The Structure of Human Argonaute-2 in Complex with miR-20a

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
The Making of a Slicer: Activation of Human Argonaute-1
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor CAR
Multivalent Recruitment of Human Argonaute by GW182
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Ryan C. Wilson, Janice D. Pata  Molecular Cell 
Hybrid Structure of the RagA/C-Ragulator mTORC1 Activation Complex
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structural Basis for the EBA-175 Erythrocyte Invasion Pathway of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum  Niraj H. Tolia, Eric J. Enemark, B. Kim Lee.
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Jinzhong Lin, Matthieu G. Gagnon, David Bulkley, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Crystal Structure of SRP19 in Complex with the S Domain of SRP RNA and Its Implication for the Assembly of the Signal Recognition Particle  Chris Oubridge,
Jingqi Duan, Ling Li, Jing Lu, Wei Wang, Keqiong Ye  Molecular Cell 
Structure and Mechanism of Imidazoleglycerol-Phosphate Dehydratase
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Volume 123, Issue 7, Pages (December 2005)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Crystal Structure of Eukaryotic DNA Ligase–Adenylate Illuminates the Mechanism of Nick Sensing and Strand Joining  Mark Odell, Verl Sriskanda, Stewart.
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Structural Basis for Ligand Binding to the Guanidine-I Riboswitch
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Presentation transcript:

The Structure of Human Argonaute-2 in Complex with miR-20a Elad Elkayam, Claus-D. Kuhn, Ante Tocilj, Astrid D. Haase, Emily M. Greene, Gregory J. Hannon, Leemor Joshua-Tor  Cell  Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages 100-110 (July 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Small RNAs Stabilize hAgo2 (A) Digestion of hAgo2, purified without bound, endogenous small RNAs (Figure 1, lane “not bound to RNA”) with thermolysin resulted in a digestion pattern of typical multidomain proteins. Increasing concentrations of enzyme (indicated by the wedge) released stable protein fragments corresponding to known domains (indicated), as determined by N-terminal sequencing or mass spectrometry. In contrast, treatment of hAgo2 purified along with endogenous SF9 small RNAs was remarkably protease resistant (B). (C) Addition of synthetic miR-20a (1–20) to the fraction shown in (A) conferred stability to protease. See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of hAgo2 in Complex with miR-20a A schematic representation of the hAgo2-miR-20a complex is displayed with each domain and interdomain linker labeled. The N domain is shown in blue, the PAZ domain in red, the Mid domain in green and the PIWI domain in purple. The miRNA is shown in stick representation. The 5′ end of miR-20a is bound to the Mid domain. Nucleotides 2 to 10 track along the RNA binding groove, and nucleotides 17 to 20 are bound to the PAZ domain. The location of the active site is circled. For reference, a bar diagram is given below, color-coded as described, indicating the positions of boundaries between structural domains. Other views of the complex are shown in Figure S2. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structural Comparison of hAgo2, PfAgo, and Tt Ago Argonaute proteins across the three kingdoms of life show striking similarities in their overall structures. All structures were superimposed based on their respective PIWI domains and are oriented as in Figure 2. (A) hAgo2-miR-20a complex adopts the most open conformation of all full-length Argonaute structures determined to date. This is compared to the archaeal PfAgo (B), eubacterial TtAgo bound to a 21-mer DNA guide (C), and TtAgo in complex with a 21-mer DNA guide and a 19-mer RNA target (D). See also Figure S4. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structural Basis of RNA-Induced Stability of hAgo2 (A) hAgo2 is shown in the canonical view as in Figure 2 to highlight interactions of the RNA across all constituent domains of the protein. The two thermolysin cleavage sites at I427 and I577 are shown as red spheres, which are only 10 Å apart and likely require flexibility in the protein for access by the protease. Extensive interactions between the protein and RNA are proposed to “glue” the structure into place, preventing the needed flexibility. (B) An additional view from the MID domain is shown, clarifying the location of the cleavage sites and the path of the RNA. