CUTRIC: Specialized and Conventional Transit Integration Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Transit INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)
Advertisements

SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #2 August 6, 2014.
WELCOME Panhandle Independent Living Center’s Travel Training Partnership.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
University of Minho School of Engineering Centre Algoritmi Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de Engenharia - 24 a 27 de Outubro de 2011.
1 Mobility Management in Rural Environments October 21, :45 – 3:15 p.m.
Public Transportation & Persons With Special Transportation Needs House Transportation Committee February 12, 2013 Tom Hingson Transportation Services.
Together We Ride - Mobility Management Center for Santa Clara County Together We Ride.
HSTP PLAN DEVELOPMENT Skagit-Island Human Services Transportation Plan July 10, 2014.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
Demand Responsive Transport - an option for Patient and Community Transport.
TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSITION Oregon Youth Transition Conference February 19, 2015 Hood River, Oregon.
One Call Transportation Services One Call Transportation Services Building on a Network.
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Texas Transportation Works Summit Presenter: Maurice Pearl, Citibus, General Manager.
PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration Lecture 10c – Public Transportation and Aging.
Overview of the U.S. DOT Priority ITS Initiative Mobility Services for All Americans James A. Bunch Mitretek Systems APTA Bus and Paratransit Conference.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0765r0 July 2012 Carl Kain, Noblis, Inc.Slide 1 Dynamic Mobility Integrated Dynamic Transit Operations Use Case for ISD Date:
Copying distribution or use of the contents of this document is prohibited without written authorization from SafeHarbor Technology Corporation. Maximizing.
2008 National Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Nebraska Statewide Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan.
Ride in Kane Paratransit Service Kane County. Ride in Kane was established in 2008 through the efforts of the Kane County Paratransit Coordinating Counsel.
Brian Cronin Federal Transit Administration ITSA Annual Conference May 4, 2005 Mobility Services for All Americans (MSAA) Foundation Research and Next.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
Find-a-Ride Waukesha County! Connecting People, Transportation, and Health & Human Services.
Keeping Harris County Moving A Coordinated Approach.
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
E XPANDING M OBILITY O PTIONS IN M ARIN Marin Transit’s Paratransit and Mobility Management Programs 1.
Partnering with Clients & Paratransit Providers for Brokerage Success.
LogistiCare empowers passionate people to provide quality access to human and healthcare services through technology, innovation and community partnerships.
What is a “no-show”? Contact Us!
CUTA FACT BOOK WORKSHOP
Transportation and transition
5/11/2018 6:25 PM Toronto Transit Commission Microsoft Services Helps Deliver Enhanced Customer Service and Increased Efficiencies “Since the solution.
Rhode Island.
T-Share: A Large-Scale Dynamic Taxi Ridesharing Service
Comprehensive Operational Review Mid-Study Update Presentation
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Strategies to integrate third-party service providers
and Transportation Impacts
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
What is OCACCESS Online?
Strategies to integrate third-party service providers
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
Additional Trip Planning Prospects for GTFS Flex
Web Based Find-A-Ride Portal
Note: The screen settings are set to fit wide screen monitors.
Brian Ferris, Software Engineer
Industry Experience Sub-Group
Innovative Fare Programs for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
Promoting Shared Rides: Where do Transit Agencies Fit?
Microtransit Pilot In Sacramento
A statewide trip planner for Vermont Public Transit
Ride-hailing: Regulation & Collaboration
Technology In Action Session: An On-Demand Sunday Transit Application
Trip Planning Tools for Flexible Transit Services
Where’s My Ride William Tsuei Director of IT.
Introduction to Micro-Transit / Demand Responsive Transit
INNOVATIVE SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES
SiMobility Innovative technology that moves you.
United We Ride United We Ride….
Paratransit Update April 2019
Reasonable Modification
ADA Eligibility Process
Overview Welcome & Introductions MTM Overview
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
Mobility Management in Sacramento:
LogistiCare empowers passionate people to provide quality access to human and healthcare services through technology, innovation and community partnerships.
FREEdom and Volunteer Incentive Program (VIP)
GREAT TRANSIT RIDER EXPERIENCE
NADTC Course Session 3: Discovering Community Transportation Resources
The Nuts and Bolts of Rides to Wellness How do we make this happen
Presentation transcript:

CUTRIC: Specialized and Conventional Transit Integration Project Ontario Region 2017-2019

High Level Project Goals Identify trips currently served by specialized transit that could be served by conventional transit Identify opportunities where specialized transit can act as a feeder service to conventional transit for people with disabilities Identify low-occupancy conventional transit routes that could be converted from fixed-route service to flex- route service (Belleville Transit only for current project) High Level Project Goals

Integrating flexible and fixed schedules and fleets using technology

Background: Opportunities and Plans In 2011, the national [Canadian] average cost per passenger for specialized transit services was $25.75, as compared to a cost per passenger of $3.31 for conventional transit in the same year” (CUTA, 2012). Examples: Wheel-Trans’ ten-year plan submitted to the TTC in 2016 Region of Peel’s report on the challenges faced by their accessible transit service TransHelp, from changes to the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) Access-A-Ride for the MTA in New York City, started process recently to integrate paratransit with fixed transit: “By applying new technological systems to a 26 year-old mandate, paratransit services can be made more efficient and provide a better customer experience. In New York City, these upgrades could save the agency up to $133 million per year. Improving mobility solutions for the elderly and disabled is possible, necessary and urgent” Intelligent Paratransit Report MTA, 2016

Lessons learned from private non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) industry Pantonium works with private NEMT operators across North America Technology solution for NEMT must maximize efficiency of vehicles, handle mixed fleets and rider groups System needs to adapt plans to changes constantly throughout day (high cancellation rates, “will calls”, on-demand riders) Solution must be scalable, dispatch needs to occur autonomously, human intervention only for exception management

CUTRIC - Specialized and Conventional Transit Integration Project Timeline (2 years) Stage 1 - Assess existing demand, operations and client preferences (4 months) Stage 2 - Initial deployment/data gathering (6 months) Stage 3 - Develop alternative scenarios for integrating specialized transit with conventional transit and supporting policies (6 months) Stage 4 - Integration pilot (6 months) Stage 5 - Summary report (4 months) ELIGIBLE TRANSHELP RIDERS PUBLIC TRANSIT SCHEDULE (GTFS) Trips uploaded to Pantonium DYNAMIC ROUTE OPTIMIZATION SYSTEM TRANSHELP FLEET (DYNAMIC) PUBLIC TRANSIT FLEET (FIXED) Coordinated pick up / drop offs

THE SOLUTION Riders need transportation System communicates with vehicle based driver application Riders order, pay for & monitor trips from their phones, online portal, or via call center System dispatches & routes vehicles

Operational Example 606 Atwater to Square One on a Sunday Example. I live on Cawthra Rd. #8 does not run on sundays, looks like I have to walk to Hurontario which takes about 15 minutes. Now I am able bodied, and even I don’t like doing this, but imagine I have limited mobility… Now at this point I still want to go to the mall, I am eligible for TransHelp, I give them a call and they take me all the way to Square One. That probably cost TransHelp $30, but in reality I would be fine with taking the 19 to Square One, but I can’t walk it. In this case, the system would plan to pick me up at my house, and drop me off at the 19, it would consider when my appointment was and when the 19 would drop me off. On the return trip, it would consider when the 19 would drop me off at the closest bus stop and time a pickup from a TransHelp vehicle. In this way you fill in the cracks of accessibility for conventional transit by utilizing the flexibility of paratransit empowered to reduce costs with technology.

Project Partners Benefits and Value TransHelp: Integrate and coordinate specialized service with conventional transit in Peel to reduce trip costs, increase capacity Pantonium: Deploy licenses for optimized routing and dispatching software and in-kind time for project management CUTRIC: Provides access to provincial and federal funding University of Toronto and OCADU: Research real-life applications of policy and technology to the challenges of public transit, which will be publishable, they will leverage the project funds with NSERC grants Transit: Learn impacts of increased utilization of buses by disabled passengers, test actual impact during pilot, integrate first-last mile service into fixed route service

EXTRA SLIDES FOR REFERENCE

Two major North American systems, Toronto Transit Commission and Metropolitan Transit Agency (New York City’s transit provider) are also considering pilots for integrating their paratransit services. Reference slides http://www.ttc.ca/About_the_TTC/Commission_reports_and_information/Commission_meetings/2016/September_28/Reports/4_Wheel-Trans_10-Year_Strategy_-_September_2016_Update.pdf “By applying new technological systems to a 26 year-old mandate, paratransit services can be made more efficient and provide a better customer experience. In New York City, these upgrades could save the agency up to $133 million per year. Improving mobility solutions for the elderly and disabled is possible, necessary and urgent” http://www.pantonium.com/make-paratransit-great-again/ http://wagner.nyu.edu/rudincenter/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/INTELLIGENT_PARATRANSIT.pdf

Project Academic Team Breakdown U of T Team One, Dr. Amer Shalaby: Provide a study to indicate metrics required to be tracked for all stages of the project; provide assistance in gathering data during all stages including feedback from drivers and riders as non-partisan stakeholder;  provide analysis means and methods to evaluate suitability for route integration for regional transportation providers. U of T Team Two, Dr. Chris Beck and Dr. Dionne Aleman: Provide data models to be used for testing of on demand simulation; examine how schedules for flexible trips could be optimized to maximize transit agency efficiency; provide analysis of data for summary report. OCADU Team, Dr. Steve Szigeti: Provide browser based visualisation overlays for Pantonium system based on user generated reports from data pulled out of system. Potential reports include: heat maps for rider demand, mapping and tracking routes driven, origins and destinations, on time and late comparisons, vehicle locations, other relevant operational statistics.