvRank AND those with “better” reasons for AdvRank (ie College hours) Some older studies (2005 and earlier) used NCES High School and Beyond datasets to determine participation in JROTC NEW QUESTION: What “lift” do we get from schools that have JROTC? This is a broader question that does not rely on knowledge of individual participation in JROTC Acknowledges that the existence of a JROTC program at the high school influences the rest of the student body that does not participate in the program

JROTC Army Enlistment ROI Methodology Accessions Datawarehouse (DWH) Schools Reference Table Containing All 3 Code Sets Single File for Schools containing: HS Senior Enrollments, US Army Enlistments, and JROTC Identifier Education History DWH School Code FY16-18 Grad Enlistments Schools Nat’l Center for Education Statistics (NCES) NCESSchool Code 2016 Directory/Enrollments (Public & Private) Aggregate Enrollments and Enlistments by JROTC Type 𝑃𝑒𝑛𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒= ( 𝐸𝑛𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 3 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 ) 𝐸𝑛𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 ∗1000 Service Data Provided to USACC Army Navy Air Force Marine Corps JROTC School Code Sep ‘18 All-Service JROTC Program Locations (Annual Enlistments per 1000 Seniors)

USAREC/HRC Peer Analyst Review Conducted 16 Jan 2019 Reviewed and approved Methodology Discussion of Accessions vs Contracts; USAREC expressed desire to continue to use contract data, group concurred Discussion and adjustment to inclusion criteria Initial analysis required a high school graduation date in the file; led to large data loss (~32k records, ~16%) from the analysis up front Revised criteria to last High School attended Now ~13k RA enlistments are not included (~7%) Most not included have education higher than HS; include college attended rather than HS

Adjusted Summary Output (Inclusion based on last HS Attended) Number of Schools JROTC SVC HS SRS Total Enlistments Total Army PenRate RA Enlistments RA PenRate USAR Enlistments USAR PenRate ARNG Enlistments ARNG PenRate 1703 Army 473,961 58,402 41.1 37,280 26.2 6,280 4.4 14,842 10.4 892 Air Force 323,270 33,607 34.7 22,196 22.9 3,426 3.5 7,985 8.2 266 Marines 92,151 8,977 32.5 5,898 21.3 3.2 2,187 7.9 612 Navy 216,821 22,437 34.5 15,289 23.5 2,245 4,093 7.5 30810 No JROTC 2,681,729 172,303 21.4 97,706 12.1 18,085 2.2 56,512 7.0 Ratio of Army JROTC to No JROTC = 26.2/12.1 =2.17 Still “Twice As Likely” 10.1% of Schools have JROTC 45.2% of RA Enlistments come from schools with JROTC If we add in the 6,600 contracts not matched to NCES school to the “no JROTC” category, the % drops to 43.6%

Yeah, but…. Analysis still includes Private Schools …. And we know JROTC programs are more likely to be at public schools DoDEA Schools …. And we know that military kids go to those so they’re more pre-disposed to military service Alternative Schools/Juvenile Detention Centers, etc….And we know those kids are less likely to qualify for military service Small schools that wouldn’t qualify for JROTC programs …. So you’re padding the populations at non-JROTC schools to get lower penetration rates Career Centers …. So you’re counting JROTC contracts at schools that report 0 Seniors to pad the JROTC school contracts for higher penetration rates at JROTC schools

Adjusted Summary Output (Inclusion based on last HS Attended, Public Schools >20 Srs only) Number of Schools JROTC SVC HS SRS Total Enlistments Total Army PenRate RA Enlistments RA PenRate Ratio of JROTC to No JROTC 1631 Army 474,143 56,946 40.0 36,351 25.6 1.95 869 Air Force 322,868 33,366 34.4 22,044 22.8 1.74 252 Marines 92,106 8,705 31.5 5,741 20.8 1.58 597 Navy 22,247 34.2 15,149 23.3 1.78 15752 No JROTC 2,392,573 165,288 23.0 94,121 13.1 1.0 17.5% of Public Schools have JROTC 31.6% of HS Srs have access to JROTC 45.7% of RA Enlistments come from schools with JROTC The “Twice As Likely” insight holds true in the most restricted analysis 8.5% of Public Schools have Army JROTC 13.6% of HS Srs have access to Army JROTC 21.0% of RA Enlistments come from schools with JROTC

Next Steps Examine effects of attributes in addition to JROTC program: Distance to military installation Socio-economics (% on free/reduced lunch as proxy) Diversity of school population (% Minority) Distance to recruiting station Veteran population estimate for the school district Urbanicity (using Census Bureau “urban locale” code for the school) Include impact on ROTC Nat’l Scholarship Applications

Regular Army Contracts from Urban Locations

Impact in Urban Areas Urban Locale JROTC Svc HS Seniors Total Enlistments RA Enlistments Net RA Pen Rate RA Pen Rate (per 1000) Penetration Ratio Army JROTC/No JROTC City Army 192,360 20,734 12,996 14.85 22.52 2.21 Other Svc 201,241 20,010 13,404 22.20 No JROTC 634,172 32,415 19,402 10.20 Suburb 152,635 17,605 11,790 15.17 25.75 2.24 298,451 29,028 19,594 21.88 983,221 57,947 33,909 11.50 Town 44,359 6,849 4,226 20.11 31.76 1.83 48,993 5,970 3,834 26.09 No JROTC  291,707 28,272 15,173 17.34 Rural 84,789 11,758 7,347 20.00 28.88 1.70 83,197 9,310 6,102 24.45 483,473 46,654 25,637 17.68 Next step: Regional / Focus Market level analysis

Discussion