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 miR-20a Interactions with hAgo2 (A) A guide to the interactions between miR-20a (the first ten and last four bases that appear unambiguously in the structure) and hAgo2 is shown schematically. Interactions with backbone phosphates, sugars, and bases are indicated according to the key. Interacting residues are color-coded with respect to their domain location as in Figure 3. (B) The site in the Mid domain (light green), which binds the 5′ end of miR-20a is shown. The first miR-20a base (U1) and the terminal monophosphate are displayed along with the interactions they make with hAgo2. Interacting protein side chains are shown in stick representation in atom colors with carbons in white, nitrogens in blue and oxygens in red. The 5′U is shown in atom colors as above, but with carbons in blue and phosphorous in orange. The direction of the RNA chain is shown as a dashed line. The portion of the PIWI domain, which caps the pocket, is shown in purple. (C) The U6-G7 kink and the U9-U10 kink are shown in cartoon form. The L2 Linker is displayed in yellow, the PIWI domain in purple, and the miRNA in stick as in (B). See text for details. See also Figures S5 and S6. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Theoretical Modeling of the Complete miRNA (A) Nucleotides 11–16 of miR-20a were modeled with guidance from residual electron density (see text). Color coding is as in Figure 3. See also Figure S6. (B) A close-up of the G14-U15 turn is displayed, showing the “proline knuckle” emanating from the N domain on one side and R278 and K280 emanating from the PAZ domain on the other. (C) The sequence of the 20-mer miR-20a is given. Ordered nucleotides are in blue, modeled ones in pale blue. The amino acids in the proline knuckle constriction are shown on both sides of the miRNA in green. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Purification of hAgo2 along with Insect-Derived Small RNAs, Related to Figure 1 (A) hAgo2 was purified from insect cells along with a population of endogenous, insect cell-derived RNAs (endogenous 20-mer). Further purification resulted in a fraction that did not appear to harbor bound RNAs (not bound to RNA). This unbound fraction could be loaded with exogenously added miRNAs (loaded with 21-mer). Small RNAs were recovered from purified hAgo2 and analyzed by sequencing. Purified hAgo2 preferentially bound ∼20 nt RNAs (B) from a population of endogenous SF9 RNAs (C) that likely comprises endo-siRNAs, miRNAs, and piRNAs. hAgo2 shows an enrichment for a terminal U or A residue (D) that is slightly more pronounced than observed for the total population of 20 nt SF9 small RNAs (E). Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Purification of hAgo2 and Complex Formation, Related to Figure 1 (A) Purification of hAgo2 on MonoS (5/50 GL) yielded two discrete species. One bound to endogenous RNA that eluted with 150 mM KCl and one without bound RNA eluting at 375 mM KCl. (B) Separation of excess miR-20a from hAgo2-miR-20a complex on a Superdex 200 (10/300 GL) column. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Overall Structure of the hAgo2-miR-20a Complex, Related to Figure 2. (A)-(C) Additional views for the overall structure shown in Figure 2 are presented. Color code as in Figure 2. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 The Eukaryotic Insertion in the PIWI Domain, Related to Figure 3 QDE-2 was superimposed onto the Mid and PIWI domains of hAgo2. The insertion specific for eukaryotic Argonaute proteins in shown in orange for QDE-2 (residues K901-G925). In the complex structure of hAgo2 and miR-20a half of the eukaryotic insertion is disordered, except for residues 837 through 848. The miRNA is shown in stick and colored as in Figure 5. The QDE-2 Mid-PIWI lobe is shown in salmon, hAgo2 is shown in gray. hAgo2 is shown in a back view with respect to Figure 2. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 Electron Density for miR-20a, Related to Figures S5 and S6 Unbiased experimental electron density map for nucleotides 1–10 (A) and 17–20 (C) contoured at 1σ. The RNA is shown as orange stick. The PIWI domain is in purple, the Mid domain in green, the PAZ domain in red. (Fobs − F calc) electron density map for nucleotides 1-10 (B) and 17-20 (D) calculated with sigmaA-weighted phases from the initial model before RNA was added during refinement. Contoured at 1σ. (E) (2Fobs − Fcalc) electron density map of miR-20a in the final map. The contour level is 1σ for nucleotides 1–10 and 17–20 and 0.8σ for nucleotides 11–16. Modeled nucleotides are shown as sticks in wheat color. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S6 Kink between U1 and A2 of miR-20a, Related to Figure 5 The Mid domain is shown in green, the PIWI domain is in purple, the RNA is as in Figure 2. Residues N551, T559 and L563 block the folding of the miRNA into a continuous helix and force the 5′ uridine monophosphate into a deep binding pocket at the interface between the Mid and PIWI domains. Cell 2012 150, 100-110DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.017) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions