Hess Cognitive Rigor Writing Matrix

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Advertisements

ALIGNING THE INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM TO THE CA CCSS Common Core State Standards Symposium for Special Educators Kevin Schaefer Senior Program.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Please print the three Cognitive Rigor Matrices full page. Thanks!
With Karen Kruger February 13, 2013 Higher Order Thinking.
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Standards Academy Grades 3 and 4 Day 1. Objectives Understand the Critical Areas of our grade levels. Examine the importance of vertical alignment across.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
ELA Learning Progressions
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
SLB /04/07 Thinking and Communicating “The Spiritual Life is Thinking!” (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Depth of Knowledge and Cognitive Demand QualityCore Professional Development Day 1, 2–1.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Teachers Helping Teachers Align Units with the Common Core/ Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy September 24, 2012 Presented by Elin Reuben Karma.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
Differentiation for Special Education in a Common Core World Dr. Gail Angus Riverside County SELPA.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Especially at the onset or height of a fever. a sudden feeling of cold with shivering accompanied by a rise in temperature, often with copious sweating,
Argumentative Writing Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
And PARCC
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Are your students thinking more deeply or just working harder
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Bridging Assessment and Instruction
Dr Anie Attan 26 April 2017 Language Academy UTMJB
Assessment.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Middle School English Language Arts Learning Targets: I can…
We Give a H.O.O.T. About Writing!
Assessment.
Narrative Writing Assessment Targets
Definitions & Examples
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
Advanced English 6 November 1-2, 2017
Learning Progressions Hillsboro School District
About This Document The Cognitive Rigor (CR) Matrix (created by Karin Hess by combining Bloom’s Taxonomy and Webb’s Depth of Knowledge) is the primary.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Preparation for the American Literature Eoc
Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان إعداد
When It Rains Rigor The puddles are deeper!
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels
Writing Learning Outcomes
The tasks follow 4 pathways identified on the CR Matrix.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Advanced English 6 November 10, 14
Norman L Webb.
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Arroyo Valley High School August 19, 2013
Assessment and Higher-Order Thinking
Hess Cognitive Rigor Matrix
Presentation transcript:

Hess Cognitive Rigor Writing Matrix Webb’s  Depth of Knowledge DOK LEVEL 1 Recall and Reproduction DOK LEVEL 2 Basic Skills and Concepts DOK LEVEL 3 Strategic Thinking and Reasoning DOK LEVEL 4 Extended Thinking Blooms  Remember (Knowledge) Retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, recognize, recall, locate, identify. Knowledge/Remember   Ra. Complete short answer questions with facts, details, terms, principles, etc. (e.g., label parts of diagram) Hess Cognitive Rigor Writing Matrix Understand (Comprehend) Construct meaning, clarify, paraphrase, represent, translate, illustrate, give examples, classify, categorize, summarize, generalize, infer a logical conclusion), predict, compare/contrast, match like ideas, explain, construct models. Comprehend/Understand DOK1 Cb. Describe or define facts, details, terms, principles, etc. Cc. Select appropriate word/phrase to use when intended meaning/definition is clearly evident Cd. Write simple complete sentences Ce. Add an appropriate caption to a photo or illustration Cf.. Write “fact statements” on a topic (e.g., spiders build webs) Comprehend/Understand DOK2 Ci. Specify, explain, show relationships; explain why, cause-effect Cj. Provide and explain non-examples and examples Ck. Take notes; organize ideas/data (e.g., relevance, trends, perspectives) Cl. Summarize results, key concepts, ideas Cm. Explain central ideas or accurate generalizations of texts or topics Cn. Describe steps in a process (e.g., science procedure, how to and why control variables) Comprehend/Understand DOK3 Cy. Write a multi-paragraph composition for specific purpose, focus, voice, tone, & audience Cz. Develop and explain opposing perspectives or connect ideas, principles, or concepts using supporting evidence (quote, example, text reference, etc.) CA.. Develop arguments of fact (e.g., Are these criticisms supported by the historical facts? Is this claim or equation true?) Comprehend/Understand DOK4 CR. Use multiple sources to elaborate on how concepts or ideas specifically draw from other content domains or differing concepts (e.g., research paper, arguments of policy – should this law be passed? What will be the impact of this change?) CS. Develop generalizations about the results obtained or strategies used and apply them to a Apply Carry out or use a procedure in a given situation; carry out (apply to a familiar task), or use (apply) to an unfamiliar task. Application DOK 1 APg. Apply rules or use resources to edit specific spelling, grammar, punctuation, conventions, or word use APh. Apply basic formats for documenting sources Application DOK 2 APo. Use context to identify/infer the intended meaning of words/phrases APp. Obtain, interpret, & explain information using text features (table, diagram, etc.) APq. Develop a (brief) text that may be limited to one paragraph, précis APr. Apply basic organizational structures (paragraph, sentence types, topic sentence, introduction, etc.) in writing Application DOK 3 APB. Revise final draft for meaning, progression of ideas, or logic chain APC. Apply internal consistency of text organization and structure to a full composition or oral communication APD. Apply a concept in a new context APE. Apply word choice, point of view, style, rhetorical devices to impact readers’ interpretation of a text Application DOK 4 APT. Select or devise an approach among many alternatives to research and present a novel problem or issue APU. Illustrate how multiple themes (historical, geographic, social) may be interrelated within a text or topic Analyze Break into constituent parts, determine how parts relate, differentiate between relevant-irrelevant, distinguish, focus, select, organize, outline, find coherence, deconstruct (e.g., for bias or point of view). Analyze DOK 1 ANs. Decide which text structure is appropriate to audience and purpose (e.g., compare/contrast, proposition-support) Ant. Determine appropriate, relevant key words for conducting an Internet search or researching a topic Analyze DOK 2 ANu. Compare/contrast perspectives, events, characters ANv. Analyze/revise format, organization, & internal text structure (signal words, transitions, semantic cues) of different print and non-print texts ANw. Distinguish: relevant-irrelevant information; fact/opinion (e.g., What are the characteristics of a hero’s journey?) ANx. Locate evidence that supports a perspective/differing perspectives Analyze DOK 3 ANF. Analyze interrelationships among concepts/ issues, problems in a text ANG. Analyze impact or use of author’s craft (literary devices, viewpoint, dialogue) in a single text ANH. Use reasoning and evidence to generate criteria for making and supporting an argument of judgment (Was FDR a great president? Who was the greatest ball player?) ANI. Support conclusions with evidence Analyze DOK 4 ANV. Analyze multiple sources of evidence, or multiple works by the same author, or across genres, or time periods AVW. Analyze complex/abstract themes, perspectives, concepts ANX Gather, analyze, and organize multiple information sources AVY. Compare and contrast conflicting judgments or policies (e.g., Supreme Court decisions) Evaluate Make judgments based on criteria, check, detect inconsistencies or fallacies, judge, critique. Evaluate DOK 3 EVJ. Evaluate validity and relevance of evidence used to develop an argument or support a perspective EVK. Describe, compare, and contrast solution methods EVL. Verify or critique the accuracy, logic, and reasonableness of stated conclusions or assumptions Evaluate DOK 4 AVZ. Evaluate relevancy, accuracy, & completeness of information across multiple sources AVaa. . Apply understanding in a novel way, provide argument or justification for the application AVbb. Critique the historical impact (policy, writings, discoveries, etc.) Create (Synthesize) Reorganize elements into new patterns/structures, generate, hypothesize, design, plan, produce. Create/Synthesize DOK 1 SYM. Brainstorm facts, ideas, concepts, problems, or perspectives related to a topic, text, idea, issue, or concept Create/Synthesize DOK 2 SYN. Generate conjectures, hypotheses , or predictions based on facts, observations, evidence/observations, or prior knowledge and experience SYO. Generate believable “grounds” (reasons) for an opinion-argument Create/Synthesize DOK 3 SYP. Develop a complex model for a given situation or problem SYQ. Develop an alternative solution or perspective to one proposed (e.g., debate) Create/Synthesize DOK 4 SYcc. Synthesize information across multiple sources or texts in order to articulate a new voice, alternate theme, new knowledge or nuanced perspective