Planning & Budging Council

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ability-Based Education at Alverno College. Proposed Outcomes for Session 1. To introduce you to Alvernos approach to designing integrative general education.
Advertisements

I Love Outcomes (or at least not dread them so much) Reedley College Institutional Learning Outcomes Workshop January 8, 2009.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
General Education Models General Education Reform Committee Lloyd Duman Carol Lindsay Sherry Simkins Karen Ruppel Bob Vogeler Peter Zao Bob Murray.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Texas Christian University TAMU Assessment Conference 2011.
Program Level Outcomes Jessica Carpenter Elgin Community College.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
CCSS Implementation July 2010: State Board of Education adopts Common Core State Standards for English and Mathematics : Implementation of.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
SLOAC Committee Flex Day Working Session Date: Time: 12:45 – 2:15.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
LeMoyne-Owen College December 15, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Institutional Learning Outcomes Office of Institutional Effectiveness Presented to the Learning Assessment Task Force November 5, 2013.
Pilot Training for Volunteers General Education Assessment Committee.
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Literacy and Numeracy Benchmarks Prepared by SAPDC Learning Facilitator Team.
Which ICC Next? Part I. De Anza College provides an academically rich, multicultural learning environment that challenges students of every background.
Thinking Critically. Mission Statement Course Level SLOs and Assessments Program Level SLOs and Assessment s Assessing ICCs.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
National Educational Technology Standards For Students.
8/23/ th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA POGIL as a model for general education in chemistry Scott E. Van Bramer Widener University.
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
21st Century Skills in the Classroom
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
The General Education Core in CLAS
SLOs: What Are They? Information in this presentation comes from the Fundamentals of Assessment conference led by Dr. Amy Driscoll and sponsored by.
The Concept of INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Building Better Learning Outcomes
New Student Experience
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
Focus Areas Business and Applied Business Fine Arts, Design, and Media
Building Better Learning Outcomes
NJCU College of Education
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
Assessing Learning Outcomes
Mapping Outcomes it’s not so bad.
A new “pre-graduation expectation” for graduating seniors
Assessment and Accreditation
PART ONE: Assessing Institutional Learning Outcomes
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Creating an Interdisciplinary assessment activity Flex day 1/12/2017
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Institutional Learning Outcomes
Ways to link the course learning outcomes to the program learning outcome and to the Institutional learning outcomes.
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

Planning & Budging Council Institutional Learning Outcomes Examples from other Colleges Prepared by PRIE February 27, 2019

Summary of Findings Common Approaches: Ask faculty to map SLOs and PLOs to ILOs Identify course and program level assessments which would assess the ILO competency Establish rubrics for assessing how a course assignment is representative of ILO competency – Skyline Assess SLOs and PLOs that align with ILOs during a regular, intermittent cycle: Select programs to do it during the full program review cycle – Skyline (A sub-set of programs should do it across the campus (representative of the whole) - Laney Assess one ILO per year across courses - Laney Surveys Survey college graduates on ILO competencies only (self-assessment) – Foothill Use the CCSSE survey (every other year) – Skyline Survey, in addition to asking students to submit a sample paper (research paper), followed by focus groups – College of the Sequoias Some college have an Assessment Committee facilitating the entire process: (SLO, PLO, and ILO) – Laney, Foothill, DeAnza

CSM ILO’s Independent Learning and Development - The ability of students to develop, evaluate, and pursue personal, academic, and/or career goals. Students will be able to: Demonstrate effective study strategies; Articuluate realistic and achievable academic and/or career goals; Identify and make use of college and community resources (academic and student support services) Effective Communication - The ability of students to write, read, speak, and listen in order to communicate effectively. Students will be able to: Comprehend, interpret, and analyze written and oral information; Express ideas and provide supporting evidence effectively in writing and in speaking; Express ideas creatively through verbal and non-verbal media (e.g. music, art, dance, etc.) Communicate effectively in a group or team situation Quantitative Reasoning - The ability of students to perform quantitative analysis, using appropriate resources. Students will be able to: Solve a variety of problems that require quantitative reasoning; Interpret graphical representations of quantitative information Critical Thinking - The ability of students to think creatively, analytically, and logically, in order to assess ideas, formulate arguments, develop multiple perspectives, and solve problems. Students will be able to: Develop and evaluate arguments; Analyze, synthesize and evaluate ideas as part of the creative process; Assess the validity of both qualitative and quantitative evidence; Apply diverse disciplinary approaches and perspectives; Employ the scientific method Social Awareness and Diversity - The ability of students to recognize cultural traditions and to understand and appreciate the diversity of the human experience, past and present. Students will be able to: Identify the benefits of diversity and respect the range of diversity; Work effectively with others of diverse backgrounds; Recognize the importance and analyze the interconnectedness of global and local concerns, both past and present Identify and analyze a diversity of artistic and cultural traditions Ethical Responsibility/Effective Citizenship - The ability of students to make judgments with respect to individual conduct, based on systems of values. Students will be able to: Recognize ethical principles; Identify possible courses of action in response to ethical dilemmas and evaluate their consequences; Behave ethically and respectfully when working with students, instructors, and the campus community

CSM Assessment Method: ILO-specific flex day workshops every fall, there's an ILO workshop on flex day where a group of faculty take 3/6 ILOs and think of a way to assess it (this august, we made rubrics which are published on our SLO site).  every spring, there's a follow-up workshop (should be Jan, but this year it's march - also will be published on flex activity) where we discuss our assessment.  Embedded Learning Community activity Year One Promise & the other LCOMMS are going to hold focus groups around the ILOs. The assessment committee will be fashioning questions next week at our meeting. The activity will be held April 25 this year. Campus Climate & Satisfaction survey We will be adding this into our survey. Promoting interdisciplinary collaborations around shared ILOs ASGC will be reading all the program reviews, and one goal is to see what challenges faculty have in common. We will have a flex session, or brainstorm some sort of pedagogical intervention. Encourage disciplines to look at their own curriculum "maps" for Program Review If your courses/program supports ILOs, how well do you think you're doing? How well are students doing in their ILO-related work? What questions do you have? Prog Rev is a place to reflect on and report this. Communication How does everyone hear about this? In the First Great Annual Assessment Report! due to be published in May. This communicates Our Year In Student Learning. What we DON'T do: Using mapping to gauge ILOs. 

Skyline ILO’s Critical Thinking  Students will be able to demonstrate critical thinking skills in problem solving across the disciplines and in daily life. Effective Communication  Students will be able to communicate and comprehend effectively. Citizenship Students will be able to use knowledge acquired from their experiences at this college to be ethically responsible, culturally proficient citizens, informed and involved in civic affairs locally, nationally, and globally. Information Literacy  Students will be able to demonstrate skills central to information literacy. Lifelong Wellness Students will be able to demonstrate an understanding of lifelong wellness through physical fitness and personal development.

Skyline: Assessment Method The ISLOs are assessed with a direct and indirect measure. The direct measure involves the use of a common rubric (see below), which enables faculty to have a common language and criteria around assessment. Each of the ISLOs is scheduled to be assessed on a given semester, with one to two per academic year, until each of the five is assessed by faculty across the disciplines. Select faculty whose courses map up to the ISLO that is scheduled to be assessed that semester use the common rubric to evaluate students’ work within their disciplinary framework. The data resulting from the assessment is then analyzed and discussed by the Institutional Effectiveness Committee and departments as they complete their program review. A campus-wide forum is also held on an annual basis to discuss ISLO assessment results. The indirect measure is through the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE). The CCSSE is a tool used to measure how students perform on standards relative to student engagement. The data resulting from this assessment is then analyzed and discussed by the Institutional Effectiveness Committee. http://www.skylinecollege.edu/sloac/assets/islos/updating%20mapping%20to%20islos% 20matrix%20.pdf

DeAnza: Institutional Core Competencies Communication and Expression: Students will communicate clearly, express themselves creatively, interpret thoughtfully and logically, and engage actively in dialogue and discussion, while paying attention to audience, situation, and (inter) cultural context. Communication and expression may be written or oral, verbal or nonverbal, informational or artistic. Information Literacy: Students will recognize when information is needed and locate, critically evaluate, synthesize, and communicate information in various formats. They will use appropriate resources and technologies while understanding the social, legal, and ethical issues for information and its use. Physical/Mental Wellness and Personal Responsibility: Students will recognize lifestyles that promote physical and mental well-being, engage in self-reflection and ethical decision-making, explore career choices and life goals, practice effective individual and collaborative work habits, and demonstrate a commitment to ongoing learning. Civic Capacity for Global, Cultural, Social and Environmental Justice: Students will recognize their role as local, national, and global citizens. They will participate in a democratic process, respect social and cultural diversity, appreciate the complexity of the physical world, and understand the significance of both environmental sustainability and social justice. Critical Thinking: Students will analyze arguments, create and test models, solve problems, evaluate ideas, estimate and predict outcomes based on underlying principles relative to a particular discipline, interpret literary, artistic, and scientific works, utilize symbols and symbolic systems, apply qualitative and quantitative analysis, verify the reasonableness of conclusions, explore alternatives, empathize with differing perspectives, and adapt ideas and methods to new situations. 

DeAnza: Assessment Method(s) Each ICC assessed is conducted on multiple levels simultaneously, including: Assessment of SLO statements for relevant courses Campus-wide direct assessment tools and methods Other relevant assessments conducted within particular departments and programs

DeAnza: example of ICC mapped to PLOs

Foothill College: 4-C’s Skills include written and oral communication in English, mathematics, critical and analytical thinking, creativity, teamwork, responsibility, and other proficiencies. Foothill has defined four core competencies (4-Cs) as its Institutional Learning Outcomes: Communication Demonstrate analytical reading and writing skills including evaluation, synthesis, and research; deliver focused and coherent presentations; demonstrate active, discerning listening and speaking skills in lectures and discussions. Download the Communication Draft Rubric (pdf, 58KB) Computation Complex problem-solving skills, technology skills, computer proficiency, decision analysis (synthesis and evaluation), apply mathematical concepts and reasoning, and ability to analyze and use numerical data. Download the Computation Rubric (pdf, 52KB) Creative, Critical, and Analytical Thinking Judgment and decision making, intellectual curiosity, problem solving through analysis, synthesis and evaluation, creativity, aesthetic awareness, research method, identifying and responding to a variety of learning styles and strategies. Download the Critical Thinking Rubric (pdf, 58KB) Community/Global Consciousness and Responsibility Social perceptiveness, including respect, empathy, cultural awareness, and sensitivity, citizenship, ethics, interpersonal skills and personal integrity, community service, self-esteem, interest in and pursuit of lifelong learning. Download the Global Consciousness & Citizenship Rubric (pdf, 50KB) Learn more about the FRAMES and 4cs here.

Foothill: Assessment Method Foothill also administers an annual survey to allow students to self- assess their “Four C’s”: https://foothill.edu/staff/irs/ILO_Disaggregation.pdf

College of the Sequoias Strategy Plan   Choose ILO for Assessment O&A Committee decides Campus Campaign EVERYONE should know the ILO and work on the assessment. PR campaign, work with PIO, committee chairs, Senates, etc. Convocation announcement? Student Surveys Create student evaluations, work with Research office to disseminate and gather results. Faculty Focus Groups Convene faculty focus groups to read/analyze and respond to student surveys. TracDat mapping Create an ILO assessment report in TD—work with the TD Task Force. Need a group to analyze the map (O&A?). Division reports Work with IC. Create simple form for DCs to fill out about how well they meet the ILO. Gather and compile data. Final assessment report and improvement plan Write up the assessment report and improvement plan for the ILO.

Laney: Assessment Method – 1 ILO per year You will be doing one assessment that will count for both the course and the institution. Decide on the assignment and the assignment description/prompt that you will give your students. Discuss this with your colleagues that are teaching the same class. Create a rubric or scoring guide to evaluate student work or use one of the Communication Assessment rubrics. At some point during the semester, give the assignment and evaluate student work. Please submit three samples of student work.  We’d like to create a campus-wide portfolio of a variety of student work to showcase what Laney students are learning about the skills represented in ILO #1.    We also plan to post anonymous samples of student work to the Laney College website as evidence of our ILO #1 assessment.  The Learning Assessment Committee will provide permission forms so that you can easily obtain permission from your students to copy and use their work without their names. (The permission form can be found Here.)