Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Crystal Structures of Sirt3 Complexes with 4′-Bromo-Resveratrol Reveal Binding Sites and Inhibition Mechanism  Giang Thi Tuyet Nguyen, Melanie Gertz,
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Crystal Structure of Human Nicotinamide Riboside Kinase
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Xuewu Zhang, Jodi Gureasko, Kui Shen, Philip A. Cole, John Kuriyan 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Substrate Recognition Mechanism of Atypical Protein Kinase Cs Revealed by the Structure of PKCι in Complex with a Substrate Peptide from Par-3  Chihao.
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e5 (January 2019)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (August 2005)
Seisuke Yamashita, Kozo Tomita  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Crystal Structure of Full-Length Apaf-1: How the Death Signal Is Relayed in the Mitochondrial Pathway of Apoptosis  Thomas Frank Reubold, Sabine Wohlgemuth,
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Partial Agonists Activate PPARγ Using a Helix 12 Independent Mechanism
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e7 (January 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
The Active Conformation of the PAK1 Kinase Domain
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Active and Inactive Protein Kinases: Structural Basis for Regulation
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Active and Inactive Protein Kinases: Structural Basis for Regulation
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Structural Basis for Kinase-Mediated Macrolide Antibiotic Resistance
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Dian Ding, Mengmeng Wang, Jing-Xiang Wu, Yunlu Kang, Lei Chen 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 1788-1795 (October 2012) The CDK9 Tail Determines the Reaction Pathway of Positive Transcription Elongation Factor b  Sonja Baumli, Alison J. Hole, Lan-Zhen Wang, Martin E.M. Noble, Jane A. Endicott  Structure  Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 1788-1795 (October 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2012.08.011 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2012 20, 1788-1795DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.08.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The C Terminus of CDK9 Influences Kinase Activity (A) Sequence alignment of the C-terminal region of CDK9. Identical residues are highlighted in green, and chemically equivalent residues are in yellow. The location of the most C-terminal CDK9 α helix is shown above the alignment. The constructs used in (B) and (C) are identified below the alignment. (B) Activity of CDK9FL/cyclin T and CDK9330/cyclin T assayed in the presence of increasing amounts of ATP. (C) Activity of various CDK9/cyclin T complexes with increasing concentrations of GST-CTD. CDK9 variants are labeled as shown in (A). All measurements were done in triplicate and reproduced in independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard errors (SEs). For a summary of the apparent kinetic parameters, see Table S1. See also Figure S1. Structure 2012 20, 1788-1795DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.08.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The CDK9 Tail Is Required for the Ordered Substrate Addition Catalytic Mechanism (A) Theoretical model curves for mixed and competitive inhibition assuming the same KM, Ki, and Vmax in both cases. (B) Activity of CDK9FL/cyclin T in the absence and presence of 2.5 μM ADP, in the presence of 100 μM ATP and increasing amounts of CTD. (C) Activity of CDK9FL/cyclin T in the absence and presence of 2.5 μM ADP, in the presence of 36 μM CTD and increasing amounts of ATP. (D) Activity of CDK9330/cyclin T in the absence and presence of 2.5 μM ADP, in the presence of 100 μM ATP and increasing amounts of CTD. All measurements were done in triplicate and reproduced in independent experiments. Error bars in (B)–(D) represent SEs. See also Figure S3. Structure 2012 20, 1788-1795DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.08.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structure of the CDK9 C-Terminal Tail (A) The final electron density map corresponding to additional C-terminal residues present in CDK9FL bound to cyclin T259 in the absence of DRB or AMPPNP is shown as a blue mesh at a contour level of 1σ. The difference density is shown as a green mesh at a contour level of 3σ. The CDK9 core structure is displayed as a solvent-accessible surface representation in gray. (B) Same view as in (A) to show the electron density corresponding to the CDK9 C-terminal sequence present in the structure of CDK9FL/cyclin T259 bound to DRB. The electron density map is drawn as a blue mesh and contoured at 1σ. (C) Detailed view of the interactions between the CDK9 C-terminal residues and the hinge sequence present in the CDK9FL/cyclin T259/DRB complex. The solvent-accessible surface of CDK9330 is drawn in gray and selected residues are labeled. The electron density map of the refined structure is drawn at a contour level of 1σ. (D) The difference density map corresponding to the DRB binding site in CDK9FL is shown at a contour level of 3σ. Residues of the CDK9FL hinge region (from Phe103 to Glu107) are also shown. (E) Interactions of Phe336 and Glu337 with the CDK9 hinge region. C-terminal residues that are identical across species are drawn as sticks in green, and equivalent residues are in yellow. CDK9/cyclin T259 (PDB 3BLH) bound to ATP is superposed in blue for comparison. See also Figure S4. Structure 2012 20, 1788-1795DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.08.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Flexibility of the CDK9 C Terminus Is Important for Kinase Activity (A) Activity of CDK9FL/cyclin T toward GST-CTD compared with complexes containing the CDK9 clamp mutants CDK9AA and CDK9DA, and the CDK9 truncation CDK9330. All measurements were done at 100 μM ATP and 24 μM GST-CTD in triplicate and reproduced in independent experiments. Error bars represent SEs. (B) Model showing that binding of a substrate peptide (lilac) is compatible with the bound conformation of the CDK9 C-terminal region. In this model, Ser2 of the heptad repeat occupies the phosphotransfer position. The cartoon-and-stick model is as described in Figure 3E. Structure 2012 20, 1788-1795DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.08.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Model of the CDK9 Catalytic Cycle (A) Model of the CDK9 conformational states adopted during the catalytic cycle. The cyclin subunit is omitted from the scheme for clarity. (I) Apo CDK9 has a flexible C-terminal tail. ATP is the first substrate bound to CDK9. (II) Upon ATP binding, the CDK9 C-terminal tail adopts an ordered structure, partially covering the ATP binding site. (III) The Pol II CTD binds to the CDK9/ATP complex to form a ternary complex that is competent for phosphotransfer. (IV) After phosphorylation, the CTD substrate is released. (V) ADP is released and the kinase returns to its apo state with a flexible C-terminal tail. (B) Reaction scheme. k1 and k-1 refer to the rate constants for ternary complex formation, and k2 is the rate constant governed by phosphotransfer and product release. Structure 2012 20, 1788-1795DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.08.011) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions